Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T22:55:41.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field investigations into the manurial value of liquid undigested sewage sludge when applied to grassland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. G. Coker ,
J. E. Hall ,
C. H. Carlton-Smith  and
R. D. Davis
E. G. Coker
Affiliation:
Water Research Centre, Medmenham Laboratory, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 2HD
J. E. Hall
Affiliation:
Water Research Centre, Medmenham Laboratory, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 2HD
C. H. Carlton-Smith
Affiliation:
Water Research Centre, Medmenham Laboratory, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 2HD
R. D. Davis
Affiliation:
Water Research Centre, Medmenham Laboratory, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 2HD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two sets of experiments were carried out during 1978–82 in order to compare the value of nitrogen in liquid undigested sludge (LUDS) with that in ‘Nitro-Chalk’. One set took place in the area of north Hertfordshire-south Bedfordshire, and the other at the University of Leeds. In the first growing season after application the relative effectiveness of LUDS-N was about 20%. In subsequent years it was about 40% though it was less on a soil initially very deficient in soil-N. At Leeds the 2nd-year value was 60–75%.

In the growing season immediately following treatment, N mineralized from LUDS became available too late to increase D.M. yields greatly; much of this appeared to be retained in the turf mat and increased the yield of D.M. the following year. When the lower 1st-year responses were taken into account there did not appear to be any yield penalty in making autumn (November) applications, compared with spring (February). This overall result concealed differences between soils.

In a year when it was dry during the main growing period yields were reduced by about 25%. It seems that LUDS-N is most valuable when it is applied regularly to the same area, and in the wetter parts of the country. Much LUDS comes from smaller rural sewage treatment works which are much less likely to carry contamination from potentially toxic elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 479 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackman, G. E. (1936). The influence of temperature and available nitrogen supply on the growth of pasture in the spring. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 26, 620–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaussod, R. (1981). Valeur fertilisante azotée des boues résiduaires. ‘Characterisation, Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge’, Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on the Characterization and Use of Sewage Sludge, Vienna, 1980 pp. 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, E. G. & Carlton-Smith, C. H. (1986). Phosphorus in sewage sludges as a fertiliser. Waste Management and Research 4, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, E. G., Davis, R. D., Hall, J. E. & Carlton-Smith, C. H. (1982). Field experiments on the use of consolidated sewage sludge for land reclamation; effects on crop yield and composition and soil conditions. Technical Report 183, Water Research Centre, WRc Environment, Medmenham, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment-National Water Council (1981). Report of the sub-committee on the disposal of sewage sludge to land. Standing Technical Committee Report No. 20.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1978). The use of sewage sludge as a fertiliser. Advisory Leaflet No. 51. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). The analysis of agricultural materials. Bulletin RB 427. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Petts, K. W. & Belcher, M. (1980). An automated method for the simultaneous determination of nitrogen and phosphorus in plant, sludge and soil. Water Pollution Control 79, 399–404.Google Scholar
Porch, D., Bayley, R. W. & Bruce, A. M. (1977). Economic aspects of sewage sludge disposal. Technical Report 42, Water Research Centre, WRc Environment, Medmenham, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Walker, T. W., Orchiston, H. D. & Adams, A. F. R. (1954). The nitrogen economy of grass-legume associations. Journal of the British Grassland Society 9, 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. C. (1970). The role of nitrogen in grassland productivity. Grassland Research Institute Bulletin 48. Hurley: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Williams, T. E. & Jackson, M. V. (1976). Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen in herbage and in soil. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Technical Bulletin 32, pp. 145–152. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Yorkshire Water Authority (1980). Sludge recycling code.Google Scholar