Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:34:58.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of type of suckling on the pre- and post-weaning lactation performance of Damascus goats and the growth rate of the kids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Hadjipanayiotou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus

Summary

Forty-nine and 58 Damascus goats were used in each of two trials, respectively. Goats were randomly allocated 2 days post-partum to twin-suckling (TS), singlesuckling (SS) and no-suckling (NS) kids treatments. In trial 1, artificially reared kids were divided into two groups fed either on ewe-milk (25·8% fat, 24·2% protein) or on calf-milk (15% fat, 22·5% protein) replacer. In trial 2, all artificially reared kids were fed on ewe-milk replacer. The ewe- and calf-milk replacers were reconstituted in the ratio of 1 part powder to 5 or 4 parts (by weight) of water, respectively.

Separation of kids from their dams reduced total milk yield (means of two trials) until weaning (TS 194, SS 176, NS 121 kg/goat) and from weaning to 90 days of lactation (TS 95, SS 89, NS 70 kg/goat). On the other hand, separation of kids increased marketable milk yield until weaning (TS 68, SS 99, NS 121 kg/goat). Marketable milk during the period 3–90 days post-partum was similar for NS and SS goats (TS 163, SS 188, NS 191 kg/goat). Goats suckling two kids suffered greater weight losses (TS 78, SS 44, NS 6 g/day). Goats suckling two males produced more milk until weaning than all other twin sets. Differences in concentrate intake between group means of TS and SS were smaller compared with the NS group (TS 2·26, SS 2·08, NS 1·86 kg/goat per day).

There were no differences in weaning weight and weight gain from birth to weaning between kids reared on milk replacers. However, four kids on the calf-milk replacer died and two more were excluded from the data because of severe scouring. Single suckling kids gained more weight until weaning than TS and those reared artificially (AR) on ewe-milk replacer (SS 11·1, TS 9·1, AR 9·3 kg/kid). Furthermore, males consumed more milk than females (males 74, females 64 kg/kid) and SS more than TS kids (SS 75, TS 63 kg/kid).

It is concluded that SS and NS treatments increase commercial milk yields compared with the TS goats, but NS should not be recommended because of an adverse effect on pre- and post-weaning lactation performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleman, R. D. & Owens, F. G. (1974). Symposium: Recent advances in calf rearing. III. Breeding, housing and feeding management. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 447464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. M. M., Edwards, R. A. & Simpson, M. E. (1961). Rearing lambs on a synthetio diet. Animal Production 3, 105109.Google Scholar
Folman, Y., Eyal, E. & Volcani, R. (1966). Mother-offspring relationships in Awassi sheep. II. Milk yields and weight gains of lambs in a mutton flock. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 369370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, K. R., Jordan, R. M. & Terrill, C. E. (1981). Rearing lambs on milk replacer diets. U.S.D.A. Farmers Bulletin 2270, p. 21.Google Scholar
Geenty, K. G. (1979). Lactation performance, growth and carcass composition of sheep. 1. Milk production, milk composition and live weights of Romney, Corriedale, Dorset, Romney × Dorset and Dorset × Romney ewes in relation to the growth of their lambs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 241250.Google Scholar
Geenty, K. G. (1980). Dairy and suckled milk production of Dorset ewes. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 8, 191197.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. (1984). Weaning systems: intensive fattening of Chios lambs and Damascus kids in Cyprus. World Animal Review 52, 3439.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. & Economides, S. (1986), The effect of rearing type on the pre- and post-weaning lactation performance of Chios sheep and the growth rate of the lambs. Technical Bulletin 78, p. 8. Nicosia: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. & Louca, A. (1976). The effects of partial suckling on the lactation performance of Chios sheep and Damascus goats and the growth rate of the lambs and kids. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 1520.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M., Papachristoforou, C. & Dekker, G. M. (1985). The effects of rearing systems on the performance of male Chios lambs. Technical Bulletin 67, p. 5. Nicosia: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1975). Least Squares Analysis of Data with Unequal Subclass Numbers. USDA ARS H-4. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Loerch, S. C., McClure, K. E. & Parker, C. F. (1985). Effects of number of lambs suckled and supplemental protein source on lactating ewe performance. Journal of Animal Science 60, 613.Google Scholar
Louca, A. (1972). The effect of suckling regime on growth rate and lactation performance of the Cyprus Fat-tailed and Chios sheep. Animal Production 15, 5359.Google Scholar
Louca, A., Mavrogenis, A. & Lawlor, M. J. (1975). The effect of early weaning on the lactation performance of Damascus goats and the growth rate of the kids. Animal Production 20, 213218.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. J., Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Sibbald, A. R. & MacDonald, D. (1979). The effect of rearing type and prepartum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyfaoe ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 165174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morag, M., Raz, A. & Eyal, E. (1970). Mother-offspring relationships in Awassi sheep. IV. The effect of weaning at birth, or after 15 weeks, on lactational performance in the dairy ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 183187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P., Hervieux, J., Bas, P. & Sauvant, D. (1982) Feeding of young goats. In Proceedings, III. International Conference on Ooat Production and Diseases, Tucson, Arizona, p. 90.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. H. & Van Vleck, L. D. (1974). Principles of Dairy Science. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Skjevdal, T. (1974). Milk Feeding of Kids. Report 173, Vol. 53, NR 39, Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1977). The effects on milk production of the number of lambs suckled and age, parity and size of ewe. In European Association of Animal Production, Publication No. 23.Google Scholar