Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:24:08.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susceptibility of some cow peas to infestation and damage by the storage beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Goleoptera: Bruchidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. I. Ofuya
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, The Federal University Technology, P.M.B. 704, Akure, Nigeria

Summary

Fourteen cow peas were tested for susceptibility to infestation and damage by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) in the laboratory. IT81D-897 and Popse showed the lowest damage over a 3-month test period. 100-seed weight was not significantly correlated with seed damage.

The developmental period of G. maculatus was significantly longer in IT81D-897 and Popse than in other cow peas tested. Percentage adult emergence and fecundity of females were also lowest in these two cow peas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fatunla, T. & Badaru, K. (1983). Resistance of cow pea pods to Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 205209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatehouse, A. M. R., Gatehouse, J. A., Dobie, P., Kilminster, A. M. & Boulter, D. (1979). Biochemical basis of insect resistance in Vigna unguiculata. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 948958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. (1975). Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and their Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (1982). Bruchid resistant cowpea varieties. In 1982 Research Highlights, pp. 4950.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. & Singh, S. R. (1983). Varietal resistance in the integrated pest management of oowpea pests. Insect Science Application 4, 199204.Google Scholar
Kranz, J., Schmutterer, H. & Koch, W. (ed.) (1977). Diseases, Pests and Weeds in Tropical Crops. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nwanze, K. F. & Horber, E. (1976). Seed coats of cow-peas affect oviposition and larval development of Callosobruchus maculatus. Environmental Entomology 5, 213218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwanze, K. F., Horber, E. & Pitts, C. W. (1975). Evidence for ovipositional preference of Callosobruchus maculatus for cowpea varieties. Environmental Entomology 4, 409412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofuya, T. I. (1986). Use of wood ash, dry chilli pepper fruits and onion scale leaves for reducing Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) damage in cow-pea seeds during storage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 467468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuji, F. N. C. (1976). A comparison of the susceptibility of cowpea varieties to infestation by Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 20, 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. R. (1977 a). Cowpea cultivars resistant to insect pests in world germplasm collection. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 9, 37.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. (1977 b). Grain Legume Entomology, 51 pp. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Vir, S. (1980). Oviposition response and development of Callosobruchus maculatus F. on different varieties of cowpea. Bulletin of drain Technology 18, 200203.Google Scholar
Vir, S. (1981). Note on the relative susceptibility of different varieties of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 51, 813815.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. S. (1985). Oviposition behaviour and its disruption in the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar