Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:26:18.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irrigating seedling tea in Southern Tanzania: effects on total yields, distribution of yield and water use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. K. V. Carr
M. K. V. Carr
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a dry area of Southern Tanzania with a single rainy season irrigation during the six-month-long dry season (May-November) doubled the total annual yield of tea and at the same time evened its distribution over the year to some extent. Other factors including low temperatures limited growth rates during the period June-September despite irrigation, whilst a lull in production in November appeared to be unrelated to external factors. Roots were traced to depths of about 4·3 m and by the end of the dry season unirrigated bushes were drying the soil below 3m. In general total yields decreased with decreasing frequency of irrigation and quantity of water applied but because these plants were deep rooting they could withstand deficits up to 100 mm without a reduction in yield, equivalent to a loss of about 25% of the total available water in the profile. There was some evidence that the most economical use of water occurred when the soil was not rewetted to field capacity at each irrigation, although yields were then less. Irrigation also reduced the incidence of a stem canker, Phomopsis theae. The implications of these results to the tea industry of East Africa are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 363 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carr, M. K. V. (1970). The role of water in the growth of the tea crop. In Physiology of Tree Crops (ed. Luckwill, L. C. and Cutting, C. V.), pp. 287–305. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1971 a). An assessment of some of the results of tea/soil/water studies in Southern Tanzania. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 21–47. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1971 b). Annual Report of the Tea Research Institute of East Africa, 1970, pp. 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1972 a). The internal water status of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis); some results illustrating the use of the pressure chamber technique. Agricultural Meterorology 9, 447–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1972 b). The climatic requirements of the tea plant; a review. Experimental Agriculture 8, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daog, M. (1970). A study of the water use of tea in East Africa using a hydraulic lysimeter. Agricultural Meteorology 7, 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. O. (1973). The effects of irrigation on the yield of tea. M.Phil. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Fobdham, R. (1971). Stomatal physiology and the water relations of the tea bush. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 89–100. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Garwood, E. A. & Williams, T. E. (1967). Growth, water use and nutrient uptake from the subsoil by grasswards. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, J. E. (1968). The measurement of sap tension in the petioles of apple, raspberry and blackcurrant leaves. Journal of Horticultural Science 43, 231–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, L. W. (1971). The effects of water availability on tea yields in Uganda. Journal of Applied Ecology 8, 791–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, D. N. (1971). Irrigation of tea in Mufindi, Tanzania. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 151–60. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Klepper, B. (1968). Diurnal patterns of water potential in woody plants. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 43, 1931–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laycock, D. H. (1964). An empirical correlation between weather and yearly tea yields in Malawi. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 41, 277–91.Google Scholar
Laycock, D. H. & Wood, R. A. (1963). Some observations on soil moisture use under tea in Nyasaland. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 40, 35–8.Google Scholar
Lebedev, G. V. (1961). The Tea Bush under Irrigation (Russian). Izvestiya Akademi Nauk. S.S.S.R. Moscow.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. S. G. (1956). Tables for the rapid computation of the Penman estimate of evaporation. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 30, 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, 193, 120–45.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. & Hosegood, P. H. (1962). Water use of softwood plantations and bamboo forest. Journal of Soil Science 13, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, H. (1971). A new approach to tea irrigation in Western. Uganda. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 195–212. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Shaxson, T. F. (1971). Making better use of rain. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 177–89. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, J. A. H. (1971). Leaf nutrient content in relation to season and irrigation treatments. In Water and the Tea Plant (ed. , M. K. V. and Carr, S.), pp. 195–212. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Willatt, S. T. (1971). Model of soil water use by tea. Agricultural Meteorology 8, 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willatt, S. T. (1973). Moisture use by irrigated tea in Southern Malawi. In Ecological Studies, Vol. 4. Analysis and Synthesis (ed. Hadas, A. et al. ), pp. 331–8. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar