Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T03:36:28.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of ambient temperature and urea supplementation on the intake and digestion of alkali-treated straw by Brahman cattle and swamp buffaloes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Pearson  and
R. F. Archibald
R. A. Pearson
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
R. F. Archibald
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four adult swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and four adult Brahman cattle (Bos indicus), maintained in climate rooms, were provided ad libitum with a pelleted NaOH-treated barley straw ration (10·7 g N/kg dry matter) supplemented with sulphur, minerals and vitamins and 0, 14·5 or 22 g urea/kg. The animals were given each diet when housed at 32 °C and, in addition, were given the urea unsupplemented diet at 22 °C. All animals received all treatments for periods of 21 days, measurements being made during the last 8 days, after the animals had been given single doses of two nonabsorbable markers (Cr-fibre and Co-EDTA). Intake, digestibility and gastro-intestinal passage rate were low on the unsupplemented N-deficient (10·7 g N/kg dry matter) diet at both temperatures. Urea supplementation to provide diets of 17·3 and 20·7 g N/kg dry matter was associated with increased intake and digestibility of the feed and increased rate of passage of digesta through the gut.

Despite differences in respiration rate and plasma thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations at the two temperatures, no effects of temperature on intakes and digestion of the unsupplemented diet were seen. Differences between species were seen in respiration rate at 32 °C and plasma T4, which were higher, and mean retention time of Cr in the gut at 22 °C and water intakes, which were lower, in Brahman cattle than in buffaloes. There were no significant species differences in response to dietary urea supplementation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Christopherson, R. J. & Kennedy, P. M. (1983). Effect of the thermal environment on digestion in ruminants. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63, 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. (1987). Maximising the rate of fibre digestion in the rumen. In Ruminant Feeding Systems Utilizing Fibrous Agricultural Residues 1986 (Ed. Dixon, R. M.), pp.49–67. Canberra, Australia: IDP.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1986). Principles of supplementation of poor quality roughages with nitrogen. In Ruminant Feeding Systems Utilizing Fibrous Agricultural Residues 1985 (Ed. Dixon, R. M.), pp. 49–57. Canberra, Australia: IDP.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1977). Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Animal Production 25, 343–358.Google Scholar
Graham, M. McC. (1985). Relevance of the British Metabolisable Energy System to the feeding of draught animals. In Draught Animal Power for Production, ACIAR Proceedings Series No.10 (Ed. Copland, J. W.), pp. 96–98. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. A. & Siebert, B. D. (1985 a). Utilization of low-quality roughage by Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. 1. Rumen digestion. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, R. A. & Siebert, B. D. (1985 b). Utilization of low-quality roughage by Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. 2. The effect of rumen-degradable nitrogen and sulphur on voluntary food intake and rumen characteristics. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 649–656.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. A. & Siebert, B. D. (1987). The effect of supplements of rumen-degradable protein and formaldehyde-treated casein on the intake of low-nitrogen roughages by Bos taurus and Bos indicus steers at different stages of maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikhatua, V. J., Olubajo, F. O. & Adeleye, I. O. A. (1985). Dry matter intake, nutrient utilization and liveweight gain comparisons between Bos indicus, Bos taurus and crossbred cattle. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 33, 153–156.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. (1980). The effects of dietary sucrose and the concentrations of plasma urea and rumen ammonia on the degradation of urea in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 125–140.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. (1987). A summary of two experiments comparing nutrition in buffalo and cattle. DAP Project Bulletin 3, 16–17.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C., Baber, R. P. & Archibald, R. F. (1989). Intake, digestion and gastro-intestinal mean retention time in Asiatic buffaloes and Ayrshire cattle given two contrasting diets and housed at 20° and 33 °C. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 211–222.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C., Pearson, R. A., Sneddon, J. C., Matthewman, R. W. & Smith, A. J. (1985). The use of draught cows in agricultural systems with particular reference to their nutritional needs. In Milk Production in Developing Countries (Ed. Smith, A. J.), pp. 476–496. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mbatya, P. B. A., Kay, M. & Smart, R. I. (1983). Methods of improving the utilization of cereal straw by ruminants. 1. Supplements of urea, molasses and dried grass and treatment with sodium hydroxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, J. B., Satoto, K. B. & Dawson, J. E. (1983). The utilization of rice straw fed to Zebu cattle and swamp buffalo as influenced by alkali treatment and Leucaena supplementation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 73–84.Google Scholar
Rexen, F. P. & Bach Knudsen, K. E. (1984). Industrial-scale dry treatment with sodium hydroxide. In Straw and Other Fibrous By-products as Feed (Ed. Sundstøl, F. & Oxen, E.), pp. 127–151. Development in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 14, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Silva, A. T., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Ørskov, E. R. (1989). Influence of ammonia treatment and supplementation on the intake, digestibility and weight gain of sheep and cattle on barley straw diets. Animal Production 48, 99–108.Google Scholar
Singh, K. & Goel, V. K. (1986). Thyroid activity during moderate and hot humid periods in crossbred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 56, 524–526.Google Scholar
Spragg, J. C., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1986). Effect of supplements on intake, rumen function and nutrient supply and growth in cattle eating alkali-treated oat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 487–495.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. E. (1973). Climatic physiology of cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 40, 441–473.Google Scholar
Vercoe, J. E. (1969). The transfer of nitrogen from the blood to the rumen in cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, N. A. C., Pearson, R. A. & Archibald, R. F. (1986). Effect of ambient temperature and urea supplementation on the intake of fibrous diets by draught animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 98 A.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1976). The influence of the climatic environment on metabolism in cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production (Ed. Swan, H. & Broster, W. H.), pp. 103–121. Sevenoaks, Kent: Butterworths.Google Scholar