Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T12:48:43.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of chromium oxide and lignin as indicators for the purpose of determining intake and digestibility of mixed rations by beef steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. C. Luitingh
Affiliation:
Livestock and Meat Industries Control Board, Pretoria

Extract

During the winter of 1956, an experiment was conducted, using seventy beef steers of three different age-groups to determine intake and digestibility, by means of the indicator method, of mixed rations differing in ration concentration.

In the first part of the experiment, six pairs of steers of three age-groups receiving two types of rations were used. The pairs were selected on the basis of their rate of gain and constituted the fastest and slowest gaining steers of their respective age and ration groups. The object of the experiment was to ascertain whether any correlation could be found between the rate of gain of the steers and the degree to which the ration was digested.

Two indicators were used, namely, the internal indicator lignin and Cr2O3, administered twice daily by means of gelatin capsules, containing 7·5 g. of the indicator.

Using lignin as an indicator of digestibility, it was found that the calculated digestibility coefficient of both rations varied. A larger variation occurred, however, in the case of the ration with a concentrate to roughage ratio of 2:1 than in the case of the ration with a ratio of 1:3·6.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, E. R., Ashworth, R. de B. & Febguson, W. S. (1948). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 67, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. P., Colby, R. W. & Lyman, C. M. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Bartrum, M. P., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R. (1945). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 27, 202.Google Scholar
Coup, M. R. & Lancaster, R. J. (1952). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 34, 347.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Lloyd, L. E. (1951). J. Nutr. 45, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B. & Swift, R. W. (1943). Bull. Penn. State Coll. no. 452.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Garrigus, W. P. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, W. A., Engel, R. W., Linkous, W. N., Sweeney, H. C. & Graf, C. G. (1956). J. Nutr. 58, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, E. A., Ely, R. E., Jacobson, W. C. & Moore, L. A. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, E. A., Jacobson, W. C. & Moore, L. A. (1952). J. Nutr. 47, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, E. A. & Moore, L. A. (1950). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 385.Google Scholar
King, K. W. & Moore, W. E. C. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, W. J. (1956). J. Nutr. 58, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A. R. & Giesker, L. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 26.Google Scholar
Pigden, W. J. & Brisson, G. J. (1956). Canad. J. Agric. Sci. 36, 145.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F. & Minson, D. J. (1955). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 10, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. R. & Reid, J. T. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. M. & Reid, J. T. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truter, G. J. & Louw, J. G. (1950). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 24, 57.Google Scholar
Voss, H. C. (1958). Unpublished investigation. Department Biochemistry University Pretoria.Google Scholar
Voss, H. C. & Luitingh, H. C. (1957). Unpublished investigation. University Pretoria.Google Scholar