Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:57:04.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in cattle given intraruminal infusions of lactic acid with a grass silage based diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. Jaakkola  and
P. Huhtanen
S. Jaakkola
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Helsinki, SF-00710 Helsinki, Finland
P. Huhtanen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Helsinki, SF-00710 Helsinki, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four Friesian bulls with ruminal and duodenal cannulae were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square experiment to study the effects of lactic acid (LA) on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis. On a dry matter (DM) basis (g/kg), the basal diet comprised grass silage (700), barley (240) and rapeseed meal (60) and it was given at the rate of 7·1 kg DM/day. LA was infused continuously into the rumen at the rates of 0 (L0), 40 (L40), 80 (L80) or 120 (L120) g/kg basal diet DM.

The molar proportion of propionate in the rumen volatile fatty acids (VFA) increased linearly (P < 0.001) and that of acetate, isovalerate, caproate (P < 0.01) and isobutyrate (P < 005) decreased linearly with an increasing rate of LA infusion. At the same time there was a linear decrease (P < 0.05) in the number of rumen protozoa. When the metabolic fate of infused LA was calculated on a molar basis, 0.21 of lactic acid was converted to acetate, 0·52 to propionate and 0.27 to butyrate.

Infusion of LA into the rumen had no effect on the site or extent of the digestion of basal diet organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). LA diets tended to have a lower microbial N flow at the duodenum (71·4 v. 85·8 g N/day) and lower synthetic efficiency in the rumen (14·4 v. 20.4 g N/kg OM apparently fermented) when compared with the control diet. The ratio of duodenal non-ammonia N to N intake was highest with the control diet and lowest with L40, the effect of the LA rate being quadratic (P < 0·05). The results suggest that propionate was the main end-product of lactic acid fermentation in the rumen with the grass silage based diet. Lactic acid had no value as an energy source for microbial protein synthesis.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 411 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. I. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. (1987). The silage fermentation in relation to the utilization of nutrients in the rumen. Process Biochemistry 22, 60–63.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Anderson, F. J. (1983). Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen in sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Martin, P. A. & Robertson, S. (1990). The effect of the extent of fermentation in the silo on the nutritional value of grass silage for milk production. In Proceedings of the Ninth Silage Conference, pp. 122–123. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. (1986). An Introduction to Rumen Studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ekern, A. & Reid, J. T. (1963). Efficiency of energy utilization by young cattle ingesting diets of hay, silage and hay supplemented with lactic acid. Journal of Dairy Science 46, 522–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers in partitioning digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Eds McDonald, I. I. & Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 277–291. Sydney: The University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Firkins, J. L., Berger, L. L., Merchen, N. R., Fahey, G. C. Jr. & Mulvaney, R. L. (1987). Ruminal nitrogen metabolism in steers as affected by feed intake and dietary urea concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 2302–2311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M., Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Rowe, J. B. (1986). Metabolism of lactic acid isomers in the rumen of silage-fed sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, F. J. (1989). An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. Grass and Forage Science 44, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1966). Least-Square Analysis of Data with Unequal Subclass Numbers. Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, T., Väätäinen, H. & Lampila, M. (1989). Effect of silage quality on milk yield and composition in dairy cows. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Production, Evaluation and Feeding of Silage, pp. 177–183. Rostock: Research Centre for Animal Production at Dummerstorf.Google Scholar
Honig, H. & Rohr, K. (1973). Über den Einfluss von Formalin und formalinhaltigen Zusatsmitteln auf den Silierverlauf und die Vormagenverdauung bei Milchkühen. Wirtschaftseigene Furter 19, 21–30.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. (1988). The effects of barley, unmolassed sugar-beet pulp and molasses supplements on organic matter, nitrogen and fibre digestion in the rumen of cattle given a silage diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. (1992). The effect of barley vs barley fibre with or without distiller's solubles on site and extent of nutrient digestion in cattle fed grass silage based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 36, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. & Miettinen, H. (1992). Milk production and concentrations of blood metabolites as influenced by the level of wet distiller's solubles in dairy cows receiving grass silage-based diet. Agricultural Science in Finland 1, 279–290.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, S. (1990). The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes on the preservation of grass and on the silage intake and digestibility in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 62, 51—62.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, S. & Huhtanen, P. (1989). The effect of lactic acid on the microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2, 398–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaakkola, S., Huhtanen, P. & Hissa, K. (1991). The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes or formic acid on fermentation quality and on digestion of grass silage by cattle. Grass and Forage Science 46, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. L. & Mcallan, A. B. (1991). Enzymes as silage additives. 1. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 46, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouany, J. P., Demeyer, D. I. & Grain, J. (1988). Effect of defaunating the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 21, 229–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalili, H. & Huhtanen, P. (1991). Sucrose supplements in cattle given grass silage-based diet 2. Digestion of cell wall carbohydrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. A., Chamberlain, D. G. & Robertson, S. (1990). Effects of the chemical composition of silage and of supplementary feeds on rumen digestion in sheep. In Proceedings of the Ninth Silage Conference, pp. 46–47. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
Mcallan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1983). Factors influencing the digestion of dietary carbohydrates between the mouth and abomasum of steers. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, D. J. & L'estrange, J. L. (1976). Effect of dietary additions of hydrochloric and lactic acid on feed intake and metabolism of sheep and cattle. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 55–63.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. J. & L'estrange, J. L. (1977). Voluntary feed intake and metabolism of sheep when lactic acid is administered in the feed or intraruminally. Journal of the British Grassland Society 32, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, C. J., Chamberlain, D. G. & Williams, A. G. (1986). The effects of defaunation on the metabolism of lactic acid in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 1083–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, C. J., Williams, A. G. & Chamberlain, D. G. (1987). The in-vitro metabolism of D, L-lactic acid by rumen microorganisms. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 38, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Macleod, N. A. (1983). Flow of endogenous N from the rumen and abomasum of cattle given protein-free nutrients. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42, 61A.Google Scholar
Porter, M. G., Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J. & Gordon, F. J. (1984). Determination of dry matter and gross energy of grass silage. In Seventh Silage Conference. Summary of Papers, pp. 89–90. Belfast: The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B. (1984). Factors influencing competition and composition of the rumen bacterial flora. In Herbivore Nutrition in Subtropics and Tropics (Eds Gilchrist, F. M. C. & R.I., Mackie), pp. 313–345. Craighall: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Nolan, J. V., Beever, D. E. & Macrae, J. C. (1985). Nitrogen digestion and metabolism in sheep consuming diets containing contrasting forms and levels of N. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, H. J. & Russell, J. B. (1986). Effect of pH and energy spilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohydrate-limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2941–2947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C. (1982). Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production. Occasional Publication no. 6, British Society of Animal Production (Eds Thomson, D. D., Beever, D. D. & Gunn, R. R.), pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Udén, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van, Soest P. J. (1980). Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldo, D. R. & Schultz, L. H. (1956). Lactic acid production in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 39, 1453–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, R. A. & Owens, F. N. (1986). A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar