Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T01:47:42.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supplementing high-yielding cows at pasture with concentrates fed at a level determined by milk yield and season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Laird  and
J. Walker-Love
R. Laird
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr
J. Walker-Love
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The practice of supplementary feeding of concentrates has been the subject of much investigation and also the centre of considerable controversy during the last decade. The latter is perhaps not hard to explain as so many variables are present; first and foremost there is the cow which at all times must be considered an individual whether it be milk yield, time of calving or dry-matter intake. In addition, one must always take into account the quantity and quality of grass, both of which are dependent on sward management and the system of grazing.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , October 1962 , pp. 233 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. L. & Bancroft, T. A. (1952). Statistical Theory in Research, pt. II, ch. 15. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1956). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 3.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1959). Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Chapter on ‘Dairy Cows’, p. 21. London: Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Drysdale, A. D. & Watson, J. N. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. M. (1955). Dairy Sci. Abst. 17, 256.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1958). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 3.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1959). Supplement to Dairy Fmr, Lond., 6, 14.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. & Boyne, A. W. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 35, 67.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. (1958). J. Yorks. Agric. Soc. 109, 17.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLusky, D. S. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 45.Google Scholar
McTaggart, H. S. (1961). Vet. Rec. 73, 801.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1959). Rep. Prod. Div. 1958–1959, 9, 68.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agric. Fisheries and Food (1960). N.A.A.S. Bridget's Experimental Husbandry Farm, Ann. Rep. 1960.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th ed.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar