Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T17:14:44.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the efficiency of urea for pot-grown ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Catherine J. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland

Extract

Urea can be an inefficient nitrogen source, compared with ammonium nitrate, on calcareous soils (Ernst & Massey, 1960) and under dry conditions (Murphy, 1978) as a result of ammonia volatilization. However, the interaction between factors which can affect the performance of urea is not clearly understood. The risk of ammonia volatilization would appear to be higher on light soils with a low cation exchange capacity than on heavier soils (Fenn & Hossner, 1985). Field trials in the Netherlands indicated that a minimum of 5 mm of rain must fall within 2 days of application to give good dry-matter yields with urea (Van Burg, Dilz & Prins, 1982). In addition ammonia volatilization has been affected by initial soil moisture content in some studies (Fenn & Escarzaga, 1977) but not in others (Gasser, 1964).

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouwmeester, R. J. B., Vlek, P. L. G. & Stumpe, J. M. (1985). Effect of environmental factors on ammonia volatilization from a urea-fertilized soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 376381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmeades, D. C., Judd, M. & Sarathchandra, S. U. (1981). The effect of lime on nitrogen mineralization as measured by grass growth. Plant and Soil 60, 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, J. W. & Massey, H. F. (1960). The effects of several factors on volatilization of ammonia formed from urea in the soil. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 24, 8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, L. B. & Escarzaoa, R. (1977). Ammonia volatilization from surface applications of ammonium compounds to calcareous soils. VI. Effects of initial soil water contents and quantity of applied water. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 358363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, L. B. & Hossner, L. R. (1985). Ammonia volatilization from ammonium or ammonium-forming nitrogen fertilizers. In Advances in Soil Science(ed. Stewart, B. A.), vol. 1, pp. 123169. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1964). Some factors affecting losses of ammonia from urea and ammonium sulphate applied to soils. Journal of Soil Science 15, 258272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1979). Fertilizer Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Murphy, W. R. (1978). Testing urea as a source of nitrogen. Farm and Food Research 9, 118119.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. M., Wolf, D. C. & Armbruster, J. A. (1985). Factors related to urea hydrolysis in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 104108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, R. R. & Goh, K. M. (1985). Dynamics of ammonia volatilization from simulated urine patches and aqueous urea applied to pasture. III. Field verification of a simplified model. Fertilizer Research 6, 2336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, G. L. (1979). Volatilization losses of nitrogen as ammonia from surface-applied fertilizers, organic amendments, and crop residues. Advances in Agronomy 31, 189223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J., Dilz, K. & Prins, W. H. (1982). Netherlands Nitrogen Technical Bulletin 13, Agricultural Bureau of the Netherlands Fertilizer Industry, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J. & Rauw, G. J. G. (1972). Stikstofwerking van ureum op grasland. Stikstof 71, 466475.Google Scholar
Watson, C. J. & Adams, S. N. (1986). Effect of simulated wet spring conditions on the relative efficiency of three forms of nitrogen fertilizer on grassland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 219222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar