Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:42:18.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of stage of maturity, nitrogen application and swath thickness on the field drying of herbage to the hay stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman  and
I. G. Owen
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
I. G. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Herbage from a grass-white clover sward was dried in the field to the hay stage (< 0·3 g moisture/g dry matter) at four times of year in 2 years comparing, in each case, all combinations of three stages of maturity, three levels of applied nitrogen and three thicknesses of swath; 35, 55 and 75 days' regrowth, 0, 75 and 150 kg N/ha and, on average, 220, 474 and 728 g herbage dry matter/m2 were compared.

The least mature herbage had the highest moisture content at the time of cutting and dried most quickly at a given swath thickness, being slightly drier than the more mature herbage at the hay stage. At the cuts in late May-early June and late Juneearly July, when the crop was predominantly grass, the application of nitrogen increased both the moisture content at the time of cutting and the initial rate of drying at a given swatli thickness, so that in the middle and later stages of drying there was no effect of applied N on moisture content. At the cuts in early and late August, herbage from the plots that had received no applied N, which contained a substantial amount of white clover, had the highest moisture content at the time of cutting, dried fastest at a given swath thickness and had the lowest moisture content in the later stages of drying. In the very early stages of drying, herbage in a thin swath lost water much faster than herbage in a thick swath, but subsequently the rate of drying was consistently faster in a thick than in a thin swath so that, by the hay stage, herbage in a tick swath was at least as dry as herbage in a thin swath. There was almost no interaction between the different types, of treatment.

Rain during the drying period had little or no effect on the nitrogen content of the crop, but reduced digestibility by about 9 units. Stage of maturity and swath thickness did not affect the extent of this reduction in digestibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 577 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dexter, S. T. (1947). The moisture content of various hays in equilibrium with atmospheres at various relative humidities. Journal of the Avierican Society of Agronomy 39, 697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faithfull, N. T. (1971). Automated simultaneous determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium on the same herbage digest solution. Laboratory Practice 20, 41–44.Google Scholar
Firth, D. R. & Leshem, Y. (1976). Water loss from cut herbage in the windrow and from isolated leaves and stems. Agricultural Meteorology 17, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. (1979). The effect of stage of growth on the rate of drying of cut grass at 20 °C. Grass and Forage Science 34, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minderhoud, J. W., Van Burg, P. F. J., Deinum, B., Dirven, J. G. P. & T'hart, M. L. (1974). Effects of high levels of nitrogen fertilization and adequate utilization on grassland productivity and cattle performance, with special reference to permanent pastures in the temperate regions. Proceedings of the XIIth International Grassland Congress, Moscow, Vol. I, pp. 99–121.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1979). Fertiliser Recommendations, 2nd edn, GF1. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Owen, I. G. (1981). Studies relating to the field drying of herbage. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of North Cardiganshire. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Shepperson, G. (1961). Effect of time of cutting and method of making on the feed value of hay. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Grassland Congress, Heading 1960, pp. 704–708.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh Plant Breeding Station (1981). Report of Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1980, p. 215.Google Scholar
Wilman, D. & Mohamed, A. A. (1980). Response to nitrogen application and interval between harvests in five grasses. 1. Dry-matter yield, nitrogen content and yield, numbers and weights of tillers, and proportion of crop fractions. Fertilizer Research 1, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar