Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T03:56:55.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction between maize and cowpea at various frequencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. U. Remison
Affiliation:
Agronomy/Physiology Division, National Cereals Research Institute, P. M. B. 5042, Ibadan, Nigeria

Summary

Maize and cowpea were grown at various replacement ratios (100/0, 67/33, 50/50, 33/67 and 0/100) in field experiments. The experiments were carried out during the early growing seasons of 1977 and 1978 at Ibadan in the rainforest zone of Nigeria. A maize cultivar (FARZ 17) and three cowpea cultivars (Ife brown, New Era and TVu 4557) were used.

Maize sown alone gave a greater yield than all mixtures. The yield of New Era cowpea was no less when grown in mixture with maize than when grown alone; indeed when grown in a 50/50 mixture it was significantly greater.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agboola, A. A. & Fayemi, A. A. A. (1972). Fixation and excretion of N by tropical legumes. Agronomy Journal 64, 409412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. N. (1958). Competition between plants of different initial seed size in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 299318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breese, E. L. & Hill, J. (1973). Regression analysis of interactions between competing species. Heredity 31, 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. C. (1974). Effects of intercropping maize with pigeon peas on grain yield and nutrient uptake. Experimental Agriculture 10, 219244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daynard, L. B., Tollenaar, M. & Edmeades, G. O. (1977). Ontario research on maize physiology. Annals of Applied Biology 87, 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wit, C. T. (1960). On competition. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige onderzoekingen 66, 182.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T. & van den Bergh, J. P. (1965). Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 13, 212221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wit, C. T., Ennik, G. C., van den Bergh, J. P. & Sonnerveld, A. (1960). Competition and non-persistency as factors affecting the composition of mixed crops and swards. Proceedings of 8th International Grassland Congress, pp. 736741.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T., Low, P. G. & Ennik, G. C. (1966). Competition between legumes and grass. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige onderzoekingen 687, 130.Google Scholar
England, F. W. (1974). Genotype × environment interactions in mixtures of herbage grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 371376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyi, A. C. (1973). Effects of intercropping maize or sorghum with cowpeas, pigeon peas or beans. Experimental Agriculture 9, 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977 a). Studies in mixed cropping. I. Seasonal differences in relative productivity of crop mixtures and pure stands in the Kenya highlands. Experimental Agriculture 13, 177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977 b). Studies in mixed cropping. II. Population pressures in maize-beans mixtures. Experimental Agriculture 13, 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, C. A., Prager, M. & Laing, D. R. (1978). Genotype × environment interactions in climbing bean cultivars in monoculture and associated with maize. Crop Science 18, 242246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, C. A., Prager, M., Laing, D. R. & Flor, C. A. (1978). Genotype × environment interactions in bush bean cultivars in monoculture and associated with maize. Crop Science 18, 237242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haizel, K. A. (1974). The agronomic significance of mixed cropping. I. Maize interplanted with cowpea. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 7, 169178.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1973). Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. II. Effects of associate plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koli, S. E. (1975). Pure cropping and mixed cropping of maize and groundnuts in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 8, 2330.Google Scholar
Liboon, S. P., Zandstra, H. G. & Price, E. C. (1978). C 171–136 upland rice compared with Dagge in a rice–corn cropping system in the Philippines. International Rice Research Newsletter 3.Google Scholar
Pillay, A. R. (1978). Upland rice interrows of ratoon sugarcane in Mauritius. International Rice Research Newsletter 3.Google Scholar
Remison, S. U. (1978). Neighbour effects between maize and cowpea at varying levels of N and P. Experimental Agriculture 14, 205212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, W. R. & Donald, C. M. (1962). Light relationships in grass clover swards. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 599614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26, 177210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, J. P. (1968). An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige onderzoekingen no. 714.Google Scholar
van den Bergh, J. P. & Elberse, W. Th. (1962). Competition between Lolium perenne L. and Anthoxanthum odoratum L. at two levels of phosphate and potash. Journal of Ecology 50, 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, J. P. & Elberse, W. Th. (1970). Yields of monocultures and mixtures of grass species differing in growth habit. Journal of Applied Ecology 7, 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar