Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:19:11.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of mole drainage with simplified cultivation for autumn-sown crops on a clay soil

1. Background, experiment and site details, drainage systems, measurement of drainflow and summary of results, 1978–80

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Q. Cannell ,
M. J. Goss ,
G. L. Harris ,
M. G. Jarvis ,
J. T. Douglas ,
K. R. Howse  and
S. Le Grice
R. Q. Cannell
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 9JT
M. J. Goss
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 9JT
G. L. Harris
Affiliation:
Field Drainage Experimental Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Cambridge, CB2 2LF
M. G. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Soil Survey of England and Wales, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Surrey, GU10 4LH
J. T. Douglas
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 9JT
K. R. Howse
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 9JT
S. Le Grice
Affiliation:
Field Drainage Experimental Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Cambridge, CB2 2LF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A replicated, long-term field drainage experiment on a clay soil was started in 1978 to investigate the effects of mole drainage on land that had been direct-drilled or ploughed. We here describe the background and the need for this work, details of the experiment and summarize the results for the first 2 years. The main factors causing point-to-point variability in the soil at the experimental site and their relative contributions were assessed. Variations in inherent soil properties were small, except for depth to calcareous clay. Site hydrology was also generally uniform, especially soil water content, and was little affected by the presence of subsoil drainage schemes dating from the 19th century. There were some variations in micro-relief. The drained and undrained plots were hydrologically separated. Equipment was installed to measure separately surface runoff, lateral flow at the bottom of the cultivated layer (the interflow) and deep drainage from the mole and pipe system (in the drained plots only). The design and performance of that equipment is described. In both years much of the undrained soil became saturated in winter, but a residual cultivation pan limited the effect of the mole drains in 1978–9. In 1979–80, after disrupting the pan, the water table in the moledrained plots was about 25 cm deeper than in the undrained plots, root growth was greater and yield of winter wheat 11% heavier. About 90% of water and nutrients draining from the drained plots were carried in the mole and pipe system. The results on water balance, nutrient losses, crop growth and yield are fully reported in companion papers (Harris et al. 1984; Ellis et al. 1984).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 539 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, A. C. (1978). The effect of drainage treatments on cereal yields; results from experiments on clay lands. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. C. (1980). A novel system for digitising trace records. AREA: Institute of British Geographers 12, no. 2, 123–127.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. C. & Tring, I. M. (1980). The estimation of subsoil hydraulic conductivity: a preliminary report on the DW7 investigation. Research and Development Report No. 4. Land Drainage Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 15 pp.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W. (1980). Soil classification for England and Wales. Technical Monograph No. 14, Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. D. & Bree, T. (1980). Effect of improved land drainage on river flood flows. Flood Studies Report. Five years on. Institution of Civil Engineers. London.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. T. & Ellis, F. B. (1979). Effects of different methods of cultivation and direct drilling and disposal of straw residues on populations of earthworms. Journal of Soil Science 30, 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascombe, C. L. & Jarvis, M. G. (1976). Variability in three areas of the Denchworth soil map unit. I. Purity of the map unit and property variability within it. Journal of Soil Science 27, 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. & Webster, R. (1971). Soil variability: a review. Soils and Fertilizers 34, 1–15.Google Scholar
Beven, K. (1980). The Grendon Underwood field drainage experiment. Institute of Hydrology Report No. 65. Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1965). Methods of Measurement of Liquid Flow in Open Channels. Part 4A. Thin plate weirs and venturi flumes. B.S. 3680. London: British Standards Institution.Google Scholar
Calder, I. R. & Kidd, C. H. R. (1978). A note on the dynamic calibration of tipping bucket raingauges. Journal of Hydrology 39, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q., Davies, D. B., Mackney, D. & Pidgeon, J. D. (1978). The suitability of soils for sequential direct drilling of combine-harvested crops in Britain: a provisional classification. Outlook on Agriculture 9, 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q., Ellis, F. B., Christian, D. G. & Barnes, B. T. (1982). Long-term comparisons of direct drilling, shallow tillage and ploughing on clay and silt loam soils, with particular reference to straw disposal. Proceedings of 9th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation, ISTRO, Osijek, Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q., Ellis, F. B., Christian, D. G., Graham, J. P. & Douglas, J. T. (1980). The growth and yield of winter cereals after direct drilling, shallow cultivation and ploughing on non-calcareous clay soils, 1974–8. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, E. C. (1940). The use of soil moisture characteristics in soil studies. Soil Science 50, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisci, G. (1976). Influence of tillage and drainage systems on physical conditions for loam-clay soils cultivation. Proceedings 7th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization, Uppsala Paper 7, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1976). A review of the effects of agriculture on the chemical composition and quality of surface and underground waters. In Agriculture and Water Quality, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Technical Bulletin 32, pp. 5–57.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. T. & Goss, M. J. (1982). Stability and organic matter content of surface soil aggregates under different methods of cultivation. Soil and Tillage Research 2, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J. T., Goss, M. J. & Hill, D. (1980). Measurements of pore characteristics in a clay soil under ploughing and direct drilling, including use of a radioactive tracer (144Ce) technique. Soil and Tillage Research 1, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, P. M. & Mottram, R. C. (1977). The effects of flow pulsations on orifice plate flowmeters. Proceedings of a Conference at National Engineering Laboratory (ed. Spencer, E. A. and Ramsey, W. J.). Paper A-2, 25–50. Department of Industry, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ehlers, W. (1975). Observations on earthworm channels and infiltration on tilled and untilled loess soil. Soil Science 119, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F. B., Christian, D. G., Bragg, P. L., Henderson, F. K. G., Prew, R. D. & Cannell, R. Q. (1984). A study of mole drainage with simplified cultivation for autumn-sown crops on a clay soil. 3. Agronomy, root and shoot growth of winter wheat, 1978–80. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F. B., Christian, D. G. & Graham, J. P. (1983). Interacting effects of tillage method, nitrogen fertilizer and secondary drainage on winter wheat production on a calcareous clay soil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F. B., Elliott, J. G., Pollard, F., Cannell, R. Q. & Barnes, B. T. (1979). Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals. 3. Winter wheat and spring barley on a calcareous clay soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field Drainage Experimental Unit (1975). Field Drainage Experimental Unit Annual Report. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Gantzer, C. J. & Blake, G. R. (1978). Physical characteristics of Le Sueur clay loam soil following no-till and conventional tillage. Agronomy Journal 70, 853–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, M. J., Howse, K. R. & Harris, W. (1978). Effects of cultivation on soil water retention and use by cereals in clay soils. Journal of Soil Science 29, 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, M. J., Howse, K. R. & Ward, M. A. (1981). Long-term cultivation experiments. Soil water regimes (Denchworth series clay). Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report 1980, p. 11.Google Scholar
Griffith, D. R., Mannering, J. V., Galloway, H. M., Parsons, S. D. & Richey, C. B. (1973). Effect of eight tillage planting systems on soil temperature, per cent stand, plant growth and yield of corn on five Indiana soils. Agronomy Journal 65, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. L. (1976 a) (ed.). A progress report on FDEU sites for 1975. Section 3. Brooksby Hall, Leicestershire. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 76/6, pp. 17–23. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Harris, G. L. (1976 b) (ed.). A progress report on FDEU sites for 1975. Section 4. Layer Breton, Essex. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 76/6, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
Harris, G. L. (1977). An analysis of the hydrological data from the Langabeare experiment. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 77/4. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Harris, G. L., Goss, M. J., Dowdell, R. J., Howse, K. R. & Morgan, P. (1984). A study of mole drainage with simplified cultivation for autumn-sown crops on a clay soil. 2. Soil water regimes, water balances and nutrient loss in drain water. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. (1976). Soil Survey Field Handbook. Technical Monograph No. 5. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden. 99 pp.Google Scholar
Hood, A. E. M. (1975). The leaching of nitrates from intensively managed grassland at Joalott's Hill. In Agriculture and Water Quality, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Technical Bulletin 32, pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
Jarvis, M. G. (1973). Soils of the Wantage and Abingdon District. Memoir of the Soil Survey of Great Britain. 200 pp.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, I. T. (1973). Discording variables in a principal component analysis. II. Real data. Applied Statistics 22, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahnt, G. (1969). Ergebrisse zweijahrigar Direktsaatversuche auf drei Bodentypen. Zeitschrift für Acherbau und Pflanzenbau 129, 227–235.Google Scholar
Kellett, A. J. (1975). Some values for the hydraulic conductivity of British soils. Technical Bulletin 15/4, Field Drainage Experimental Unit, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Luthin, J. W. & Kirkham, D. (1949). A piezometer method for measuring permeability of soil in situ below a water-table. Soil Science 68, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1976). Plastic field drainage pipes annual circular Appendix D. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ADAS/LDS/76/2.Google Scholar
Murdock, L. (1974). No-tillage on soil with restricted drainage. In Proceedings of Conference on No-tillage Research (ed. Phillips, R. E.), pp. 16–19, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Natural Environment Research Council (1975). Flood Studies Report. Natural Environmental Research Council (available from Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford).Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. H. (1934). The durability of mole channels. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 24, 185–191.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. E., Chamen, W. C. T. & Richardson, T. C. (1979). Long-term experiments with tillage systems to improve the economy of cultivations for cereals. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 25, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petch, J. & Faulkner, P. H. (1974). Working Paper 62. Department of Geography, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, J. D. & Soane, B. D. (1977). Effects of tillage and direct drilling on soil properties during the growing season in a long-term barley monoculture system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, J. D. & Thomasson, A. J. (1977). Soil water regimes. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Technical Monograph No. 11.Google Scholar
Rycroft, D. W. (1973). A review of literature on mole draining. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 72/10. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Rycroft, D. W. & Massey, W. (1975). The effect of field drainage on river flow. Technical Bulletin 75/9, 13 pp. Field Drainage Experimental Unit.Google Scholar
Schwab, G. O., Fausey, N. R. & Weaver, C. R. (1975). Tile and surface drainage of clay soils. II. Hydrologic performance with field crops (1962–1972). III. Corn, oat and soybean yields (1962–1972). Research Bulletin 1081, 37 pp. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. & Trafford, B. D. (1976). Climate and drainage. Technical Bulletin 34, 119 pp. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Talman, A. J. (1976). The technique of plaster casts for recording mole channel shape. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 76/5. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Talman, A. J. (1980). Simple flow meters and watertable meters for field experiments. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Report 79/1. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Thorburn, A. A. (1980). Materials for mole casting. Polyurethane foam as an alternative to plaster of Paris. Land Drainage Service Research and Development Report No. 1. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1976). Some conclusions from experimental drainage work on clayland. Soil and Water. Journal of Soil and Water Management Association Ltd 4, 7–9.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1977). Recent progress in field drainage, Part 1. Journal of Royal Agricultural Society of England 138, 27–42.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Massey, W. (1975). A design philosophy for heavy soils. Technical Bulletin 75/5, 32 pp. Field Drainage Experimental Unit.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Oliphant, J. M. (1977). The effect of different drainage systems on soil conditions and crop yield on a heavy clay soil. Experimental Husbandry 32, 75–85.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Rycroft, D. W. (1973). Observations on the soil water regimes in a drained clay soil. Journal of Soil Science 24, 380–386.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Walpole, R. A. (1975). Drainage design in relation to soil series. In Soils and Field Drainage (ed. Thomasson, A. J.), Technical Monograph No. 7, pp. 49–61. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B., Van Doren, D. M. & Schmidt, B. L. (1968). Effect of corn (Zea mays L.) stover mulch on no-tillage corn yield and water infiltration. Agronomy Journal 60, 236–239.Google Scholar
Young, C. P. & Prudhoe, J. (1973). The estimation of flood flows from natural catchments. Transport and Road Research Laboratory Report LR 565, Crowthorne, Berks.Google Scholar