Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:14:01.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution, transformations and recovery of urinary sulphur and sources of plant-available soil sulphur in irrigated pasture soil–plant systems treated with 35sulphur-labelled urine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. L. Nguyen  and
K. M. Goh
M. L. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
K. M. Goh
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A field plot experiment of 271 days duration was conducted on New Zealand irrigated pastures, commencing in the summer (January) 1988, on a Templeton silt loam soil (Udic Ustochrept) by applying 35sulphur (35S)-labelled urine (250 μCi/g S with 1300 μg S/ml) to field plots (600 × 600 mm) at a rate equivalent to that normally occurring in sheep urine patches (150 ml/0·03 m2) to investigate the distribution, transformations and recovery of urinary S in pasture soil–plant systems and sources of plant-available soil S as influenced by the available soil moisture at the time of urine application and varying amounts of applied irrigation water. Results obtained showed that c. 55–90% of 35S-labelled urine was incorporated into soil sulphate (SO42−), ester SO42− and carbon (C)-bonded S fractions within the major plant rooting zone (0–300 mm), as early as 27 days after urine application. Hydriodic acid (Hl)-reducible and C-bonded soil S fractions showed no consistent trend of incorporation. On day 271, labelled-S was found in soil SO42−, Hl-reducible S and C-bonded S fractions to a soil depth of 500 mm, indicating that not only SO42− but also organic S fractions from soils and 35S-labelled urine were leached beyond the major rooting zone. A large proportion (c. 59–75%) of 35S-labelled urine was not recovered in pasture soil–plant systems over a 271-day period, presumably due to leaching losses beyond the 0–300 mm soil depth. This estimated leaching loss was comparable to that (75%) predicted using the S model developed by the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture. The recovery of urinary S in soil–plant systems over a 271-day period was not affected by different amounts of irrigation water applied 7 days after urine application to soil at either 50 or 75% available water holding capacity (AWHC). However, significantly lower S recovery occurred when urinary S was applied to the soil at 25% AWHC than at field capacity, suggesting that urinary S applied at field capacity might not have sufficient time to be adsorbed by soil particles, enter soil micropores or be immobilized by soil micro-organisms. Both soil ester SO42− and calcium phosphate-extractable soil S in urine-treated soils were found to be major S sources for pasture S uptake. Labelled S from 35S-labelled urine accounted for c. 12–47% of total S in pasture herbage.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 91 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, F. E. & Richards, J. A. (1962). A note on the use of the power-driven sheep-shearing head for measuring herbage yields. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17, 101–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, N. J. (1987). Return of nutrients by animals. In Managed Grasslands: Analytical Studies. Ecosystems of the World 17B (Ed. Snaydon, R. W.), pp. 181–186. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. M. & Webb, T. H. (1985). Soils of Templeton Farm. Soil Bureau District Office Report CH 15. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
Boswell, C. C. (1983). An assessment of phosphorus and sulphur interactions on aspects of the sulphur cycle in pasture. PhD thesis, University of New England.Google Scholar
Curtin, D. & Syers, J. K. (1990). Extractability and adsorption of sulphate in soils. Journal of Soil Science 41, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faires, R. A. & Boswell, G. G. J. (1981). Radioisotope Laboratory Techniques (4th edn). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. W., Ash, J. T., Strickland, T. C. & Swank, W. T. (1983). Formation of organic sulfur in forest soils: a biologically mediated process. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 1077–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freney, J. R., Melville, G. E. & Williams, C. H. (1969). Extraction, chemical nature and properties of soil organic sulphur. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20, 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freney, J. R. (1986). Forms and reactions of organic sulfur compounds in soils. In Sulfur in Agriculture (Ed. Tabatabai, M. A.), pp. 207–232. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy. Agronomy Monograph Number 27.Google Scholar
Ghani, A., McLaren, R. G. & Swift, R. S. (1991). Sulphur mineralisation in some New Zealand soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 11, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghani, A., McLaren, R. G. & Swift, R. S. (1992). Sulphur mineralisation and transformations in soils as influenced by additions of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, K. M. & Gregg, P. E. H. (1982). Field studies on the fate of radioactive sulphur fertilizer applied to pastures. Fertilizer Research 3, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, K. M. & Nguyen, M. L. (1990). Effects of grazing animals on the plant availability of sulphur fertilisers in grazed pastures. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 52, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, P. E. H. & Goh, K. M. (1982). Field studies with radioactive sulphur-labelled gypsum fertiliser. IV. Recovery by pasture and soil components. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, J. M. & Stocker, R. V. (1982). Soil water extraction patterns under pasture and lucerne on two soil types in mid-Canterbury. In Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 12, 61–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. P. & Till, A. R. (1981). The distribution in soil and plant of 35S from sheep excreta. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuning, J. A. (1980). Urine scorch in grassland. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production: Proceedings of the International Symposium of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Prins, W. H. & Arnold, G. H.), pp. 163. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Ledgard, S. F., Steele, K. W. & Saunders, W. M. H. (1982). Effects of cow urine and its major constituents on pasture properties. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 61–68.Google Scholar
McLay, C. D. A. (1989). Sulphate leaching under field conditions. PhD thesis, Lincoln College, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
McLay, C. D. A., Cameron, K. C. & McLaren, R. G. (1991). Effect of time of application and continuity of rainfall on leaching of surface-applied nutrients. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLay, C. D. A., Cameron, K. C. & McLaren, R. G. (1992). Influence of soil structure on sulfate leaching from a silt loam. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. (1990). Sulphur cycling in soil–plant–animal systems under grazed, irrigated pastures in Canterbury, New Zealand and its implication on pasture sulphur requirements. PhD thesis, Lincoln University.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. & Goh, K. M. (1991). Applicability of the MAF soil sulphate ‘Quick test’ and the MAF sulphur model in predicting short-term sulphur requirements of grazed pastures in Canterbury. In Proceedings of Soil and Plant Testing for Nutrient Deficiencies and Toxicities, 21–22 February 1991 (Eds White, R. E. & Currie, L. D.), pp. 280–293. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Occasional Report No. 5. Massey University.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. & Goh, K. M. (1992 a). Nutrient cycling and losses based on a mass-balance model in grazed pastures receiving long-term superphosphate applications in New Zealand. 2. Sulphur. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. & Goh, K. M. (1992 b). Evaluation of methods for determining sulphur-35 and sulphur-32 in the same trapping solution of Johnson and Nishita method. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23, 1893–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, G. H. B. & Taylor, R. J. (1972). On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100, 81–92.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quin, B. F. (1977). The fate of sheep urine-nitrogen on surface-irrigated pasture in Canterbury. In Proceedings of Workshop on Nitrogen Transformations in the Soil-Pasture System (Ed. Saunders, W. M. H.), pp. 140–143. New Zealand Soil News Supplement 25, No. 4.Google Scholar
Risk, W. W. & Boswell, C. C. (1988). Sulphate sulphur in the subsoil of Southland and Otago soils. In Proceedings of the Workshop Towards the More Efficient Use of Fertilizer Sulphur, Massev University, Palmerston North, 17–18 February 1988 (Eds White, R. E. & Currie, L. D.), pp. 118–128. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Occasional Report No. 2, Massey University.Google Scholar
Sakadevan, K. (1991). Factors influencing the transformation and fate of sulphur and nitrogen in grazed hill country pasture. PhD thesis, Massey University.Google Scholar
Schechtner, G., Tunney, H., Arnold, G. H. & Keuning, J. A. (1980). Positive and negative effects of cattle manure on grassland with special reference to high rates of application. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production: Proceedings of the International Symposium of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Prins, W. H. & Arnold, G. H.), pp. 77–93. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Schoenau, J. J. & Bettany, J. R. (1987). Organic matter leaching as a component of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur cycles in a forest, grassland, and gleyed soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. (1983). Problems in modelling sulphur requirements in New Zealand pastures. In Proceedings of the Technical Workshop on Sulphur in New Zealand Agriculture, Massey University, Palmerston North, 23–24 May 1983 (Eds Gregg, P. E. H. & Syers, J. K.), pp. 106–117. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Soil Science. Occasional Report No. 4, Massey University.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. & Saunders, W. M. H. (1984). Pasture maintenance, sulphur. In Fertiliser Recommendations for Pastures and Crops in New Zealand (2nd revised edn) (Eds Cornforth, I. S. & Sinclair, A. G.), pp. 15–17. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. G., Boswell, C. C., Cornforth, I. S., Lee, A., Morgan, C., Morton, J., Nguyen, L., Saunders, W. M. H., Shannon, P., Smith, R. G. & Whelan, G. (1985). Agronomic requirements for sulphur in New Zealand pastures. Proceedings of the 20th Technical Conference of the New Zealand Fertiliser Manufacturers' Research Association 2, 538–572.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Steinbergs, A., Iismaa, O., Freney, J. R. & Barrow, N. J. (1962). Determination of total sulphur in soil and plant material. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, T. C., Fitzgerald, J. W., Ash, J. T. & Swank, W. T. (1987). Organic sulfur transformations and sulfur pool sizes in soil and litter from a southern Appalachian hardwood forest. Soil Science 143, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. C., Lockyer, D. R. & Raistrick, N. (1989). Volatilization of ammonia from urea applied to soil: Influence of hippuric acid and other constituents of livestock urine. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21, 803–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, A. (1981). Mass flow and diffusion. In The Chemistry of Soil Processes (Eds Greenland, D. J. & Hayes, M. H. B.), pp. 37–80. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar