¹ In interview with Alinder, James, “An Interview with Susan Sontag,” Untitled, 15 (1986), 36.Google Scholar

² Sontag, Susan, “Preface” to Barthes, Roland, Writing Degree Zero (Boston: Beacon Press, 1970), xi.Google Scholar

³ Sontag, Susan, Styles of Radical Will (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1987), 75.Google Scholar

⁴ Sontag, Susan, the “The Salmagundi Interview,” A Susan Sontag Reader, ed. Hardwick, Elizabeth (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983), 346.Google Scholar

⁵ Rosenberg, Harold, The Tradition of the New (London: Paladin, 1970), 10.Google Scholar

⁶ Barthes, Roland, Mythologies (New York: Hill and Wang, 1972), 11.Google Scholar

⁷ Sontag, Susan, On Photography (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979), 19.Google Scholar

⁸ Sontag, Susan, Against Interpretation (New York: Octagon, 1982), viii.Google Scholar

⁹ Ibid., 171.

¹⁰ On Photography, 32.Google Scholar

¹¹ Against Interpretation, 90.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., 13.

¹³ Trilling, Lionel, Beyond Culture: Essays on Literature and Learning (New York: Viking Press, 1965), 179.Google Scholar

¹⁴ See Foucault, Michel, Madness and Civilisation (New York: Pantheon, 1965).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Derrida, Jacques, “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, eds. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugenio (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), 252.Google Scholar

¹⁶ On Photography, 23.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Styles of Radical Will, 91.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Burke, Kenneth, “Linguistic Approach to Problems of Education,” Modern Philosophies and Education, ed. Henry, Nelson B. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955), 271.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Against Interpretation, 50.Google Scholar

²⁰ Derrida, Jacques, Positions (London, 1981), 41.Google Scholar

²¹ Against Interpretation, 275–92.Google Scholar

²² Ibid., 290.

²³ Ibid., 288.

²⁴ “The Salmagundi Interview,” 340.Google Scholar

²⁰ See Stallybrass, Peter and White, Allon, eds., The Politics and Poetics of Transgression (Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

²⁶ Styles of Will, Radical, 70–71.Google Scholar

²⁷ Foucault, Michel, The Archeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock, 1972), 130.Google Scholar

²⁸ Sontag, Susan, “On Art and Consciousness,” Performing Arts Journal, 2 (1976), 32.Google Scholar

²⁹ See Derrida, Jacques, Margins of Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 3–27.Google Scholar

³⁰ I follow Catherine Belsey's formulation here in her proposal to study a “politics of meaning.” Belsey has recognized the dangers of relativism and argued the need to “lay claims to specific meanings in the name of politics, not truth.” However, I fail to see how her specific political meanings can be anything other than forms of truth. Belsey, Catherine, “The Politics of Meaning,” in Barker, Francis et al. , eds., Confronting the Crisis (Essex: University of Essex, 1984), 27–29.Google Scholar

³¹ Williams, Raymond, Politics and Letters (London: New Left Books, 1979), 172.Google Scholar

³² Against Interpretation, 69–70, 80.Google Scholar

³³ Against Interpretation, 80.Google Scholar There is a trace of Sontag's distrust of humanist universalism in her comments on Levi-Strauss, as when she comments that “for Levi-Strauss, the logic of mythic thought is fully as rigorous as that of modern science … [he] argues that the activity of the mind in imposing form on content is fundamentally the same for all minds, archaic and modern” (79). Jean Baudrillard is more direct in his charge against Levi-Strauss's work: “this is the extreme of liberal thought and the most beautiful way of preserving the initiative and priority of Western thought within ‘dialogue’ and under the sign of the universality of the human mind (as always for Enlightenment anthropology). Here is the beautiful soul! Is it possible to be more impartial in the sensitive and intellectual knowledge of the other? This harmonious vision of his thought processes renders their confrontation perfectly inoffensive, by denying the difference of the primitives as an element of rupture with and subversion of [our] ‘objectified thought and its understanding.’” Baudrillard, Jean, Mirror of Production (St. Louis: Telos, 1975), 90.Google Scholar

³⁴ Styles of Will, Radical, 271.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid., 225, 270, 271.

³⁶ Ibid., 263–64; 264.

³⁷ A Susan Sontag Reader, 275, 284, 286.Google Scholar

³⁸ Ibid., 285.

³⁹ Ibid., 268, 282, 284, 286.

⁴⁰ Ibid., 443.

⁴¹ Berman, Art, From the New Critics to Deconstruction: The Reception of Structuralism and Poststructuralism (Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 229.Google Scholar

⁴² Ibid., 5.

⁴³ Against Interpretation, 202.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ A Susan Sontag Reader, 431.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Barthes, Roland, Roland Barthes (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁶ Barthes, Roland, The Pleasure of the Text (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), 82.Google ScholarBarthes, Roland, S/Z (New York: Hill and Wang, 1974), 11.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Barthes, Roland, Critical Essays (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972), 386.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Brooks, Peter, “Death Of/As Metaphor,” Partisan Review, 46 (1979), 438.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Ibid., 439.

⁵⁰ On Photography, 156.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1970), 386.Google Scholar

⁵² Foster, Hal, “The ‘Primitive’ Unconcious,” Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics (Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press, 1984)Google Scholar. The notion that all sites of otherness are fully colonized by culture has gained much credence amongst critics of postmodernity. See Jameson's, Fredric influential argument, “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New Left Review, 146 (07–08, 1984), 53–92.Google Scholar