Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:14:32.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of single compared with split applications of fertilizer nitrogen on the yield and seasonal production of a pure grass sward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. E. Castle  and
D. Reid
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
D. Reid
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a 2-year experiment conducted on a pure S. 24 perennial ryegrass sward, fertilizer nitrogen in the form of ‘Nitram’ (34·5%) N was applied at rates of 100, 200 and 300 lb/ acre either as single dressings in the spring or as two, three, four or five split dressings at successively later dates in the growing season. Total yields of herbage dry matter and of crude protein, and their distribution over the season, were determined by cutting the herbage five times at intervals of approximately 5 weeks. Yields of herbage dry matter were increased by increasing the nitrogen application rate and by splitting the total amount of fertilizer nitrogen into either three or four equal dressings. The mean crudeprotein content of the herbage dry matter was increased by increasing the nitrogen application rate, but it was reduced by splitting the total amount of fertilizer into several dressings. The nitrate content of the herbage was higher after a single heavy dressing of fertilizer nitrogen than after several split dressings. It is concluded that the optimum application programme for a total rate of 100 lb nitrogen/acre was three split dressings each of 33J lb/acre, and for the 200 and 300 lb nitrogen/acre rate, four split dressings of 50 and 75 lb/acre respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 1968 , pp. 383 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brockman, J. S. (1966). The growth rate of grass as influenced by fertilizer nitrogen and stage of defoliation. Proc. 10th Int. Qrassld Congr. Helsinki, pp. 234–40.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Reid, D. & Heddle, R. G. (1965). The effect of varying the date of application of fertilizer nitrogen on the yield and seasonal productivity of grassland. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. (1949). The intensive production of herbage for crop-drying. II. A study of the effect of massive dressings of nitrogenous fertilizer and of the time of their application on the yield, chemical and botanical composition of two grass leys. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39, 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltoffen, H., Kreil, W., Kasdorff, & Leistner, J. (1966). The effect of heavy doses of nitrogen applied to pasture in spring compared with split applications given during the vegetative period. Proc. 10th Int. Qrassld Congr. Helsinki, pp. 231–4.Google Scholar
Reid, D. & Castle, M. E. (1965). The response of grass-clover and pure-grass leys to irrigation and fertilizer nitrogen treatment. I. Irrigation effects. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W., Adams, A. F. R. & Orchiston, H. D. (1953). The use of fertilizers on herbage cut for conservation. IV. The effects of rates, methods of application and forms of fertilizer nitrogen on the yields of dry matter and nitrogen of grasses and clovers in a ryegrass and white clover sward, cut at different stages of growth. J. Br. Qrassld Soc. 8, 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W., Edwards, G. H. A., Cavell, A. J. & Rose, T. H. (1953). The use of fertilizers on herbage cut for conservation. III. Effect of fertilizers and time of application on the yield, chemical and botanical composition of herbage cut for drying. J. Br. Qrassld Soc. 8, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar