No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
H. L. Mencken and American Cultural Masculinism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Extract
H. L. Mencken's antagonism to women's issues seems paradoxical in a man so committed to emancipation and the reexamination of conventional social roles — the very goals for which the women's movement was fighting during the early decades of the twentieth century. The apparent discord of Mencken's attacks on suffragettes, his deprecating depictions of womanhood, and his thinly veiled vilification of women as a source of cultural mediocrity have spurred critics to explain, reformulate, or deny Mencken's disturbing prejudice. Edward A. Martin quixotically suggests that Mencken only “posed as an antifeminist,” while Charles A. Fecher wonders why “today's advocates of ‘women's liberation’ have not resurrected In Defense of Women” — Mencken's lashing satire on the female in America, grossly misread by Fecher as a tribute to women's “intelligence.” But Mencken was not “posing” as an antifeminist any more than he was pretending to be anti-Philistine. His views of women were not only consistent with his own cultural philosophy but joined a paradigm of masculinism underlying the definition of American culture during these years.
This essay does not deny Mencken's considerable contributions to the scene of American letters in the early twentieth century. Alarm at the recently published diaries — which illustrate Mencken's disposition to be “careless of the decencies” in his random remarks on African-Americans and Jews — while justified, often de-contextualizes his opinions from the wider cultural atmosphere. Regarding his views on women as well, I argue that metaphoric and broadly philosophical foundations place many of his views within a larger climate of opinion seeking to link the rise of the feminine with intellectual mediocrity.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1 Martin, Edward A., H. L. Mencken and the Debunkers (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1984), 49Google Scholar, and Fecher, Charles A., Mencken: A Study of His Thought (New York: Knopf, 1978), 123Google Scholar.
2 Bridgwater, Patrick, Nietzsche in Anglo-Saxony (Leicester, Leicester University Press, 1972), 150Google Scholar.
3 Pattee, Fred Lewis, Century Readings for a Course in Literature (New York, Silver & Burdett, 1919), xiiGoogle Scholar.
4 Dolmetsch, Carl R., The Smart Set: A History and Anthology (New York: The Dial Press, 1966), 248Google Scholar.
5 Mencken, H. L., The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche (London: Unwin, 1908), 112Google Scholar.
6 Ibid., 109, 115.
7 Mencken, H. L., A Book of Prefaces (New York: Knopf, 1924), 14Google Scholar.
8 Ibid., 17, 29, 22, 30.
9 Ibid., 95.
10 Riggio, Thomas P., ed., Dreiser-Mencken Letters, 1907–1945, 2 vols. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986), I: 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Mencken, , Prefaces, 120Google Scholar.
12 Ibid., 32–3, 57.
13 Ibid., 103–4.
14 Riggio, I: 84.
15 Mencken, , Prefaces, 213Google Scholar.
16 Mencken, , Nietzsche, 176Google Scholar.
17 Ibid., 177.
18 Ibid., 198.
19 Brandon, Ruth, The Dollar Princesses (London: Weidenfield & Nicolson, 1980), 1Google Scholar.
20 Ibid., 39.
21 Knight, Grant C., The Strenuous Age in American Literature (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1954), 157–8Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., 200.
23 Mencken, H. L., Prejudices, Second Series (New York: Knopf, 1920), 240Google Scholar.
24 Ibid., 241–2.
25 Ibid., 240.
26 Mencken, , Nietzsche, 179–180Google Scholar.
27 Fecher, Charles A., ed., The Diary of H. L. Mencken (New York: Knopf, 1989), 37–8, 110, 213, 225, 439Google Scholar.
28 Mencken, H. L., In Defense of Women (New York: Garden City Publishing, 1918), xv, xiiGoogle Scholar.
29 Mencken, H. L. and Nathan, George Jean, The American Credo: A Contribution toward the Interpretation of the National Mind (New York: Knopf, 1920), 65–6Google Scholar.
30 Mencken, , Defense, xiiGoogle Scholar.
31 Mencken, , Nietzsche, 187Google Scholar.
32 Mencken, , Defense, 11, 9–10, 12Google Scholar.
33 Ibid., 18, 6.
34 Ibid., 26, 82.
35 Mencken, , Nietzsche, 187, 236Google Scholar.
36 Mencken, , Defense, 84–7Google Scholar.
37 Ibid., 76.
38 Ibid., 75.
39 Mencken, , Nietzsche, 178–9Google Scholar.
40 Ibid., 190.
41 Mencken, , Defense, 128, 129, 132, 135, 142, 133Google Scholar.
42 Ibid., 126.
43 Spencer, Herbert, “The Psychology of the Sexes,” Popular Science Monthly, 4 (11 1873), 30–8Google Scholar.
44 Godkin, E. L., “The Political Morality of Women,” Nation, 22 (30 03 1875), 205–6Google Scholar, and Hardaker, M. A., “The Ethics of Sex,” North American, 131 (07 1880),62–74Google Scholar.
45 Thomas, William, “Sex in Primitive Morality,” American Journal of Sociology, 4 (05 1899), 774–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Pyke, Rafford, “What Women Like in Women,” Cosmopolitan, 34 (11 1902), 35–40Google Scholar.
46 Mencken, , Defense, 127Google Scholar.
47 Ibid., 130, 131, 51, 129.
48 Ibid., 173, 175, 174.
99 Ibid., 207–9.
50 Martin, , Debunkers, 56Google Scholar.
51 Fecher, , Mencken: A Study, 126Google Scholar.
52 Martin, 57.
53 Bode, Carl, Mencken (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1969), 154Google Scholar; Fecher, 127n.; and Martin, 52.
54 Mayfield, Sara, The Constant Circle (New York: Delacorte, 1968), 3Google Scholar.
55 Bode, 151; Martin, 52.
56 Fecher, 121.
57 Mencken, , Defense, 209Google Scholar.
58 Mencken, H. L., Notes on Democracy (New York: Knopf, 1926), 29Google Scholar.
59 Martin, 57.