Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:12:19.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of herbage allowance during pregnancy and lactation on feed intake, milk production, body composition and energy utilization of ewes at pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. G. Geenty
Affiliation:
Templeton Agricultural Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, P.O. Box 23–033, Templeton, New Zealand
A. R. Sykes
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Lincoln College, University of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand

Summary

In two experiments Dorset ewes were offered low (LP) or high (HP) herbage allowances during pregnancy to induce light (45–50 kg) or heavy (60–65 kg) post-partum body weights, respectively. During the first 6 weeks of lactation three herbage allowances were offered in a 2 x 3 factorial design: 2 (LL), 5 (ML) and 8 (HL) kg D.M./ewe per day. In the first experiment (Expt 1) lambs were removed and ewes machine-milked twice daily. In the second (Expt 2) they were suckled by two lambs; a further group on the ML allowance (MML) was machine-milked. Ewes were slaughtered during early pregnancy, post-partum and after 6 weeks of lactation for determination of body composition. Diet selection and faecal output were measured during lactation.

Absolute level of milk production was not affected by pregnancy nutrition when rearing two lambs and producing 2·0–2–7 kg milk/day or at 30–50% lower milk production when machine-milked. When expressed as g/kg W0·75 per day milk production was 14% greater in LP than in HP ewes. Milk fat content was higher at low allowances and was positively related to rate of body fat mobilization. Milk protein concentration was lower in suckled than in machine-milked ewes (40 ν. 47 g/kg) though total milk protein secreted (g/day) was similar. Milk production was 11–13% greater in ewes bearing twin lambs compared with those bearing singles whether machine-milked or suckling two lambs.

Mean intakes during the 6 weeks of lactation were 58, 69 and 73 g DOM/kg W0·75 per day, respectively, for LL, ML and HL groups when machine-milked and 51, 75 and 83 g DOM/kg W0·75/day, respectively, for ewes rearing two lambs. LP ewes consumed 13% (Expt 1) and 17% (Expt 2) more feed (g DOM/kg W0·75/day) during lactation than HP ewes, though in absolute terms (kg D.M./day) there was no difference. The difference in OMD between herbage offered (OMD = 0·77) and consumed ranged from 0 when sheep grazed to a residual herbage mass of 910 kg D.M./ha to + 0·04 when residual herbage was < 1600 kg D.M./ha.

All sheep, irrespective of pregnancy nutrition, milk production or herbage allowance, were in negative body energy balance during lactation. Mobilization of body fat during lactation averaged 40 g/day for machine-milked and 150 g/day for suckled ewes and was greatest in HPLL groups (92 and 219 g/day in Expts 1 and 2, respectively). In LP groups body protein loss during pregnancy was 10 and 16 g/day in Expts 1 and 2, respectively, and little further net protein loss occurred during lactation. The maximum rate of body protein loss in HP groups was 30 g/day in ewes rearing two lambs on the low herbage allowance.

Maintenance energy requirement during lactation averaged 0·238 MJ ME/kg W per day for ewes in both experiments; efficiency of use (Kl, (t)) of total energy available above maintenance for milk synthesis (namely, milk energy/ME intake - estimated energy requirement for maintenance (MEm + mobilized tissue energy) decreased from 0·84 to 0·51 with increasing rate of tissue energy mobilization. There was a positive relationship between Kl(t) and the proportion of mobilized energy derived from body protein.

The overall energy requirement of lactating ewes well-fed during pregnancy was similar to previous estimates (Agricultural Research Council, 1980) but that of sheep undernourished during pregnancy was 10–20% greater.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1968). The amount and physical form of feed and milk secretion in the cow. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 27, 5765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association or Official Analytical Chemists (1960). Methods of Analysis. 10th edn.Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Bails, C. A. & Forbes, J. M. (1974). Control of feed intake and energy balance in ruminants. Physiological Reviews 54, 160214.Google Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 39, 4455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1980). Responses to abomasal infusions of casein plus methionine in lactating ewes fed fresh pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 427431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A., Suzuki, S. & Balch, C. C. (1969). The quantitative significance of long-term regulation of food intake in the cow. British Journal of Nutrition 23, 695704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, D. J., Corbett, J. L. & Inskip, M. W. (1972). Estimation of the energy value of ewes milk. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 286291.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. & Drew, K. R. (1963). Maintenance and lactation requirements of grazing sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 23, 5262.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & McHattie, I. (1979). Body composition changes in lactating ewes estimated by serial slaughter and deuterium dilution. Animal Production 29, 8190.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I. & Smart, R. (1980). Effects of body fatness at lambing and diet in lactation on body tissue loss, feed intake and milk yield of ewes in early lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 497514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. & Pennie, K. (1981). Effects of protein concentration in the diet on milk yield, change in body composition and the energy utilization of body tissue for milk production in ewes. Animal Production 33, 111120.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. & Russel, A. J. F. (1979). The relationship in ewes between voluntary food intake during pregnancy and forage intake during lactation and after weaning. Animal Production 28, 2539.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1969). The effect of pregnancy and fatness on the volume of rumen contents in the ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 119121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1970). The voluntary feed intake of pregnant and lactating ruminants: a review. The British Veterinary Journal 126, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Hogue, D. E. (1964). Effects of energy intake and number of lambs suckled on milk yield, milk composition and energetic efficiency of lactating ewes. Journal of Animal Science 23, 935942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenty, K. G. (1979). Lactation performance, growth and carcass composition of sheep. I. Milk production, milk composition, and live weights of Ronxnoy, Corriedale, Dorset, Romney x Dorset, and Dorset x Romney ewes in relation to the growth of their lambs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 241250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenty, K. G. (1980). Dairy and suckled milk production of Dorset ewes. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 8, 191197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenty, K. G. & Davison, P. G. (1982). Influence of weaning age, milking frequency and udder stimulation on dairy milk production and post-partum oestrus interval of Dorset ewes. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 10, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1978). The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of ewes and their twin lambs grazing perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 139147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Treacher, T. T. & Shanmugalingam, V. S. (1981). Herbage intake and performance of grazing ewes and their lambs when weaned at 6, 8, 10 or 14 weeks of age. Animal Production 33, 223232.Google Scholar
Gingins, M., Bickel, H. & Schubch, A. (1980). Efficiency of energy utilization in undernourished and realimented sheep. Livestock Production Science 7, 465471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjipieris, G. & Holmes, W. (1966). Studies on feed intake and feed utilization by sheep. I. The voluntary feed intake of dry, pregnant and lactating ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1977). Factors limiting herbage intake by the grazing animal. In Proceedings of the International Meeting on Animal Production from Temperate Grasslands, Dublin, pp. 7075.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1980). Some implications of sward chemical and physical characteristics for the nutrition of grazing ruminants. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 40, 6884.Google Scholar
International Wool Textile Organisation (1976). Determination of wool base, vegetable matter base, ‘Iwto clean wool content’ and ‘Iwto scoured yield’ in raw wool. International Wool Textile Organuation-19–16(E).Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. & Reardon, T. F. (1963). The use of chromium oxide to estimate the faecal output of Merinos. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 239256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1975). Techniques for estimating nutrient intake and its utilization by the grazing ruminant. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 320332. University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1977). The intake and production of lactating Merino ewes and their lambs grazed at different stocking rates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Bennett, I. L. (1973). Stocking intensity and pastoral production. III. Wool production, fleece characteristics, and the utilization of nutrients for maintenance and wool growth by Merino sheep grazed at different stocking rates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Reid, G. W. (1963). Estimation of the faeces output of grazing animals from the concentration of chromium sesquioxide in a sample of faeces. I. Comparison of estimates from samples taken at fixed times of day with faeces outputs measured directly. British Journal of Nutrition 17, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, L. W. (1954). Sampling of fleeces for yield, staple length, and crimps per inch measurement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 555567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, W. R., Arnold, G. W. & Hamilton, F. J. (1962). Improved techniques in oesophageal fistulation of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 38, 275281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, T. J., Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Sibbald, A. R. & McDonald, D. (1979). The effect of rearing type and pre-partum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyface ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 165174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. W., Tyrrell, H. F. & Flatt, W. P. (1971). Energetics of body tissue mobilisation. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 548553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. A. (1982). Theory of Feeding and Growth of Animals. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1967). The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1970). The influence of live weight and body condition on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes following a period of undernourishment in early lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 303313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Edwards, R. A. & Donaldson, E. (1972). The yield and composition of the milk of Finnish Landrace x Blackface ewes. I. Ewes and lambs maintained indoors. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 303313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Edwards, R. A. & Donaldson, E. (1975). The yield and composition of the milk of Finnish Landrace x Blackface ewes. II. Ewes and lambs grazed on pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 315324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V. & Jagusch, K. T. (1978). Pasture allowances for the breeding ewe. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 38, 121126.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., McHattie, I. & Pennie, K. (1978). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 4. Sequential changes in the maternal body during pregnancy. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 391–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I., Calderon Cortes, J. F. & Thompson, J. L. (1979). Further studies on the response of lactating ewes to dietary protein. Animal Production 29, 257269.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. L. & McLeay, L. M. (1977). Response of lactating cows to abomasal infusions of casein, methionine and glucose. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37, 4649.Google Scholar
Rowell, J. G. & Walters, D. E. (1976). Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 423443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, J. A., Wilke, P. I. & Compann, J. P. (1971). Surgical procedure for the creation of an oesophageal fistula in sheep. Agroanimalia 3, 99102.Google Scholar
Stern, D., Alder, J. H., Tagari, H. & Eyal, E. (1978). Responses of dairy ewes before and after parturition to different nutritional regimes during pregnancy. II. Energy intake, body weight changes during lactation and milk production. Annales de Zootechnie 27, 335346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. R. (1974). The prediction of the body composition of hill sheep from body weight, red cell volume and tritiated water space. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. R., Coop, R. L. & Angus, K. W. (1979). Chronic infection with Trichostrongylus vitrinus in sheep. Some effects on food utilization, skeletal growth and certain serum constituents. Research in Veterinary Science 26, 372377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, A. R. & Field, A. C. (1972). Effects of dietary deficiencies of energy, protein and calcium on the pregnant ewe. 1. Body composition and mineral content of the ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1970). Effects of nutrition in late pregnancy on subsequent milk production in ewes. Animal Production 12, 2336.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1971). Effects of nutrition in pregnancy and in lactation on milk yield in ewes. Animal Production 13, 493501.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Barclay, P. C., Lancashire, J. A. & Armstrong, C. S. M. (1974). The feeding value to sheep of Grasslands Tama, Westerwolds ryegrass, Grasslands Paroa, Italian ryegrass and Grasslands Ruanui perennial ryegrass under rotational grazing management. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2, 231236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & Barton, R. A. (1964). Effect of body composition and weight of ingesta on the number of lambs reared by Romney Marsh ewes. Nature, London 202, 318319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, L. R. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 38, 93153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 381385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar