Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T20:09:09.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of ewes and lambs on perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, tall fescue and timothy pastures under upland conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Davies  and
T. E. H. Morgan
D. A. Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Oogerddan, Aberystwyth
T. E. H. Morgan
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Oogerddan, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The performance of Welsh Mountain ewes and their single Clun-cross lambs on swards of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and timothy (Phleum pratense L.) was studied over 3 years (1975–1977) at a site 305 m O.D. in mid-Wales. Under a rotational grazing regime at a fixed stocking rate of 25 ewes and lambs/ha, mean daily lamb live-weight gain over the 84 days experimental period from early May to late July was 24 g higher on timothy than on perennial ryegrass and tall fescue and 35 g higher than on cocksfoot. Averaged for the 3 years the mean daily lamb live-weight gains were 194, 170, 170 and 159 g on timothy, perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot respectively. There were, however, marked interactions with years.

Ewe live-weight change varied considerably between grasses and years with cocksfoot poorer than timothy and perennial ryegrass. Mean ewe live-weight change ranged from an overall loss of 39 g/day in 1975 to a gain of 34 g/day in 1977.

Differences detected in animal performance between the four grass species altered during the 84 days of the experiment. Timothy and to a lesser extent tall fescue produced better animal performance early in the season whereas perennial ryegrass came into prominence during July.

The results are discussed in relation to the present and potential use of the grass species under upland conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , August 1982 , pp. 145 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anslow, R. C. & Green, J. O. (1972). Comparative yields of herbage species. In Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin 49 (ed. Spedding, C. R. W. and Diekmahns, E. C.), pp. 438–444, Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux.Google Scholar
Davies, D. A. (1975). Productivity of S.59 red fescue with and without S.I84 white clover under hill conditions. I. Animal performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. A. (1979). Effect of species and varieties on yields of grass. In Changes in Sward Composition and Productivity. Proceedings of Occasional Symposium No. 10 of the British Grassland Society, York, 1978 (ed. Charles, A. H. and Hagger, R. J.), pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
Davies, D. A. & Morgan, T. E. H. (1982). Herbage characteristics of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, tall fescue and timothy pastures and their relationship with animal performance under upland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. (1940). The yield and other characteristics of grasses and clovers when sown in simple mixtures on an exposed hill at an elevation of 1,300 ft. The Welsh Journal of Agriculture 16, 175–205.Google Scholar
Edmond, D. B. (1964). Some effects of sheep treading on the growth of 10 pasture species. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, W. B., Munro, J. M. M. & Scurlock, R. V. (1979). Comparative pasture and animal production from cocksfoot and perennial ryegrass varieties under grazing. Qrass and Forage Science 34, 64–65.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. R., Watkin, B. R. & Grimes, R. C. (1966). An evaluation of pasture quality with young grazing sheep. I. Live-weight growth and clean wool production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, R. C., Watkin, B. R. & Gallagher, J. R. (1967). The growth of lambs grazing on perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot, with and without clover, as related to the botanical and chemical composition of the pasture and pattern of fermentation in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A. (1979). The botanical composition of grasslands in England and Wales: an appraisal of the role of species and varieties. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 140, 140–150.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. (1970). Factors involved in animal production from temperate pastures. Proceedings of XI International Qrassland Congress, pp. A31–A38. University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. & Nicholson, I. A. (1962). Comparison of grass varieties for surface seeding upland pastures. 3. Callunaheath. 4. General discussion. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, I. V. (1964). Comparative productivity of herbage varieties on upland peat. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. (1970). Lamb growth rates. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 121, 32–34.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. & Spedding, C. R. W. (1965). The growth of lambs at pasture. IV. Growth at different times of the year. Journal of the British Grassland Society 20, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, R. & Minson, D. J. (1966). The energy retention of lambs grazing S.37 cocksfoot, S.23 rye- Ewes and lambs on four grasses in the uplands 151 grass and S.24 ryegrass at low grazing pressure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, J. M. M. (1979). Herbage variety evaluation under hill and upland conditions in Wales. In Hill Lands (ed. Luchok, J., Cawthon, J. D., and Breslin, M. J.), pp. 150–156. Morgantown: West Virginia University.Google Scholar
Munro, J. M. M., Davies, D. A. & Morgan, T. E. H. (1973). Research on pasture improvement potential at Pant-y-dr Hill Centre. Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1972, pp. 209–228.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E., Young, N. E. & Orr, R. J. (1976). A comparison of the sown swards of perennial ryegrass S.24 and Italian ryegrass RvP on two-year lamb production system, with different breeds of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. (1928). Rate of growth in lambs. The Welsh Journal of Agriculture 4, 121–141.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L., Powell, K., Balasko, J. A. & McCormiok, C. C. (1978). Performance of lambs on perennial ryegrass, smooth bromegrass, orchardgrass and tall fescue pasture. I. Live-weight changes, digestibility and intake of herbage. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. (1970). Better return from Welsh Mountain ewes. Agriculture, London 77, 126–129.Google Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of north Cardiganshire. Memoirs of the Soil Survey of Great Britain, 153 pp. Harpenden.Google Scholar