Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:29:34.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of centre of production, maturity and storage treatment of seed tubers on the growth of early potatoes: I. Sprout development in storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. B. Goodwin ,
A. Brown ,
J. H. Lennard  and
F. L. Milthorpe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of three centres of production, two times of lifting and two post-harvest treatments of apparently virus-free seed tubers on sprout development at planting was studied over two seasons. Sprout length and degree of development were determined mainly by the light and temperature conditions during storage. Under similar storage conditions tubers from the most southern region, lifted early and allowed to sprout from lifting produced longer sprouts than those from the more northerly regions, lifted late and sprouted from midwinter. At planting all tubers had sprouts longer than 2·5 cm. Desprouted tubers from the more southern regions had the highest number of sprouts at planting and tubers 'greened' immediately on lifting had the least.

An index of sprout development at planting was defined. The conditions and duration of storage had most influence on the degree of development as measured by this index; sprouts were most developed on tubers sprouted over a long period and on those sprouted in a heated glasshouse. The effects of varying centres of production and times of lifting on sprout development at planting were small compared with those readily produced by varying the storage conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 1969 , pp. 161 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadbent, L., Brown, P. H. & Wright, R. C. M. (1961). Home production of seed for early potatoes. 2. Comparison of home produced and imported seed. Expl Hort. 5, 37–9.Google Scholar
Burton, W. G. (1957). The dormancy and sprouting of potatoes. Fd Sci. Abstr. 29, 1–12.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. M. W. (1958). Dormancy in the potato tuber and the effects of storage conditions on initial sprouting and subsequent growth. Am. Potato J. 35, 451–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischnich, O. & Krug, H. (1963). Environmental factors influencing sprout growth and subsequent plant development in the field. Proc. 10th Easter School agric. Sci. Univ. Nottm, 72–8.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. (1963). Mechanism and significance of apical dominance in the potato tuber. Proc. 10th Easter School agric. Sci. Univ. Nottm, 63–71.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. (1964). The physiology of sprouting of potato tubers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. (1967a). The control of branch growth on potato tubers. I. Anatomy of buds in relation to dormancy and correlative inhibition, J. exp. Bot. 18, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. (1967b). The control of branch growth on potato tubers. II. The pattern of sprout growth. J. exp. Bot. 18, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. & Cansfield, P. E. (1967). The control of branch growth on potato tubers. III. The basis of correlative inhibition. J. Exp. Bot. 18, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P. B., Milthorpe, F. L., Brown, A. & Lennard, J. H. (1966). Effect of centre of production and maturity of seed tuber on yields of early potatoes. Expl Hort. 14, 31–8.Google Scholar
Headfokd, D. W. R. (1961). Sprout growth of the potato. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Headfokd, D. W. R. (1962). Sprout development and subsequent plant growth. Eur. Potato J. 5, 14–12.Google Scholar
Kawakami, K. (1936) Improving potato seed tubers for spring crops (translated title) Nogyo-Keizai 3, 399–405.Google Scholar
Kawakami, K. (1953). Physiological aspects of potato seed tubers. Mem. Hyogo Univ. Agric. 2, 1–114.Google Scholar
Kawakami, K. (1962). The physiological degeneration of potato seed tubers and its control. Eur. Potato J. 5, 40–9.Google Scholar
Krijthe, N. (1946). De invloed van de bewaring der aardappelknollen op den bouq de knoppen en op de ontwikkeling tot volwassen plant. 1. Meded. Lanb-Hoogesch, Wageningen, 47, 3–36.Google Scholar
Madec, P. & Perennec, P. (1955). Les possibilités d'évolution des germes de la pomme de terre et leurs consequences. Annls Amél. Pl. 5, 555–74.Google Scholar
Madec, P. & Perennec, P. (1956). Influence de l'origine sur le comportement des plantes des pommes de terre. Annls Amél. Pl. 6, 5–26.Google Scholar
Madec, P. & Perennec, P. (1959). Le role respectif du feuillage et du feuillage et du tubercule-mère dans la tuberisation de la pomme de terre. Eur. Potato J. 2, 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, E. (1961). Factors influencing the development of sprouts of the potato. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. L. & Eyre, P. W. (1951). Early Potatoes. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Toosey, R. D. (1963). The influence of sprout development at planting on subsequent growth and yield. Proc. 10th Easter School agric. Sci. Univ. Nottm 79–95.Google Scholar