Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T04:56:34.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions between fungicides, insecticides and spraying regimes in the control of fungal diseases, insect pests and yield of cow pea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. O. Oladiran  and
B. A. Oso
A. O. Oladiran
Affiliation:
Legume Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, P. M. B. 5042, Ibadan, Nigeria
B. A. Oso
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The fungicides benomyl and captafol separately were tank mixed with each of the insecticides decis (decamethrin), permethrin, and cypermethrin (synthetic pyrethroids) and nuvacron (monocrotophos). The mixtures were tested as foliar sprays at three spraying regimes to protect cow-pea plants against pod and foliar diseases and insect pod borers.

Two sprays, 1·5 kg a. i. /ha of benomyl mixed with 0·75 kg a. i. /tia of monocrotophos at 35 and 49 days after planting, gave the best control of brown blotch, web blight, Cercospora leaf spot and the pod borer, Maruca testulalis. This regime also gave the highest grain yield for two consecutive years. The mixtures were not phytotoxic. Interactions between the test fungicides, insecticides and spraying regimes in relation to disease and pest control and yields are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 45 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dina, S. O. (1977). Effects of monocrotophos on insect damage and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in southern Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 13, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dina, S. O. (1979). Synthetic pyrethroids for the control of cowpea insect pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dina, S. O. & Medaiyedun, J. A. (1976). Field tests with insecticides to control Maruca testulalis and pod boring insects of cowpea in southern Nigeria. Journal of Economic Entomology 69, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (1970). Provisional Indicative World Plan for Agricultural Development. Summary and Main Conclusions. 72 pp. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Horn, N. L., Lee, F. N. & Carver, R. B. (1975). Effects of fungicides and pathogens on yields of soybeans. Plant Disease Reporter 59, 724–728.Google Scholar
Ojehomon, O. O. (1970). A comparison of the vegetative growth development and seed yield of three varieties of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. P. (1975). Effects of overhead irrigation and benomyl sprays on late season foliar diseases, seed infection and yield of soybean. Plant Disease Reporter 59, 809–813.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. T. A. (1967). The binomics of Maruca testulalis Gay (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) a major pest of cowpea in Nigeria. Journal of the West African Science Association 12, 111–129.Google Scholar