Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:05:04.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the effect of supplementing a concentrate diet with roughages of different quality on the performance of Friesian steers. I. Voluntary food intake and food utilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. A. McCullough
T. A. McCullough
Affiliation:
Loughry Agricultural College, Cookstown, Co. Tyrone, N. Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Concentrate diets supplemented with 5, 20 and 40% of a high- and a low-quality hay were given ad libitum to British Friesian steers from 9 weeks of age to slaughter. The intake of dry matter and metabolizable energy was studied over weight ranges from 91 to 363 kg live weight. The quality of hay did not significantly affect the drymatter intake at any of the weight ranges studied. From 91 to 182 kg live weight the daily dry-matter intake decreased as the proportion of hay in the diet increased. Over the weight range from 182 to 272 kg live weight, intake was maximum at the 20% level of hay supplementation, while from 272 to 363 kg live weight, intake increased with increasing levels of hay in the diet. The supplementation of high-quality hay significantly increased the intake of metabolizable energy by animals weighing 91–182 kg. Increasing proportions of hay in the diet significantly affected the metabolizable energy intake at all stages of growth studied.

At 18 and 36 weeks of age digestibility and N balance studies were carried out. The metabolizable energy expressed as a percentage of the gross energy and the mean retention time of the diets were significantly affected by the age of animal, quality of the hay and the level of hay supplementation. Nitrogen retention was also affected by the age of the animal but not by the quality of the hay.

The relationships between the voluntary intake of dry matter and the metabolizable energy of the diet expressed as a percentage of the gross energy, for different stages of growth, are also presented.

The change in the digestibility and the mean time of retention of the diets in the digestive tract with age and the effect of this on the point where physical regulation to intake gives way to physiological regulation are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 327 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants, p. 214. Technical Reviews, Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P., Kay, M. & Ørskov, E. R. (1969). The effect of different dietary energy concentrations on the voluntary intake and growth of intensively fed lambs. Anim. Prod. 11, 173–85.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1964). The utilization of the metabolizable energy of grass. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23, 62–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. (1966). Nutritional problems arising in intensive animal production-energy aspects. Proc. 9th int. Gongr. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Martin, A. K. (1966). The heat of combustion of the urine of sheep and cattle in relation to its chemical composition and to diet. Br. J. Nutr. 20, 449–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). Utilization of the energy and protein of the same diet by cattle of different ages. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 67, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wilson, R. S. (1963). The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5, 27–42.Google Scholar
Bowers, H. B., Preston, T. R., McDonald, I., MacLeod, N. A. & Philip, E. B. (1965). Intensive beef production. 4. The effect on nitrogen retention of all-concentrate diets containing different levels of fishmeal. Anim. Prod. 7, 19–25.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965) Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Retention times in the small and large intestines. Br. J. Nutr. 19, 325–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, T. A. (1969). A study of factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cattle. Anim. Prod. 11, 145–53.Google Scholar
McCullough, T. A. (1970). A study of the effect of supplementing a concentrate diet with roughages of different quality on the performance of Friesian steers. II. Growth rate, efficiency of food conversion and carcass yield. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. & Baumgardt, B. R. (1965). Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48, 569–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R., Miller, E. L. & Ridgman, W. J. (1967). The intensive rearing of lambs. 2. Voluntary food intake and performance on diets of varying oat husk and beef tallow content. Anim. Prod. 9, 509–20.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Aitken, J. N., Whitelaw, F. G., Macdearmid, A., Philip, E. B. & MacLeod, N. A. (1963). Intensive beef production. 3. Performance of Friesian steers given low-fibre diets. Anim. Prod. 5, 245–9.Google Scholar
Rowett Research Institute. (1962). Beef and Milk Production. Mimeograph rep. (Cattle Section, Applied Nutrition Department.)Google Scholar
SNedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods (5th edn). Amos, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Blaxter, K. L. & McDonald, I. (1967). The relations between the apparent digestibility of roughages in the rumen and lower gut of sheep, tho volume of fluid in the rumen and voluntary feed intake. Anim. Prod. 9, 463–70.Google Scholar