Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:28:57.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development: 2. Tissue weight distribution and fat partition between depots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Kempster  and
D. G. Evans
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK2 2EF
D. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK2 2EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dissection data for 1006 carcasses taken from the first 2 years of the Meat and Livestock Commission's (MLC) Commercial Pig Evaluation (CPE) were used to examine the growth of tissue weights in joints relative to the corresponding total tissue weight in carcass, and the growth of fat depots relative to total fat over the carcass weight range, 46–92 kg. Growth relationships were examined using a linear allometric model. Differences in tissue weight distribution between genotypes (pigs from different companies in CPE), sexes (barrows and gilts) and feeding regimens (restricted and ad libitum feeding) were examined at constant lean, bone or fat weight as appropriate, common allometric regression slopes being assumed.

Lean and bone showed the same pattern of development. Relative growth was lowest in the proximal limb joints (ham and hand) increasing inwards to the joints of the back. With minor differences, the same pattern was found for subcutaneous fat and intermuscular fat. Fat depots differed considerably in their growth relative to total fat: intermuscular fat grew more slowly (allometric growth coefficient, b = 0·87), subcutaneous fat at the same rate and perinephric and retroperitoneal fat (flare fat) more rapidly (b = 1·24).

Significant differences were recorded between genotypes in lean distribution and in the distribution of fat depots. However, the differences were small and of little commercial importance. There were also differences in fat partition between genotypes, flare fat being the most variable depot.

Sex and feeding regimen also influenced tissue distribution and fat partition.

The results are discussed in relation to the robustness of regression equations for predicting overall carcass composition from subcutaneous fat measurements and sample joint dissections.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 349 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. & Libortussen, T. (1978). Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27, 51–61.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1965). Practical implications of anatomical research in beef cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 25, 152–163.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J. P. (1977). Selection for economy of production and carcass lean content in Large White pigs and its influence on meat quality characteristics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S. (1974). A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight. 2. Growth changes in muscle distribution. Animal Production 19, 377–387.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S. & Pryor, W. J. (1977). Growth changes in the distribution of dissectable and intramuscular fat in pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doornenbal, H. (1967). Value of subcutaneous fat and back fat measurements on the live animal and the carcass as predictors of external, internal and total carcass fat in market weight pigs. Journal of Animal Science 26, 1288–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duniec, H.Kielanowski, J. & Osinska, Z. (1961). Heritability of chemical fat content in the loin muscle of baconers. Animal Production 3, 195–198.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G. & Kempster, A. J. (1979a). A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 2. Predictors for use in population studies and experiments. Animal Production 28, 97–108.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G. & Kempster, A. J. (1979b). The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development. 1. Primary components, tissues and joints. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, V. R. & Livingstone, R. M. (1972). Modern concepts of growth in pigs. In Pig Production, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, 1971, pp. 143–161. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D. & Smith, R. J. (1976a). Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 2. Distribution between joints. Animal Production 23, 223–232.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Smith, R. J. (1976b). Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. & Evans, D. G. (1979). A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 1. Predictors for use in commercial classification and grading. Animal Production 28, 87–96.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). Growth and development in the pig with special reference to carcass quality characters. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 30, 276–343, 387–436, 511–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pálsson, H. & Vergés, J. B. (1952). Effects of the plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. 1. The effect of high and low planes of nutrition at different ages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 1–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, O. K. (1975). The basis for comparison of carcass quality and grading in pigs. Festskrift til Hjalmar Clausen, pp. 291–305. Det. Kgl. Danske Landhusholdningsselskab.Google Scholar
Richmond, R. J. & Berg, R. T. (1971a). Muscle growth and distribution in swine as influenced by liveweight, breed, sex and ration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, R. J. & Berg, R. T. (1971b). Fat distribution in swine as influenced by liveweight, breed, sex and ration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar