Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T04:03:44.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth, water use and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. D. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Farming Systems Programme, International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
P. J. M. Cooper
Affiliation:
Farming Systems Programme, International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
A. Y. Allan
Affiliation:
Farming Systems Programme, International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
D. S. H. Drennan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, University of Reading, RG6 2AS
J. D. H. Keatinge
Affiliation:
Farming Systems Programme, International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria

Summary

Relations between yield, water use and pre-anthesis growth were analysed for cropsof barley grown for three seasons at several sites in northern Syria. The relations obtained were compared with those for other cereal crops grown in similar regions of Mediterranean climates.

Phosphorus fertilizer application increased the rate of crop development from emergence to floral initiation and advanced anthesis by up to 11 days. Grain and total shoot dry-matter yields were increased by fertilizer (nitrogen + phosphorus) applications at all sites in all years, in most cases without increasing total evapotranspiration. The increased dry matter at anthesis was produced without having used a larger proportion of the total evapotranspiration in the whole season. Consequently, the ratio of grain yield to total above-ground dry-matter yield (harvest index) and kernel weight were also relatively stable between sites and years, despite some very low amounts of post-anthesis water use. Grain yield appeared to be largely determined by anthesis and there were strong linear relationships between grain yield or total dry-matter yield and number of kernels. Differences in water use efficiency of crops given fertilizer between sites and years were closely related to the differences in amounts of winter growth.

Some responses differed from those predicted from models of growth, water use and yield developed in other regions with similar climates. It is concluded that agronomists and breeders should increase amounts of early growth thereby increasing grain and dry-matter yields. Future research emphasis should also be on the development of dynamic simulation models of pre-anthesis growth and water use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angus, J. F., Mackenzie, D. H., Morton, R. & Schafer, C. A. (1981). Phasic development in field crops. II. Thermal and photoperiodic responses of spring wheat. Field Crops Research 4, 269283.Google Scholar
Arnon, I. (1975). Physiological principles of dryland farming. In Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming (ed. Gupta, U.S.), pp. 3145. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Barracxough, P. B. & Leigh, R. A. (1984). The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: the effect of sowing date and soil types on root growth of high yielding crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 5974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bldinger, F., Musgrave, R. B. & Flsoher, R. A. (1977). Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature (London) 270, 431433.Google Scholar
Brown, S. C., Keatinge, J. D. H., Greoory, P. J. & Cooper, P. J. M. (1987). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria. 1. Root and shoot growth. Field Crops Research (in the Press).Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M. (1983). Crop management in rainfed agriculture with special reference to water use efficiency. In Nutrient Balances and the Need for Fertilizers in Semi-Arid and Arid Regions. Proceedings of the 17th colloquium of the International Potash Institute held in Rabat and Marrakech/Morocco, pp. 6379.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Gregory, P. J., Keatinoe, J. D. H. & Brown, S. C. (1987). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria. 2. Soil water dynamics and crop water use. Field Crops Research (in the Press).Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Hughes, G. (1983). Crop evapotranspiration - a technique for calculation of its components by field measurements. Field Crops Research 7, 299312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, M. D., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Rodgers, J. A. (1984). A comparison of rainfall regimes at six sites in northern Syria. Agricidtural and Forest Meteorology 31, 319328.Google Scholar
Dennett, M. D., Rodgers, J. A. & Keatinge, J. D. H. (1983). Simulation of a rainfall record for the site of a new agricultural development: an example from northern Syria. Agricultural Meteorology 29, 247258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, A. D. & Fischer, R. A. (1979). Water use relationship to dry matter accumulation in the wheat crop. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 815829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elus, R. P. & Russell, G. (1984). Plant development and grain yield of spring and winter barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 8595.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1979). Growth and water limitation to dryland wheat yield in Australia: a physiological framework. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 45, 8394.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1981). Optimizing the use of water and nitrogen through breeding of crops. Plant and Soil 58, 249278.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (1969). Freedom From Hunger Campaign Fertilizer programme. Consoli-dated review of trial and demonstration results, 1961–1962, 1965–1966. Report LA: FFHC/69/9 WS/94417. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
French, R. J. & Schultz, J. E. (1984). Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743764.Google Scholar
French, R. J., Schultz, J. E. & Rudd, C. L. (1979). Effect of time of sowing on wheat phenology in South Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 8996.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). A physiological analysis of cereal yield. II. Partitioning of dry matter. Agricultural Progress 53, 5169.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Shepherd, K. D. & Cooper, P. J. (1984). Effects of fertilizer on root growth and water use of barley in northern Syria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 429438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, K., Shepherd, K. D. & Allan, A. Y. (1983). Crop response to nitrogen and phosphorus in rainfed agriculture. In Nutrient Balances and the Need for Fertilizers in Semi-Arid and Arid Regions. Proceedings of the 17th colloquium of the International Potash Institute held in Rabat and Marrakech/Morocco, pp. 223248.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. & Parsons, I. T. (1981). Plant Growth Analysis. User's instructions for the stepwise and spline programs. Published by Natural Environment Research Council, Unit of Comparative Ecology, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (1982). In ICARDA Annual Report 1982. Project IV Livestock in the Farming Systems, pp. 4352. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. L. (1977). Fertilizer needs for developing countries. International Symposium on Rainfed Agriculture in Semi-arid Regions. Proceedings, pp. 541551. University of California, Riverside, California.Google Scholar
Kassam, A. H. (1981). Climate, soil and land resources in North Africa and West Asia. Plant and Soil 58, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepper, B., Belford, R. K. & Rickman, R. W. (1984). Root and shoot development in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 76, 117122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Plant Pathology 3, 128129.Google Scholar
O'leary, G. J., Connor, D. J. & White, D. H. (1985). A simulation model of the development, growth and yield of the wheat crop. Agricultural Systems 17, 126.Google Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1972). The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 745752.Google Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1976). Physiology of grain yield in wheat growing on stored water. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 3, 559565.Google Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1977). Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 43, 117120.Google Scholar
Perrin De Brichambaut, G. & Wallen, C. C. (1963). A study of the agro-climatology in semi-arid and arid zones of the Near East. WMO Technical Note 56, 64pp. Geneva.Google Scholar
Ramos, J. M., Garcia Del Moral, L. F. & Recalde, L. (1985). Vegetative growth of winter barley in relation to environmental conditions and grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 413419.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. (1983). Manipulation of leaf area and its effect on grain yield in droughted wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. (1974). Atmospheric and soil water influences on the plant water balance. Agricultural Meteorology 14, 183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. (1981). Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Plant and Soil 58, 8196.Google Scholar
Shepherd, K. D. (1985). Growth and yield of barley in Mediterranean-type environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sillanpaa, M. (1982). Micronutrients and the nutrient status of soils: a global study. FAO Soils Bulletin 48. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Smith, R. C. G. & Harris, H. C. (1981). Environmental resources and restraints to agricultural production in a Mediterranean-type environment. Plant and Soil 58, 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, C. B. & Sinclair, T. R. (1983). Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search. In Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production (ed. Taylor, H. M., Jordan, W. R. and Sinclair, T. R.), pp. 127. Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Turner, N. C. & Bbgg, J. E. (1981). Plant water relations and adaptation to stress. Plant and Soil 58, 97132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, J., Drees, E. M. & Penning De Vries, F. W. T. (1982). Modelling of post-floral growth of wheat. In Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production (ed. Vries, F. W. T. Penning de and Laar, H. H. van), pp. 144151. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, K. & Williams, C. H. (1953). The residual effect of superphosphate in soils cultivated for wheat in South Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 4, 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worzella, W. W. (1967). Beecher-a Dryland Barley. Publication No. 28, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, American University of Beirut.Google Scholar