Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T23:40:22.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feed intake and liveweight responses to nitrogen and/or protein supplements by steers of Bos taurus, Bos indicus and Bos taurus × Bos indicus breed types offered a low quality grass hay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2000

D. W. HENNESSY
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, Grafton, NSW 2460, Australia
P. J. WILLIAMSON
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, Grafton, NSW 2460, Australia
R. E. DARNELL
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Advisory Station, Grafton, NSW 2460, Australia Present address: Department of Statistics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

Abstract

Thirty steers were used in two pen experiments (Expts 1 and 2), and 27 of these in a third (Expt 3), to quantify their responses of hay intake, rumen ammonia nitrogen (RAN) concentrations, and liveweight to inputs of rumen soluble nitrogen (urea) and rumen undegradable protein (formaldehyde-treated casein; F-casein) when added to a basal diet of low quality hays. The hays were made from unimproved native pastures typical of those grazed by cattle in the subtropics of Australia and contained 7·8 g N/kg dry matter (DM) with coefficient of organic matter digestibility of 0·503 in Expts 1 and 2, and 5·2 g N/kg DM with a digestibility range from 0·385 to 0·448 in Expt 3. The steers (15 months old) were either Brahman (B), Hereford (H) or the F1 Brahman×Hereford (BH) cross. Steers were offered supplementary minerals with the hays in each experiment. In Expt 1 (35 days) urea was sprayed on part of the hay, allowing for daily urea intakes (g/steer) of either 0, 5, 11, 16 or 26. In Expt 2 (42 days), F-casein was offered daily (g/steer) at either 0, 75, 150, 225 or 300 and in Expt 3 (56 days) discrete offerings were made of soluble casein (225 g/day), of urea (18 g/day)+F-casein (225 g/day) or of nil.

There were significant linear effects of urea intake upon hay intake and liveweight change of steers. However, B steers had smaller increases in intake and liveweight change than did H steers, and B steers did not have a linear increase in RAN concentrations with increasing urea intake as did H and BH steers. In Expt 2 there were significant linear effects of F-casein supplements on hay intake and liveweight change of steers and a significant improvement in their feed conversion ratio (i.e. DM intake: liveweight change). The B steers did not differ from H and BH steers in liveweight change but had significantly lower hay intakes and non-significantly smaller increases in RAN with increasing F-casein intake. In Expt 3, hay intake of the steers increased with soluble casein (by 16·8%) and with urea+F-casein (24·5%). Only steers given urea+F-casein had a high RAN concentration (94 mg/l) and a high liveweight gain. The B steers had a liveweight loss and a lower hay intake than H or BH steers in Expt 3 but a higher RAN concentration.

These studies have indicated the importance of the form and quantity of additional N required by cattle of differing breed types to optimize their feed intake and liveweight gain when offered low-N, low-digestible hays.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)