Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:07:31.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faecal sampling for the estimation of herbage intake using n-alkanes: evaluation of sample pooling and the use of rectal grab samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. A. Vulich  and
J. P. Hanrahan
S. A. Vulich
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway, Republic of Ireland
J. P. Hanrahan
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Belclare, Tuam, Co Galway, Republic of Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Herbage intake estimation, using the n-alkane technique, requires the determination of the ratio of ‘dosed’ to ‘natural’ n-alkane concentrations in faeces. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of intake estimates based on the analysis of pooled samples of total daily faecal output and those derived from rectal grab samples.

Wether lambs maintained in individual metabolism crates, offered fresh herbage ad libitumand dosed daily with 120 mg of n-dotriacontane (C32), were used. Actual intake was recorded daily and samples of total faecal output were retained either for individual analysis or to produce 6-day composites by pooling representative amounts of material from each day's faecal output. Different pooling strategies were evaluated: a constant volume of fresh faecal material from each day or a constant weight (or constant volume) of dried and ground material from each day's faecal output. In addition, daily rectal grab samples, obtained at the same time each day, were pooled using a constant daily volume of fresh faeces. Herbage intake was estimated using the ratios of faecal concentrations of n-hentriacontane (C31) or n-tritriacontane (C33) relative to that for C32.

Similar patterns of effects were observed for intake estimates derived from the C31: C32 and C33:C32 n-alkane ratios for the different faecal sample types. Comparisons based on intake estimates derived from the use of the C33: C32 ratio showed that there were no significant differences between actual intake and estimates based either on the mean of daily samples or on the different composites of total daily faecal output. Intake estimates based on the analysis of composites of total daily faecal output were consistently lower (c. 3%) than those based on the analysis of daily faecal samples. A difference of this magnitude is expected, based on the algebraic relationship between the mean of a ratio of two variables (e.g. faecal concentrations of C33 and C32) and the ratio of the corresponding means. Intake estimates derived from the use of rectal grab samples, taken 3 h after the daily dose was given, yielded a proportionate overestimation of actual intake of 0·06 (P < 0·10). No significant differences were detected in the precision of intake estimates derived either from individual daily samples, composites of total daily faecal output, or composites of rectal grab samples, although the latter yielded the lowest precision.

It is concluded that faecal samples can be pooled on a gravimetric or a volumetric basis over several days with negligible loss in precision of intake estimates. Such pooling greatly reduces the workload and costs involved in using the n-alkane technique. Sampling and analytical errors associated with t e technique were found to be very small, and the processing of faecal samples in duplicate would result in a negligible increase in the precision of intake estimates. The need for further evaluation of rectal grab sampling under grazing conditions is highlighted.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dove, H., Mayes, R. W., Freer, M., Coombe, J. B. & Foot, J. Z. (1989). Faecal recoveries of the alkanes of plant cuticular waxes in penned and in grazed sheep. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Grassland Congress, Nice, pp. 1093–1094.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. & Colgrove, P. M. (1986). The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1897). Mathematical contribution to the theory of evolution - on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), B60, 489–498.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulich, S. A. (1990). Preparation of capsules for the dosing of n-alkanes used to estimate feed intake in sheep. In Animal Production Research Report 1988–89, pp. 196–197. Dublin: Teagase.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. (1991). The use of different matrix types for dosing n-alkanes in liquid form in sheep. In Animal Production Research Report 1990, pp. 143–144. Dublin: Teagase.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1990). Determination of herbage and faecal n-alkane contents: sources of sampling variation. In Proceedings of the Vllth European Grazing Workshop, Wageningen, The Netherlands (Ed. Agricultural University, Department of Field Crops and Grassland Science, Wageningen), Paper TH 4.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1992). Estimation of intake by the grazing animal with special reference to the n-alkane technique. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Madrid, Spain, Paper S3.1.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., Hanrahan, J. P. & O'Riordan, E. G. (1990). Variation of intake at pasture: differences among breeds of sheep of different mature size. In Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Edinburgh (Eds Hill, W. G., Thompson, R. & Woolliams, J. A.), Vol. 15, pp. 57–60.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O'Riordan, E. G. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1991 a). Use of n-alkanes for the estimation of herbage intake in sheep: accuracy and precision of the estimates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O'Riordan, E. G. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1991 b). Effect of litter size on herbage intake at pasture by ewes and their progeny. Animal Production 53, 191–197.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., Hanrahan, J. P. & Crowley, B. A. (1995). Modification of the analytical procedures for the determination of herbage and faecal n-alkanes used in the estimation of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar