Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:34:30.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and nitrogen dynamics of spring chickpea genotypes in a Mediterranean-type climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S. D. KOUTROUBAS ,
M. PAPAGEORGIOU  and
S. FOTIADIS
S. D. KOUTROUBAS*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Development, Democritus University of Thrace, Orestiada, Greece
M. PAPAGEORGIOU
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Foundations, Cereal Institute, P. O. Box. 60411, Thessaloniki, Greece
S. FOTIADIS
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Development, Democritus University of Thrace, Orestiada, Greece
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: skoutrou@agro.duth.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important legume of rainfed farming systems, contributing to the sustainability of production and reducing the need for nitrogen (N) fertilization through fixing atmospheric N2. The relative importance of factors causing variations in growth, seed yield, N accumulation and N utilization efficiency among spring chickpea varieties grown in a Mediterranean-type climate was investigated in field experiments conducted in 2003 and 2004. Five chickpea varieties were grown in a silty clay soil in the farm of the Democritus University of Thrace in Orestiada, Greece. Yearly differences in plant growth and productivity were observed and were mainly associated with the variations in the weather parameters between the growing seasons. Nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) for biomass production during the seed-filling period was higher compared with that during the vegetative period. NUE for seed yield (SY) ranged from 18·3 to 24·5 g dry matter (DM)/g N and was positively correlated with seed yield, suggesting that high SY was associated with more efficient exploitation of N. When the environmental conditions favoured high early N accumulation, the differences among varieties in NUE were mainly due to the differences in N partitioning at maturity, e.g. the nitrogen harvest index (NHI). The amount and the efficiency of N content at the beginning of seed growth (growth stage (GS) R5) that was translocated to the seed differed among varieties and ranged from 7·0 to 16·6 g N/m2 and from 68·2 to 86·8 g DM/g N, respectively. Most of the variation (0·96) between varieties in N translocation could be accounted for by the differences in total N content at GS R5. N losses from the plant foliage between 0·61 and 9·92 g N/m2 were detected during the seed-filling period when SY was low and N content at GS R5 was high.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 4 , August 2009 , pp. 445 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L. & Taylor, M. (1980). Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beech, D. F. & Leach, G. J. (1988). Response of chickpea accessions to row spacing and plant density on a vertisol on the Darling Downs, south-eastern Queensland. 1. Dry matter production and seed yield. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Total nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Agronomy 9 (Eds Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., Ensuinger, L. E., White, J. K. & Clark, F. F.), pp. 1149–1178. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Davies, S. L., Turner, N. C., Palta, J. A., Siddique, K. H. M. & Plummer, J. A. (2000). Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen supports seed filling in chickpea subjected to water deficit. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 855–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, L. A. & Weaver, R. W. (1986). Partitioning of nitrogen-15-labeled biologically fixed nitrogen and nitrogen-15-labeled nitrate in cowpea during pod development. Agronomy Journal 78, 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. (1982). Symbiosis, nitrogen and dry matter distribution in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Experimental Agriculture 18, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1993). Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egli, D. B., Meckel, L., Phillips, R. E., Radcliffe, D. & Leggett, J. E. (1983). Moisture stress and N redistribution in soybean. Agronomy Journal 75, 1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T. & Pennington, J. S. (1971). Stage of development descriptions for soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science 11, 929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, L. A., Sharpe, R. R., Langdale, G. W. & Giddens, J. E. (1987). Nitrogen cycling in a wheat crop: soil, plant and aerial nitrogen transport. Agronomy Journal 79, 965–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliadis, C. (2001). Evaluation of six chickpea varieties for seed yield under autumn and spring sowing. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 137, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, J., Yamamoto, Y., Wang, Y. L., Shan, Y. H., Dong, G. C., Yoshida, T. & Miyazaki, A. (2006). Genotypic differences in grain yield, and nitrogen absorption and utilization in recombinant inbred lines of rice under hydroponic culture. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 52, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. T., Bacon, R. K. & Wells, B. R. (1995). Genetic variability in nitrogen utilization at four growth stage in soft red winter wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18, 969–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutroubas, S. D. & Ntanos, D. A. (2003). Genotypic differences for grain yield and nitrogen utilization in Indica and Japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 83, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutroubas, S. D., Papageorgiou, M. & Fotiadis, S. (2008). Genotypic variation for nitrogen accumulation and translocation in spring sown chickpea under Mediterranean conditions. Italian Journal of Agronomy 3 (Supplement 3), 341–342.Google Scholar
Koutroubas, S. D., Papakosta, D. K. & Doitsinis, A. (2004). Cultivar and seasonal effects on the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to safflower yield. Field Crops Research 90, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutroubas, S. D., Papakosta, D. K. & Gagianas, A. A. (1998). The importance of early dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in soybean yield. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdali, F. (1996). Nitrogen and phosphorus assimilation, mobilization and partitioning in rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Field Crops Research 47, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdali, F., Kalifa, K. & Al-Shamma, M. (1997). Cultivar differences in nitrogen assimilation, partitioning and mobilization in rain-fed grown lentil. Field Crops Research 54, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyei-Boahen, S., Slinkard, A. E. & Walley, F. L. (2002). Evaluation of Rhizobial inoculation methods for chickpea. Agronomy Journal 94, 851–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Gouis, J., Delebarre, O., Beghin, D., Heumez, E. & Pluchard, P. (1999). Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of two-row winter barley cultivars grown at two N levels. European Journal of Agronomy 10, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leport, L., Turner, N. C., French, R. J., Tennant, D., Thomson, B. D. & Siddique, K. H. M. (1998). Water relations, gas-exchange, and growth of cool-season grain legumes in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, R. S. & Connor, D. J. (1992). Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Bellido, F. J., López-Bellido, R. J., Khalil, S. K. & López-Bellido, L. (2008). Effect of planting date on winter kabuli chickpea growth and yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy Journal 100, 957–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, R. S., Blake, T., Abd El-Moneim, A. M., Erskine, W., Sarker, A., Saxena, M. C., Thomas, R. & Afandi, F. A. (2004). Improved livelihoods from legumes – a review of BNF research at the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation – Prospects for Enhanced Application in Tropical Agriculture (Ed. Serraj, R.), pp. 99–112. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing.Google Scholar
May, L., Van Sanford, D. A., MacKown, C. T. & Cornelius, P. L. (1991). Genetic variation for nitrogen use in soft red×hard red winter wheat populations. Crop Science 31, 626–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J. & Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal 74, 562–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omoigui, L. O., Alabi, S. O. & Kamara, A. Y. (2007). Response of low-N pool maize population to nitrogen uptake and use efficiency after three cycles of full-sib recurrent selection. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oweis, T., Hachum, A. & Pala, M. (2004). Water use efficiency of winter-sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management 66, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papakosta, D. & Gagianas, A. A. (1991). Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal 83, 864–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papakosta, D. K. (1994). Analysis of wheat cultivar differences in grain yield, grain nitrogen yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 172, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W. J., Morgan, J. A., Altenhofen, J. M. & Harper, L. A. (1988). Ammonia volatilization from spring wheat plants. Agronomy Journal 80, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, K. M. U. & van Laere, A. J. (1992). Ammonium and amino acid metabolism in excised leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum) senescing in the dark. Physiologia Plantarum 84, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phakamas, N., Patanothai, A., Pannangpetch, K., Jogloy, S. & Hoogenboom, G. (2008). Seasonal responses and genotype-by-season interactions for the growth dynamic and development traits of peanut. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przulj, N. & Momcilovic, V. (2001). Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley. II. Nitrogen translocation. European Journal of Agronomy 15, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarker, A. & Erskine, W. (2006). Recent progress in the ancient lentil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarno, R., Stringi, L., Amato, G. & Crivello, M. (1987). Effects of sowing time on yield and its components in some chickpea genotypes. In La Coltura Del Cece in Italia (Ed. Crino, P.), pp. 132–139. Rome: Atti della Giornata tenutasi presso il Centro Ricerche Energia della Casaccia.Google Scholar
Siddique, K. H. M., Beldford, R. K., Perry, M. W. & Tennant, D. (1989). Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 473–487.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & DeWit, C. T. (1975). Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189, 565–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, K. B. (1997). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research 53, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, K. B., Malhotra, R. S., Saxema, M. C. & Bejiga, G. (1997). Superiority of winter sowing over traditional spring sowing of chickpea in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy Journal 89, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, A., Hammer, G. L., Torabi, B., Robertson, M. J. & Zeinali, E. (2006 a). Modeling chickpea growth and development: phonological development. Field Crops Research 99, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, A., Robertson, M. J. & Manshadi, A. M. (2006 b). Modeling chickpea growth and development: Nitrogen accumulation and use. Field Crops Research 99, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stutte, C. A., Weilans, R. T. & Blem, A. R. (1979). Gaseous nitrogen loss from soybean foliage. Agronomy Journal 71, 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, B. D. & Siddique, K. H. M. (1997). Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments. II. Canopy development, radiation interception and dry matter production. Field Crops Research 54, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, B. D., Siddique, K. H. M., Barr, M. D. & Wilson, J. M. (1997). Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments. I. Phenology and seed yield. Field Crops Research 54, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ginkel, M., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Trethowan, R. & Hernandez, E. (2001). Methodology for selecting segregating populations for improved N-use efficiency in bread wheat. Euphytica 119, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Gan, Y. T., Clarke, F. & McDonald, C. L. (2006). Response of chickpea yield to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Science 46, 2171–2178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar