Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:02:21.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Size and Shape of Plots on the Precision of Field Experiments with Potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. H. Justesen
S. H. Justesen
Affiliation:
(Statistical Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A uniformity trial with potatoes was used for investigating the effect of size and shape of plots on the precision of field experiments. Up to a certain limit the S.D. in per cent. of the mean decreases when the size of plots is increased; further increase of plot size increases the errors as a lesser part of the soil variation can be removed.

2. Two-row plots show less variation than either 1 or 3-row plots. This may be explained by row competition.

3. When the area to be used is fixed, smaller plots are more efficient than larger, owing to the greater number of replications in the former case. One exception occurs in the case where border rows are not harvested; here 4-row plots are more efficient than 3-row plots, owing to the fact that a larger part of the soil is included in the calculations when 4-row plots are used.

4. Long and narrow plots are more efficient than shorter and wider of the same size. The only exception is again explained by row competition.

5. In field experiments with potatoes fairly large plots should be used; at least 2 rows wide and preferably long and narrow strips.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1932 , pp. 366 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Brown, B. A.Plot competition in potatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1922), 14, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods for Research Workers, (1925, 3rd edition, 1930). Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
(3)Kirk, L. E. and Goulden, C. H.Some statistical observations on a yield test of potato varieties. Scientific Agriculture (1925), 6, 89.Google Scholar
(4)Kirk, L. E.Field plot technique with potatoes with special reference to the Latin square. Scientific Agriculture (1929), 9, 719.Google Scholar
(5)Mitscherlich, A. E.Feldversuche mit Kartoffeln. Landw. Jahrb. (1919), 54, 703.Google Scholar
(6)Musgrave, Geo. W.Depression of check-row yields by adjoining high yielding plot rows in potatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1924), 16, 633.Google Scholar
(7)Musgrave, Geo. W.A further note on competition in potatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1926), 18, 166.Google Scholar
(8)Myers, C. H. and Perry, F. R.Analysis and interpretation of data obtained in comparative tests of potatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1923), 15, 239.Google Scholar
(9)Stewart, F. C.Experiments with potatoes. Part II. Row competition and border effect. N.Y. State Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. (1924), 518, 30.Google Scholar
(10)Westover, K. C.The influence of plot-size and replication on experimental error in field trials with potatoes. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. (1924), 189, 32 pp.Google Scholar
(11)Wilson, J. and Chittenden, F. J.Some further experiments with potatoes. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. (1919), 44, 83.Google Scholar
Report of the Committee of the American Society of Agronomy for the Standardization of Field Experiments. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1924), 16, and (1930), 22, 1056.Google Scholar