Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T22:35:54.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of urea nitrate and urea phosphate as nitrogen fertilizers for grass and barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. K. R. Gasser
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.

Extract

Urea nitrate, urea phosphate, and a mixture of urea phosphate and urea were tested as nitrogen fertilizers to find whether the presence of the anion decreases the damage urea causes to germinating seeds and seedlings and increases the efficiency of urea by preventing loss of ammonia.

Urea nitrate was compared with ammonium sulphate for grass grown in pots in the glasshouse and with ammonium nitrate for permanent grassland in the field. In the glasshouse, a large dressing of urea nitrate damaged the early growth of grass in sandy-loam soil. On average of sandy-loam and clay-loam soils with a small dressing of fertilizers, grass recovered similar amounts of N from urea nitrate and ammonium sulphate; with the large dressing it recovered less from urea nitrate.

In the field, 100 and 200 lb N/acre were applied to permanent grassland which was cut twice. The herbage was ‘scorched’ by the urea nitrate because its solution is very acid. Urea nitrate at 200 lb N/acre produced less dry matter containing less nitrogen than did ammonium nitrate.

Urea nitrate, urea phosphate and urea phosphateurea mixture were compared with ammonium nitrate for barley and grass grown in clay-loam and sandyloam soils. Tests were made of 33, 67 and 100 lb N/acre for barley and 100, 200 and 300 lb N/acre for ryegrass; the fertilizers were applied immediately before sowing. On the light Woburn soil early growth of barley was least good with urea nitrate, which also damaged the early growth of grass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brioux, C. & Pien, J. (1926). Action fertilisante comparée des différentes formes d'azote existant dans les nouveaux engrais azotés uréiques, dérivés de la cyanamide. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 182, 410–12.Google Scholar
Cochet, A. & Houdin, J. (1932). Sur les phosphates d'urée et de guanylurée. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 195, 324–6.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1964). Urea as a fertilizer. Soils Fertil. 27, 175–80.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1965). Effects of 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)-pyridine on the nitrification of ammonium sulphate and its recovery by ryegrass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 299303.Google Scholar
Large, E C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale. Pl. Path. 3, 128–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matignon, C. & Dodé, M. (1933). Étude cristallographique du phosphate d'urée. Bull. Soc. fr. Miner. Cristallogr. 56, 351–7.Google Scholar
Matignon, C, Dodé, & Langlade, , (1932). Sur le phosphate d'urée. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 194, 1289–94.Google Scholar
Schmeltzer, M. & Birnbaum, K. (1869). Über die Verbindungen von Phosphorsäure und Harnstoff. Z. Chemie. Lpz. 5, 206–9.Google Scholar
Teshima, S. (1935). Influence of urea and cyanamide derivatives on plant growth. J. agric. Chem. Soc. Japan. 11, 1055–74.(Chem. Abstr. 30, 64958).Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. & Morooka, H. (1935). Availability of nitrogen-urea compounds for the rice plants. J. Sci. Soil. Manure. Tokyo 9, no. 1, 2330. (Chem. Abstr. 29, 45046).Google Scholar
Vogel, A. I. (1956). A text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry Including Qualitative Organic Analysis, 3rd ed., p. 442. London: Longmans.Google Scholar