Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:36:43.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oxidation in Soils, and its Relation to Productiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Francis V. Darbishire  and
Edward J. Russell
Francis V. Darbishire
Affiliation:
(South Eastern Agricultural College, Wye)
Edward J. Russell
Affiliation:
(Rothamsted Experiment Station).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was shown in an earlier communication that the absorption of oxygen by soil is mainly brought about by the action of microorganisms, and is greatly diminished if the soil has previously been heated to 120ºC. On one occasion the temperature of the steriliser only rose to 95º, and it was found that the rate of oxidation of the soil, instead of being reduced, was considerably increased. This unexpected result led to experiments with other methods of partial sterilisation, such as exposure to vapours of toluene, chloroform, etc., and in each case the same effect was produced, the amount of oxygen absorbed showed a marked increase after the antiseptic was removed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , December 1907 , pp. 305 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 305 note 1 This Journal, Vol. I. 1905, p. 260Google Scholar

page 306 note 1 This Journal, Vol. I. 1905, p. 262Google Scholar

page 310 note 1 Bulletin de la Société Nationale d'Agriculture en France, 1894, Vol. 54, p. 356.Google Scholar

page 310 note 2 Bodenmüdigkeit und Schwefelkohlenstoff, Mainz, 1894, Zabern: also Journal d'Agriculture pratique, 1895, 1, 459Google Scholar. Carbon disulphide appears to have been used as an insecticide 50 years ago in Algeria for destroying grain pests, v. Akbar, 1857, Oct. 16, quoted in Gardeners' Chronicle, 1858, Aug. 28, 653.

page 310 note 3 Koch's, Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte in der Lehre von den Gärungsorganismen, 1895, 6, 280.Google Scholar

page 310 note 4 L'Engrais, 1896, 543.

page 310 note 5 Bul. Soc. Set. Nancy, 1901, 27, abs. in Expt. Station Record, 1902, 13, 528.Google Scholar

page 310 note 6 Annales Agronomiques, 1895, 21, 497.Google Scholar

page 310 note 7 Arbeiten der deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft, Heft 40, 1899.Google Scholar

page 311 note 1 Vierteljahrsschrift d. bayerischen Landwirtschaftrats, 1898, Heft 3, 319Google Scholar, ahs. in Bied. Centr. 1900, 29, 146.Google Scholar

page 311 note 2 Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen, 1904, 60, 433.Google Scholar

page 311 note 3 Berichte der Deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft, 1888, 89, 6 (Generalversammlungs Heft).Google Scholar

page 311 note 4 Deutsche Landw. Presse, 1893, No. 94, 976. Liebscher and Wagner were, on this occasion, the two protagonists, and discussion continued for some time in the Deutsche Landw. Presse.

page 311 note 5 Landw. Versuchs-Stat. 1896, 46, 117.Google Scholar

page 311 note 6 Landw. Jahrbücher, 1899, 28, 224.Google Scholar

page 312 note 1 Jahresbericht der landw. Versuchs. Marburg, 1901–2, p. 16, abs. in Bied. Centr. 1903, 32, 68.Google Scholar

page 312 note 2 Landw. Versuchs-Stat. 1906, 65, 137.Google Scholar

page 312 note 3 Jour, für Landw. 1907, 55, 161.Google Scholar

page 312 note 4 Mass. Hatch Station Bui. 55, see Expt. Station Record, 1899, 10, 1055.Google Scholar

page 312 note 5 Report of Hatch Station, Mass., 1903, p. 38.

page 324 note 1 Arbeiten der deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft, Heft 40, 1899.Google Scholar

page 324 note 2 Arbeiten aus der Biolog. Abteilung für Land- und Forstwirtschaft am Kaiscrlichen Gesundheitsamte, 1903, Bd. 3, Heft 5Google Scholar. For figures confirming their results see Heinze, , Centralblatt für Bakt. und Parasitenkunde, 1907, II. abt. 18, 56.Google Scholar

page 324 note 3 Gerlach, , Bied. Cent. 1898, 27, 717, had suggested that the increased productiveness was due to the destruction of these organisms.Google Scholar