Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:37:35.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fossil, Fuel: Manifesto for the Post-oil Museum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2012

STEPHANIE LE MENAGER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is no secret that natural history museums strive to be archives of life, a common task grown more fraught in recent decades because of the crisis of biodiversity, the extinction of roughly 60,000 species per year. “Bio-informatics” has been a buzzword in the natural history literature of the twenty-first century, which recommends the digitization of museum collections such that global information sharing can keep scientists up to date about species loss. Some curators resent the emphasis upon information technology as the key to the continuing relevance of their collections, arguing, for instance, that “museums are the cornerstone of an object-oriented approach to the natural world.” The question of what durability means for natural history, and by extension for both “nature” and “history,” breaks around what counts as most lifelike: information or object, technology or bone. Los Angeles is a rich setting for the consideration of these questions, both because it is the world capital of the entertainment industry and because it hosts the world's largest archive of Pleistocene fossils, preserved in the asphaltum sinks that formed atop the Salt Lake Oil Field, itself the largest urban oil reserve. What petroleum means to evolving definitions of life, and thus to nature and history, has long been on display at the La Brea tar pits. What is not on display, namely micro-organisms grown up in the region's petroleum sludge, may be the saviors of our current geologic epoch and key to the renewal of the tired natural history concept.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Special Issue on Oil Cultures , May 2012 , pp. 375 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 David Wilson, “Nikolai Federov, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and the Roots of the Russian Space Program,” lecture at the University of California, Santa Barbara, 13 April 2011. For discussion of Wilson's ironic relationship with the natural history endeavor see Weschler, Lawrence, Mr. Wilson's Cabinet of Wonder (New York: Vintage, 1995)Google Scholar.

2 Bennett is particularly concerned with how the relatively new time-scheme of the nation state could be annexed to the universal natural history idea, in Bennett, Tony, “The Exhibitionary Complex,” New Formations, 4 (Spring 1988), 88–89Google Scholar.

3 Kohler, Robert E., All Creatures: Naturalists, Collectors, and Biodiversity, 1850–1950 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar, 2, 3, 9; Conn, Steven, Museums and American Intellectual Life, 1876–1926 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 72Google Scholar.

4 Some curators resent the emphasis upon information technology as the key to the continuing relevance of their collections, arguing, for instance, that “there is a tendency to divorce data from objects,” “museums are the cornerstone of an object-oriented approach to the natural world,” and “the useful life of … specimens” outlasts the analyses made of them. See, for example, Krishtalka, Leonard and Humphrey, Philip S., “Can Natural History Museums Capture the Future?”, BioScience, 50 (July 2000), 612CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Alison Griffiths extensively historicizes interactive exhibits and the concept of “interactivity,” suggesting alternatives to the explicitly digital or even technological application of the concept, in Shivers down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums, and the Immersive View (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008). The journal Curator features frequent articles on interactivity and a 2004 special issue on the topic that includes useful reflections from museum practitioners, for example. Falk, John H., Scott, Carol, Dierking, Lynn, Rennie, Leonie, and Jones, Mika Cohen, “Interactives and Visitor Learning,” Curator, 47 (April 2004), 171–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Conn, 40; a key critical discussion of the popular exhibit versus the disciplinary role of the museum is Bennett, 86.

7 Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences (London: Tavistock, 1970), 132Google Scholar; see also Bennett, Tony, “Pedagogic Objects, Clean Eyes, and Popular Instruction: On Sensory Regimes and Museum Didactics,” Configurations, 6, 3 (1998), 345–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 For a thoughtful general treatment of ecomuseums see Davis, Peter, Ecomuseums: A Sense of Place (London: Leicester University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

9 Huyssen, Andreas, Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia (London: Routledge, 1995), 33Google Scholar.

10 An overview of the rhetorical transformation of bitumen into “oil” – and brief reference to the Oil Sands Discovery Centre can be found in Andrew Nikiforuk, Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent (Vancouver: Greystone, 2010). My general comments refer to a personal visit that I made to this museum, for research purposes, in August 2011.

11 Bennett, Tony, “Civic Laboratories: Museums, Cultural Objecthood, and the Governance of the Social,” Cultural Studies, 19 (Sept. 2005), 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Spaulding, Jonathan, “L.A.: light/motion/dreams: Developing an Exhibition on the Natural and Cultural History of Los Angeles,” Environmental History, 10 (April 2005), 295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Griffiths, 168.

14 Andrea Witcomb offers a strong set of alternative definitions of “interactivity” and a rebuttal to the screen-mania of multimedia exhibit promoters in Re-imagining the Museum: Beyond the Mausoleum (London: Routledge, 2003). See especially chapter 6.

15 “Gail,” docent, George C. Page Museum of La Brea Discoveries, outdoor tour, 17 April 2011.

16 Williams, Linda, “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess,” Film Quarterly, 44 (Summer 1991), 2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 “Imperial Mammoth Struggling in Asphalt Pool,” postcard, George C. Page Museum of La Brea Discoveries. n.p., n.d.

18 Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), 201Google Scholar.

19 “Gail.”

20 Thomas H. Benton, pseud. for William Pannapacker, “Preserving the Future of the Natural History Museum,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 30 Oct. 2009; see also Thomas H. Benton, “Getting Real at Natural-History Museums,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 July 2010, and idem, “Getting Real at the Natural-History Museum, Part 2,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 Aug. 2010.

21 Witcomb, 102.

22 See Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version,” in idem, The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, ed. Michael W. Jennings, Brigid Doherty, and Thomas Y. Levin; trans. Edmund Jephcott and Harry Zohn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), 19–55.

23 Dana W. Bartlett, “Progress Made in Developing Tomb of Giants: Creation of New Park at La Brea Pits Gives City Unique Monument,” Los Angeles Times, 27 March 1927, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

24 Eva G. Taylor, “By the Way,” Los Angeles Times, 1 Feb 1928, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

25 Fox, William L., Making Time: Essays on the Nature of Los Angeles (Emeryville, CA: Shoemaker and Hoard, 2007), 34–37Google Scholar.

26 Although I see Adorno's discussion of the “museal” as ripe for critique, exhibited fossils speak rather literally to his sense that museum objects are dead, by virtue of separation from other cultural relations. See Theodor Adorno, “Valery Proust Museum in Memory of Hermann von Grab,” in idem, Prisms (London: Garden City Press), 175–85.

27 Griffiths, Shivers down Your Spine, 252.

28 Poschin, Max, “What Has Happened to Our Priorities?”, Los Angeles Times, 2 May 1970Google Scholar, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

29 George Miller, quoted in John Kendall, “Fossil Dig to Be Phased Out: Firing Clouds La Brea Pit Study,” Los Angeles Times, 16 Jan. 1972, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

30 See Brinkman, Paul D., The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush: Museums and Paleontology in America at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Quoted in Kendall.

32 I refer to Guy DeBord's now classic The Society of the Spectacle, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone, 1995).

33 Kegley, Howard, “Something Bigger than Barnum,” Los Angeles Times, 10 March 1940Google Scholar, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

34 “Body Hunted in Tar Pits: Missing Girl's Hint Recalled,” Los Angeles Times, 26 Oct. 1935, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

35 “Tar Pits Suicide Hoaxer Jailed as Extortion Suspect,” Los Angeles Times, 23 Jan. 1939, ProQuest Historical Newspapers, accessed 2 April 2011.

36 “Life in Asphalt: New Petroleum-Degrading Bacteria Found at Rancho La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles,” Astrobiology Magazine, 19 May 2007, available at www.astrobio.net/pressrelease/2336/life-in-asphalt, accessed 31 Aug. 2010.

37 Ibid.

38 Conn, Museums and American Intellectual Life, 44–45.

39 For example, see some of the BioArchitectural model cities in Lucas Cappelli and Vicente Guallart, eds., Self-Sufficient City: Envisioning the Habitat of the Future (Barcelona: Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia, 2010).

40 Latour's discussion of the entangled agency of quasi-objects, nonhumans, and “matters of concern” runs throughout his work. One might begin with the explicitly political argument of a more recent book, for example Latour, Bruno, The Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)Google Scholar. Here is Latour discussing the “tangled beings” which are the concern of political ecology: “Political ecology does not shift attention from the human pole to the pole of nature; it shifts from certainty about the production of risk-free objects (with their clear separation between things and people) to uncertainty about the relations whose unintended consequences threaten to disrupt all orderings, all plans, all impacts.” Ibid., 25.

41 Wax, Heather, “Engineering the Magic: Disney Imagineers Give Robots Personality, Charm – and Even a Smile,” IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine, 2 (Summer 2008), 22Google Scholar.