Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:24:24.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Estimation of the Efficiency of Sampling, with Special Reference to Sampling for Yield in Cereal Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Yates
Affiliation:
(Statistical Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)
I. Zacopanay
Affiliation:
(Statistical Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.)

Extract

The estimation of the experimental yields of cereal crops by sampling methods is considered in the light of results of eighteen experiments which were harvested by these methods at Rothamsted and its associated centres. The harvesting results of the Crop-Weather series of experiments are also included.

A preliminary discussion of the interpretation of the analysis of variance as applied to sampling results is given, and an expression is found for the loss of information arising out of sampling. The results of the discussion are applicable to all types of sampling carried out on replicated experiments.

The sampling and experimental errors of all the experiments have been calculated. The variation between sampling units in the same subplot (usually between l/100th and l/200th acre) was found to be such as would arise if each metre length of row had a standard deviation (about the plot mean) of the order of 25–30 per cent. of the mean yield.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Clapham, A. R.J. agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Clapham, A. R.J. agric. Sci. (1931), 21, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Clapham, A. R.J. agric. Sci. (1931), 21, 376.Google Scholar
(4)Kalamkar, R. J.J. agric. Sci. (1932), 22, 783.Google Scholar
(5)Wishart, J. and Clapham, A. R.J. agric. Sci. (1929), 19, 600.Google Scholar
(6)Yates, F.Ann. Eugen. (1935), 6, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar