Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:40:47.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the Ends of the Earth: Donald Rumsfeld, the Mantra of Progress, and an Outer-Space View of America's War on Terror

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2011

LLOYD GARDNER  and
BEVAN SEWELL
LLOYD GARDNER
Affiliation:
Lloyd Gardner: Department of History, Rutgers University. Email: lgardner79@gmail.com.
BEVAN SEWELL
Affiliation:
Bevan Sewell: Department of American and Canadian Studies, University of Nottingham. Email: bevan.sewell@nottingham.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the way that US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld sought to apply one of the central lessons of the Vietnam War to the George W. Bush administration's War on Terror after 9/11. Following the disastrous withdrawal from Vietnam, Rumsfeld had argued that one of the major lessons to be taken forward was that, in future conflicts, the US needed to ensure that the war was portrayed to the public in a way that would ensure ongoing success. The way to do this, Rumsfeld subsequently averred, was to convey a message of perpetual, unstoppable, but not too rapid, progress; victory was at hand, but it would take some time to achieve. As part of this process, Rumsfeld developed an elaborate narrative based around a keyhole satellite picture of the Korean peninsula at night – one half, that of South Korea, bathed in the light of progress; the other, North Korea, nearly completely dark. This photo, Rumsfeld suggested, told you all you needed to know about the fact that the US would ultimately succeed in the War on Terror. In taking this approach, however, Rumsfeld unwittingly revealed an inherent contradiction that has continued to blight the administration of Barack Obama: that there is a very fine line between progress toward an inevitable endpoint of victory and progress toward a position whereby the US is able to withdraw. For Rumsfeld, progress was toward an endpoint of victory and it was only the change in political context after 2006 that derailed his attempts to set out this message; for Obama, on the other hand, progress has become a prerequisite for getting out of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 4: 10 Years After 9/11 , November 2011 , pp. 643 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Memorandum by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to Wolfowitz, Myers, Feith and Pace, 16 Oct. 2003, reproduced in “Rumsfeld's War-on-Terror Memo,” USA Today, 20 May 2005, http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/executive/rumsfeld-memo.htm, accessed 28 March 2011.

2 All quotes from Eric Schmitt and Tom Shanker, “Washington Recasts ‘War on Terror’ as Struggle,” New York Times, 27 July 2005.

3 “Clips from Last Night: Donald Rumsfeld on 9/11,” http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/09/clips-from-last-night-donald-rumsfeld-on-911–war-on-terror-and-sons-addiction/, accessed 28 March 2011.

4 On Rostow see David Milne, America's Rasputin: Walt Rostow and the Vietnam War (New York: Hill & Wang, 2008); Andrew Preston, The War Council: McGeorge Bundy, the NSC, and Vietnam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), 75–101.

5 Bernard Brodie, Strategy in the Missile Age (New York, 1965), 50.

6 Kilcullen quoted in Trudy Rubin, “Worldview: Obama's Detrimental Deadline,” 25 July 2010, http://articles.philly.com/2010–07–25/news/24969811_1_afghan-government-taliban-factions-afghan-people, accessed 20 Feb. 2011.

7 Mark Landler and Jeff Zeleny, “Among Obama Aides, Debate Intensifies on Troop Levels,” New York Times, 12 Nov. 2009.

8 George Herring, “The Vietnam Syndrome,” in David Anderson (ed.), The Columbia History of the Vietnam War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 411; for a depiction of the way that Vietnam has been “remembered” see McMahon, Robert, “Contested Memory: The Vietnam War and American Society, 1975–2001,” Diplomatic History, 26, 2 (Spring 2002), 159–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Address by President Nixon to the American people Announcing the Conclusion of the Vietnam War, 23 Jan. 1973, Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Richard Nixon 1973 (hereafter PPPUS, president name and year), http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=58057&st=&st1=, accessed 10 Feb. 2011.

10 “Lessons of Vietnam” by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. Draft Memorandum for President Ford, 12 May 1975 (unsent), taken from http://www.ford.utexas.edu/library/exhibits/vietnam/750512a.htm, accessed 17 March 2011; for a broader discussion of some of these issues see David Ryan, “Vietnam, Victory Culture and Iraq: Struggling with Lessons, Constraints and Credibility from Saigon to Falluja,” in John Dumbrell and David Ryan (eds.), Vietnam in Iraq: Tactics, Lessons, Legacies, and Ghosts (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), 111–39.

11 On JFK, the Green Berets, concerns on the periphery, and the impact of Cuba, see Michael Latham, Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000), 1–21, 69–72; idem, The Right Kind of Revolution: Modernization, Development, and US Foreign Policy from the Cold War to the Present (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011), 123–57; Lawrence Freedman, Kennedy's Wars: Cuba, Berlin, Laos, and Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000); Robert Dean, Imperial Brotherhood: Gender and the Making of Cold War Foreign Policy (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2001), 184–87; Stephen Rabe, The Most Dangerous Area in the World: John F. Kennedy Confronts Communism in Latin America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).

12 “Summary of President Kennedy's Remarks to the 496th Meeting of the National Security Council,” 18 Jan. 1962, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963: National Security Policy (hereafter FRUS) (Washington, DC: G.P.O, 1996), Volume VIII, 238–42.

13 Odd Arne Westad, The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of our Times (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), chapters 1–4.

14 On Kennedy and Laos see Seth Jacobs, “‘No Place to Fight a War’: Laos and the Evolution of U.S. Policy toward Vietnam, 1954–1963,” in Marilyn Young and Mark Bradley (eds.), Making Sense of the Vietnam Wars: Local, National, and Transnational Perspectives (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).

15 Memorandum from National Security Advisor Walt Rostow to President Johnson, 21 April 1966, FRUS 1964–1968, Volume IV, Doc No. 125.

16 Sir Montague Burton Lecture by Walt Rostow, the University of Leeds, Leeds, England, 23 Feb. 1967, taken from The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume IV (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), 666–67.

17 Memorandum for the Record drafted by Paul Nitze, 29 March 1968, FRUS 1964–1968, Volume VI, Doc No. 166; Campbell Craig and Fredrik Logevall, America's Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009), 248–51.

18 Garry Wills, Nixon Agonistes: The Crisis of the Self-Made Man (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1970), 20 (emphasis added).

19 Armstrong quoted in Jeremi Suri, “Henry Kissinger and American Grand Strategy,” in Fredrik Logevall and Andrew Preston (eds.), Nixon in the World: American Foreign Relations, 1969–1977 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 67–68.

20 Ryan, “Vietnam, Victory Culture and Iraq,” 111–39.

21 For a wide-ranging discussion of the idea that Vietnam was “lost” due to America's mistakes and a fulsome critique of those ideas see Andrew Wiest and Michael Doidge, Triumph Revisited: Historians Battle for the Vietnam War (New York: Routledge, 2010).

22 Rice quoted in Lloyd Gardner, “Obama Says He's a Realist in the Mold of George H. W. Bush. What Does that Really Mean?”, History News Network, 1 Dec. 2008, http://hnn.us/articles/57132.html, accessed 12 Jan. 2011.

23 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to President Bush, 29 Nov. 2005, The Rumsfeld Papers, http://www.rumsfeld.com/library/default.asp, accessed 21 Feb. 2011.

24 Remarks by Congressman Donald Rumsfeld to Congress on the US Problem in South Vietnam, 11 April 1966, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 18 March 2011.

25 Donald Rumsfeld, Known and Unknown: A Memoir (New York: Sentinel, 2011), chapter 14.

26 Memorandum from Donald Rumsfeld to Secretary of State George Shultz, 23 Nov. 1983, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 18 March 2011.

27 Letter and memorandum from Donald Rumsfeld to Political Advisor to Texas Governor George W. Bush, Joshua Bolten, 12 April 1999, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 18 March 2011.

28 Speech by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld at NATO Council, 7 June 2001, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s010607c.htm, accessed 19 Feb. 2011.

29 Transcript of Media Roundtable, Canberra, 29 July 2001, http://www.usrsaustralia.state.gov/us-oz/2001/07/29/rumsfeld.html, accessed 19 Feb. 2011.

30 Media availability with Russian Journalists, 13 Aug. 2001, http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd59/59docs10.htm, accessed 18 Feb. 2011.

31 For an insightful analysis of this see Andrew Bacevich, The Long War: A New History of US National Security Policy since 1945 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).

32 Excerpt from interview on NBC Meet the Press, 2 Dec. 2001, http://www.cnss.org/rumsmtp1202.htm, accessed 22 Feb. 2011.

33 Memo from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to Torie Clarke, 23 Sept. 2001, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 12 March 2011.

34 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to Paul Wolfowtiz, Douglas Feith, Torie Clarke, and Larry Di Rita, 16 Oct. 2002, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 18 March 2001.

35 Defense Department Briefing by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 23 Dec. 2002, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2002/12/mil-021223–usia01.htm, accessed 20 March 2011.

36 “Rumsfeld Says Iraq Weapons Inspectors Need More Time,” 4 Feb. 2004, http://www.acronym.org.uk/docs/0402/doc02.htm, accessed 23 Feb. 2011.

37 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Remarks at the US–Korean Business Council Lunch, 23 Sept. 2003, http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3175, accessed 22 Feb. 2011; Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Remarks at the American Chamber of Commerce Joint Breakfast Meeting, 18 Nov. 2003, http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcriptaspx?transcript=2961, accessed 23 Feb. 2011.

38 Rumsfeld, Known and Unknown, 643–44.

39 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to President Bush, 18 Jan. 2005, The Rumsfeld Papers, accessed 18 March 2001. Underlining in original.

40 “North Korea Might Now Have the Bomb, but It Doesn't Have Much Electricity,” 13 Oct. 2006, Mail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-410158/North-Korea-The-Bomb-doesnt-electricity.html, accessed 21 Feb. 2011.

41 Robert Kagan and William Kristol, “A Perfect Failure: The Iraq Study Group Has Reached a Consensus,” Weekly Standard, 12, 13 (11 Dec. 2006).

42 Transcript of President Bush's Speech at the Veterans of Foreign Wars Convention, New York Times, 22 Aug. 2007.

43 On the notion of decline in the 1970s see the essays in Niall Ferguson, Charles Maier, Erez Manela and Daniel Sargent (eds.), The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).

44 “Korean War Was No Tie, Obama Assures Alllies,” Associated Press, 11 Nov. 2010, http://www.journalgazette.net/article/202101111/NEWA/311119963/1006/NEWS, accessed 12 Nov. 2010; “Obama Speech Marks Shift on North Korea,” New York Times, Nov. 11 2010.

45 Remarks by Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 6 Dec. 2010, http://nixonfoundation.org/contact-us/media-center/press-releases/remarks-by-sec-donald-rumsfeld-december-6–2010, accessed 20 March 2011.

46 Mike Brownfield, “Donald Rumsfeld: American Remains the Greatest Republic Ever Established,” The Foundry: Conservative Policy News, 27 June 2010, http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/27/37139, 21 Feb. 2011.

47 Don Nissenbaum and Jonathan S. Landay, “U.S. Efforts in Kandahar, Barely Begun, Already Are Faltering,” McClatchy Newspapers, 13 May 2010; and Karen DeYoung, “Results of Kandahar Offensive May Affect Future U.S. Moves,” Washington Post, 23 May 2010.

48 “The ‘Lost’ Hillary Clinton Afghan Briefing Transcript,” Los Angeles Times Blog, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/12/hillary-clinton-robert-gates-white-house-afghan-briefing.html, accessed 20 Feb. 2011.

49 Interview on ABC News, This Week, 7 Nov. 2010, http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-rand-paul-rep-mike-pence-david/story?id=120788248page=4, accessed 20 Feb. 2011.

50 Ferguson, Niall, “Complexity and Collapse: Empires on the Edge of Chaos,” Foreign Affairs, 89, 2, (March/April 2010), 18–32Google Scholar.

51 State of the Union Address by President Obama, 25 Jan. 2011, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/25/remarks-president-state-union-address, accessed 22 Feb. 2011.

52 Remarks by President Obama on the way forward in Afghanistan, 22 June 2011, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/06/22/remarks-president-way-forward-afghanistan, accessed 7 July 2011.

53 Dexter Filkins, “Endgame,” New Yorker, 4 July 2011.

54 “Independent Task Force Conditionally Supports U.S. Policy in Pakistan, Afghanistan, but Argues for Changing Strategy Absent Progress,” Council on Foreign Relations news release, 12 Nov. 2010, http://www.cfr.org/pakistan/independent-task-force-conditionally-supports-us-policy-pakistan-afghanistan-but-argues-changing-strategy-absent-progress/p23386, accessed 22 Feb. 2011.