Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T19:12:03.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the sowing date of cotton in the Sudan Gezira: III. The effect of sowing date on yield and quality under different fertilizer and spraying treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Jackson ,
R. C. Faulkner  and
L. Razoux Schultz
J. E. Jackson
Affiliation:
Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani, Sudan
R. C. Faulkner
Affiliation:
Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani, Sudan
L. Razoux Schultz
Affiliation:
Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field experiments from 1959–60 to 1963–4 showed that when blackarm resistant strains of Egyptian type cotton were sown around the beginning of August and adequately protected from fleabeetle, the resultant crop was of higher yield and considerably better average quality than that from the normal mid-to-late August sowings. Effective length, maturity ratio, standard fibre weight, bundle strength and lea-count × strength product were all improved. Sowing in early July, tested in one season only, gave rather better quality but lower yield than sowing in early August. Sowing in late August or in September depressed both yield and quality. The importance of direct climatic effects and of blackarm, fleabeetle, bollworm, other insect pests and wilt in controlling the choice of, and response to, sowing date is briefly discussed.

Thanks are due to the Sudan Gezira Board for kindly supplying the results of the large-scale sowing date trials and for the grading of experimental cotton, to the Shirley Institute of Manchester for the fibre and spinning tests and to the Chief, Agricultural Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Sudan, for permission to publish this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , December 1967 , pp. 329 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boughey, A. S. (1944). Physiological cotton wilt in the Sudan Gezira. Ann. appl. Biol. 31, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, H. (1954). Agronomy and Plant Physiology Section. Rep. Res. Div. Minist. Agric. Sudan, 1953–1954.Google Scholar
Gregory, F. G., Crowther, F. & Lambert, A. R. (1932). The inter-relation of factors controlling the production of cotton under irrigation in the Sudan. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 22, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E. (1967). Studies on the sowing dates of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. I. The influence of date of sowing on plant growth and development. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 305–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E. & Faulker, R. C. (1962). Studies in the quality of Gezira cotton. I. The relationship between quality and crop earliness. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 30, 192–206.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E., Faulkner, R. C. & Razoux, L. (1963). Investigations on crop development. Prog. Rep. Exp. Stns. Emp. Cott. Grow. Corp. 1961–1962. 29, 32–3.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1959). Recent progress in Entomological research in the Sudan Gezira. Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 36, 179–86.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1961). Some factors affecting numbers of Empoasca hybica (De Berg) (Homoptera: Cicadel-lidae) infesting cotton in the Sudan Gezira. Bull. ent. Res. 52, 191–230.Google Scholar
Lord, E. & Underwood, C. (1958). The interpretation of spinning test reports. Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 35, 26–46.Google Scholar