Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T14:32:14.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heterosis, inbreeding depression and combining abilities in a five-parent diallel of six-row barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. G. Nasr
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
W. Khayrallah
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Summary

The F1 and F2 generations of a diallel cross of six-row barley involving the parents, Beecher, Athenais, Atlas 46, 3130-4564-3, and 3130-864-4 were studied and heterosis, inbreeding depression, and combining abilities were measured for grain yield, number of tillers per plant, number of kernels per plant, kernel weight, and plant height. Significant heterosis was detected for grain yield in two of the ten crosses, for number of tillers per plant in one cross, for number of kernels per plant in two crosses, for plant height in three crosses, and for kernel weight in none of the crosses. The inbreeding depression of the F2 generation was present in most cases but significantly so in a few. Atlas 46 x 3130-4564-3 exhibited inbreeding depression for grain yield, number of kernels per plant, and plant height.

The general combining ability (GCA) mean squares of both generations were significant for all characters studied except number of kernels per plant in the F1 generation. The specific combining ability (SCA) mean squares were significant for only plant height in the F1 generation and all characters studied except number of tillers per plant in the F2 generation.

The GCA effects indicated that Beecher and Athenais are good general combiners for grain yield and its components. The latter parent produced good yielding hybrids with slightly shorter plants than the remaining hybrids.

The SCA effects revealed that Athenais × 3130-4564-3, Athenais × 3130-864-4, and Beecher × Atlas 46 seem good specific combinations for high grain yield. Also, the former two crosses tend to produce shorter plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crook, W. J. & Poehlman, J. M. (1971). Hybrid performance among six-rowed winter barleys Hordeum vulgare L. varying in kernel size. Crop Science 11, 818–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 463–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlish, P. E. & Van Dijk, A. H. (1965). Forage and grain production of four F 1 barley hybrids and their parents. Crop Science 5, 135–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. L. & Lambert, J. W. (1968). Evaluation of early generation testing in spring barley. Crop Science 8, 490–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suneson, C. A. (1962). Hybrid barley promises high yield. Crop Science 2, 410–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suneson, C. A. & Riddle, O. C. (1944). Hybrid vigor in barley. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 36, 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, B. R. & Rasmusson, D. C. (1967). Heterosis and combining ability in barley. Crop Science 7, 644–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar