Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:16:46.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of nutrient supply and plant density in relation to maximal yield of the swede crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. W. Lang
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture
J. C. Holmes
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture

Summary

The effects of changing plant density and nutrient supply on the yield of swedes were measured in nine experiments over 3 years. With small populations, a large nutrient supply was required to reach the maximal yield of roots, but with large plant populations the same nutrient rate depressed yield. This interaction is illustrated by a response surface, and reasons for it are discussed. The interaction is of limited importance in practice because it was small over the range of population and nutrient supply commonly used. Even with small populations, the compensation achieved by applying more fertilizer was uneconomic. On crops with large populations, such as swedes for human consumption, however, the normal recommended rate of fertilizer should not be exceeded because of loss of yield as well as increased cost. More fertilizer and greater plant density were needed to give maximal total yield (roots + tops) than of roots alone. Effects of nutrient supply and plant population on plant establishment and dry-matter content of the swedes are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyle, P. J. (1952). Fodder beet, a review. Mimeograph publication No. 1. Commonw. Bur. Past. Fid Crops, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. (1960). Plant population and crop yield: Part II. Fid Crop Abstr. 13, 247–54.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Adams, S. N. (1966). The effect of sowing date, harvest date and fertilizer rate on sugar beet. Expl Husb. 14, 6574.Google Scholar
Lang, R. W. & Holmes, J. C. (1965). The effect of plant population and distribution on the yield and quality of swedes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edn.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Univ. Press, ch 14 and 15.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Ann. Bot. 22, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar