Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:54:13.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vivo measurement of rumen microbial growth using 35S

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. M. Kennedy
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Production, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, P.O. Box 542, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia 4700
J. R. Lindsay
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Production, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, P.O. Box 542, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia 4700
L. P. Milligan
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Production, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, P.O. Box 542, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia 4700

Summary

A method for the measurement of the net rate of synthesis of rumen microbes, entailing separate infusions of 35S-sulphate into the blood and rumen, is described and compared with estimates derived using digesta flow markers. Measurements were made on seven occasions with sheep and on eight occasions with cattle given chopped hay or pelleted hay diets at intervals of 60 or 90 min. Additional measurements were made on two sheep and two cattle given lucerne hay at intervals of 6 or 12 h. Estimates of microbial synthesis using the proposed method for animals fed at intervals of 60 or 90 min were 0·95–1·23 (mean 1·05) that derived using flow markers. For animals fed at intervals of 6 or 12 h the ratio was more variable, 0·91–1·35 (mean 1·17). The agreement between methods tended to be poor in animals with a low rate of irreversible loss of serum sulphate. The proposed method can be accomplished with a low analytical load, and appears to have potential for application in animals fitted with rumen fistulae only, and fed at infrequent intervals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beever, D. E., Harrison, D. G., Thomson, D. J., Cammeix, S. B. & Osbourn, D. F. (1974). A method for the estimation of dietary and miorobial protein in duodenal digesta of ruminants. British Journal of Nutritional, 32 99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1972). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. VI. The digestibility and utilization by sheep of 35S from 36S-labelled ruminal microorganisms. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 25, 195203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1973). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. XII. Nitrogen and sulphur composition of ruminal bacteria. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 26, 14291434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, P. R. & Fountain, R. D. (1970). A method for determination of sulphur in some biological materials. Analyst, London 95, 98102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. 6. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 36(A), 328330.Google Scholar
Downes, A.M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 153162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.). Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. G., Beever, D. E. & Thomson, D. J. (1972). Estimation of food and microbial protein in duodenal digesta. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 60A.Google ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. P. (1973). Intestinal digestion of subterranean clover by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 587598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, I. D. (1974). The proportion of dietary protein escaping degradation in the rumen of sheep fed on various protein concentrates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1978). Quantitative aspects of the transformations of sulphur in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 6584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibholz, J. (1972). Nitrogen metabolism in sheep. II. The flow of amino acids into the duodenum from dietary and microbial sources. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 10731083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, J. C. (1975). The use of re-entrant cannulae to partition digestive function within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W.Warner, A. C. I.). Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Megasrity, R. G. & Siebert, B. D. (1977). Determination of ruthenium in biological material using nameless atomic absorption. Analyst, London 102, 9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M. S. & Green, R. C. (1965). Measurement of low energy beta-emitters in aqueous solution by liquid scintillation counting of emulsions. Analytical Chemistry 37, 854857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, U. B., Varma, A., Verma, D. N., Lal, M. & Ranjhan, S. K. (1973). In vivo measurements of the production rates of bacteria in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 349351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, U. B., Verma, D. N., Varma, A. & Ranjhan, S. K. (1974). Measurements of the rate of production of bacteria in the rumen of buffalo calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). Use of 103-Ru labelled tris (1, 10-phenanthroline) ruthenium (II) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. J. & Nader, C. J. (1975). Measurement in vivo of rumen microbial protein synthesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 689698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar