Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T07:23:17.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and muscle development of steers implanted with hexoestrol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. C. Everitt  and
A. H. Carter
G. C. Everitt
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand
A. H. Carter
Affiliation:
Ruakura Animal Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A muscle biopsy technique was employed in an experiment designed to assess the effects of hexoestrol implantation on 2-year-old and 6-year-old Aberdeen Angus steers under New Zealand grazing conditions. This paper reports the results concerning live-weight gains, carcass weights and detailed analyses of samples of m. semitendinosus and associated subcutaneous fat.

There was some evidence of an adverse effect of the biopsy operation on the older, less tractable, animals, despite the observation of no apparent effect of repeated muscle biopsies in a preliminary trial with sheep.

Hexoestrol implantation, of four 15 mg. pellets for the 2-year-old steers and six 15 mg. pellets for the 6-year-olds, led to significant increases in live weight gains during the later part of the trial only, and reduced the dressing-out percentage of the younger animals. Although there were indications of a positive response in carcass weight to hexoestrol implantation, it was concluded that, under the conditions of this experiment, implantation of relatively large dosages was not economically justified in terms of increased meat production.

Absorption of the implanted pellets varied from 42 to 85% of the total dosage, but evidenced little association with live weight changes.

Deposition of subcutaneous fat appeared to be reduced under the hormone treatment, but the responses in this respect of the 6-year-old steers were highly variable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1961 , pp. 213 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, J. N. & Crichton, J. A. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 220.Google Scholar
Averill, R. L. W. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 18.Google Scholar
Bindloss, A. A. (1958). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 39.Google Scholar
Brady, D. E. (1937). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 30th Ann. Meet., p. 246.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. D. & Lamming, G. E. (1960). Anim. Prod. 2, 93.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. & Finney, D. J. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casida, L. E., Andrews, F. N., Bogart, R., Clegg, M. T. & Nalbandov, A. V. (1959). Hormonal Relationships and Applications in the Production of Meats, Milk, and Eggs. Nat. Aoad. Sci., Nat. Res. Coun., Publication no. 714.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1957). Agric. Rev. 11, 23.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1959). Anim. Prod. 1, 175.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1959). Proc. Ruakura Farmers' Conf. 20, p. 25.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1960 a). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 58.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1960 b). Bull. Inst. Meat, 13, 2.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1960 c). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Ewing, T. V., Weight, L. H. & Burk, L. B. (1918). Res. Bull. Tex. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 226.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. R. (1952). Data on relative absorption rates of subcutaneous pellets of steroid hormones in rats. In Ciba Foundation Colloquia on Endocrinology, vol. III, p. 263. Ed. Wolstenholme, . London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Hale, W. H., Sherman, W. C., White, E. A., Kuhn, G., Schnell, R. B., Reynolds, W. M. & Luther, H. G. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1201.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1940 a). Farm Animals: their Breeding, Growth and Inheritance. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1940 b). Chem. Ind. 59, 521.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. & Appleton, A. B. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Harrison, Dorothy L., Visser, Rosemary & Schirmer, Loreta S. (1959). Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Publ., no. 208.Google Scholar
Herrick, E. H. (1945). Anat. Rec. 93, 145.Google Scholar
Hiner, R. L., Hankins, O. G., Sloane, H. S., Fellers, C. R. & Anderson, E. E. (1953). Food Res. 18, 364.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1954). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., p. 49.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956 a). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 59.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956 b). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956 c). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956 d). Colon. Pl. Anim. Prod. 6, 79.Google Scholar
Lehmer, E. (1944). Ann. Math. Statist. 15, 388.Google Scholar
Lorenz, F. W. (1953). Hormonal Relationships and Applications in the Production of Meats, Milk and Eggs. Nat. Res. Coun., Agric. Board, Publication no. 266, p. 5.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. (1958). Proc. Ruakura Farmers' Conf., p. 110.Google Scholar
Malpress, F. H. (1952). Absorption data from tablet implantation experiments in ruminants. In Ciba Foundation Colloquia on Endocrinology, vol. III, p. 283. Ed. Wolstenholme, . London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Meara, P. J. (1947). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 21, 329.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. A. & Slen, S. B. (1959). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 39, 202.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940–1941). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276; 31, 1.Google Scholar
N.Z. Meat Producers' Board (1960). N.Z. Meat Producers' Board Annual Report.Google Scholar
N.Z. Meat and Wool Board Econ. Serv. (1960). New Zealand Meat and Wool Board Economic Service. Annual Review of the Sheep Industry, 1959–1960.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. & Gee, Isoline (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 158.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Greenhalgh, Isoline & MacLeod, N. A. (1960). Anim. Prod. 2, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. D. & Baker, D. D. (1933). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 200.Google Scholar
Sartorius, M. & Child, A. M. (1938). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 131.Google Scholar
Shimkin, M. B., Lorenz, E., Wyman, R. & Norton, S. G. (1944). Endocrinology, 35, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Marion, Clegg, M. T. & Carrol, Floyd (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 834.Google Scholar
Smith, R. G. C. (1958). Agric. Rev. 3, 29.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1954). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 3.Google Scholar
Walker, Daintry E. K. (1960). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Doty, D. M., Beard, F. J., Pierce, J. C. & Hankins, O. G. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 97.Google Scholar
Waters, H. J. (1909). Proc. 30th Ann. Meet. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. Portland, Oregon, p. 70.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D., Batterman, W. E., Sorensen, D. K., Kowalczyk, J. & Bray, R. W. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar