Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T09:03:23.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions from farm-scale anaerobic piggery waste-water digesters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

Jung-Jeng Su  and
Yen-Jung Chen
Jung-Jeng Su*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC Bioenergy Research Center, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Yen-Jung Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
*
Author for correspondence: Jung-Jeng Su, E-mail: jjsu@ntu.edu.tw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pig manure management systems in Taiwan differ from the model representing the Asian region developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The current study was undertaken to update greenhouse gas (GHG) emission factors of anaerobically treated piggery waste water by operating the conventional three-step piggery waste-water treatment system from selected pig farms located in northern, central and southern Taiwan. Biogas mass flow meters were installed to the outlet of anaerobic basins prior to the biogas pressure stabilizers for direct and reliable biogas measurement. The analytic results showed that average GHG emissions were 0.088, 0.128 and 0.066 m3/head/day in the northern, central and southern pig farms, respectively. Thus, the average emission levels of methane and nitrous oxide were 14.38 and 0.055 kg/head/year, respectively, from anaerobic digestion of piggery waste water for the three pig farms. The average removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids by anaerobic digestion process from the three pig farms was about 77, 93 and 70%, respectively.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestionemission factorsgreenhouse gaspiggery waste water
Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 6 , August 2018 , pp. 739 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edn. Washington DC, USA: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation.Google Scholar
Borhan, MS, Mukhtar, S, Capareda, S and Rahman, S (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from housing and manure management systems at confined livestock operations. In Rebellon, LFM (ed.), Waste Management – An Integrated Vision. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 259–296.Google Scholar
Brock, TD and Madigan, MT (1991) Biology of Microorganisms, 6th Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, pp. 828–829.Google Scholar
Burns, RT, Li, H, Xin, H, Gates, RS, Overhults, DG, Earnest, JW and Moody, LB (2008) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from broiler houses in the southeastern United States. In Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Conference Proceedings and Presentations. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE, Paper No. 084649.Google Scholar
COA (2015 a) Capital Food Supplement, Agriculture Statistics Yearbook. Taiwan, ROC: Council of Agriculture (COA). Available at http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/InquireAdvance.aspx (Accessed 9 August 2018). In Chinese.Google Scholar
COA (2015 b) Quantity and Value of Farm Products, Agriculture Statistics Yearbook. Taiwan, ROC: Council of Agriculture (COA). Available at http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/ InquireAdvance.aspx (Accessed 9 August 2018). In Chinese.Google Scholar
COA (2017) Pig Production Report (November 2016). Taiwan, ROC: Council of Agriculture (COA). Available at http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx (Accessed 9 August 2018). In Chinese.Google Scholar
EPA (2016) 2015 Taiwan Greenhouse Gas Inventory: Executive Summary. Taiwan, ROC: Environmental Protection Administration (EPA). Available at http://unfccc.saveoursky.org.tw/2015nir/uploads/00_abstract_en.pdf (Accessed 9 August 2018).Google Scholar
Forster, P, Ramaswamy, V, Artaxo, P, Berntsen, T, Betts, R, Fahey, DW, Haywood, J, Lean, J, Lowe, DC, Myhre, G, Nganga, J, Prinn, R, Raga, G, Schulz, M and Van Dorland, R (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, Averyt, KB, Tignor, M and Miller, HL (eds), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 2). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–234.Google Scholar
IPCC (1996) Agriculture. In Houghton, JT, Meira Filho, LG, Lim, B, Tréanton, K, Mamaty, I, Bonduki, Y, Griggs, DJ and Callander, BA (eds), Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 2: Greenhouse Gas Inventory Workbook (Chapter 4). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, pp. 4.1–4.63.Google Scholar
IPCC (2006) Emissions from livestock and manure management. In Eggleston, HS, Buendia, L, Miwa, K, Ngara, T and Tanabe, K (eds), IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (Chapter 10). Hayama, Japan: IGES, pp. 10.7–10.87.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In Metz, B, Davidson, OR, Bosch, PR, Dave, R and Meyer, LA (eds). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Kelly, CA and Chynoweth, DP (1981) The contributions of temperature and of the input of organic matter in controlling rates of sediment methanogenesis. Limnology and Oceanography 26, 891–897.Google Scholar
Kiene, RP (1991) Production and consumption of methane in aquatic systems. In Rogers, JE and Whitman, WB (eds), Microbial Production and Consumption of Greenhouse Gases: Methane, Nitrogen Oxides, and Halomethanes. Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology, pp. 111–146.Google Scholar
Moeletsi, ME and Tongwane, MI (2015) 2004 methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management in South Africa. Animals 5, 193–205.Google Scholar
Su, JJ (2015) The use of biotechnology in waste management: biogas. In Tseng, PPS (ed), Agricultural Biotechnology and Global Competitiveness. Report of the APO Asian Food and Agribusiness Conference 2013: Biotechnology and Global Competitiveness. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Productivity Organization (APO), pp. 153–167.Google Scholar
Su, JJ, Liu, YL, Shu, FJ and Wu, JF (1997) Treatment of piggery wastewater by contact aeration treatment in coordination with the anaerobic fermentation of three-step piggery wastewater treatment (TPWT) process in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 32A , 55–73.Google Scholar
Su, JJ, Liu, BY and Chang, YC (2003) Emission of greenhouse gas from livestock waste and wastewater treatment in Taiwan. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95, 253–263.Google Scholar
TNIR (2016) 2015 National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report, Executive Summary. Taipei, Taiwan, ROC: TNIR.Google Scholar
USEPA (2008) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks. Report Number EPA 430-R-08-005. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar