Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T13:55:55.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet attributes of lactating ewes at pasture using faecal NIRS and relationship to pasture characteristics and milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2010

M. BOVAL ,
E. ORTEGA-JIMENEZ ,
A. FANCHONE  and
G. ALEXANDRE
M. BOVAL*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.)
E. ORTEGA-JIMENEZ
Affiliation:
Colegio de Post-Graduados, Estación Experimental de Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico
A. FANCHONE
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.)
G. ALEXANDRE
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.)
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: maryline.boval@antilles.inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In order to assess the diet of lactating ewes fed at pasture and the relationship of diet quality to pasture characteristics and milk production (MP), 12 lactating ewes were monitored during five lactation cycles (LCs). Individual faecal samples were collected three times per LC and scanned using a Foss NIRSystem 6500 monochromator. The organic matter digestibility (OMD), organic matter intake (OMI), digestible OMI (DOMI) and the chemical composition of the herbage ingested, i.e. the crude protein (CP) content of the herbage ingested (CPi) and the acid detergent fibre and lignin contents of the herbage ingested (ADFi and ADLi), were determined. The MP of the ewes and the pasture characteristics were measured and their relationships with diet quality were analysed.

OMI and DOMI were higher during the first and the fourth LC (P<0·01). OMD and CPi were higher during the second and the fifth LC (P<0·01). MP varied with OMI (P<0·01) and with DOMI (MP=0·1362×DOMI0·53, R2=0·40, P<0·001), whereas it was negatively correlated with OMD (r=−0·46, P<0·001). OMD and CPi were both positively correlated with the CP content of the pasture (r=0·25, P<0·03; r=0·50, P<0·001), whereas the ADFi was negatively correlated with CP content (r=−0·48, P<0·01). The variation in OMI, DOMI and MP, on the one hand, and OMD and CPi, on the other, throughout the different LCs illustrates the importance of measuring several parameters when evaluating diets at pasture.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 148 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 477 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn.Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Avondo, M., Bordonaro, S., Marletta, D., Guastella, A. M. & D'Urso, G. (2000). Effects of shearing and supplemental level on intake of dry ewes grazing on barley stubble. Small Ruminant Research 38, 237–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumont, R., Prache, S., Meuret, M. & Morand-Fehr, P. (2000). How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 64, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocquier, F. & Caja, G. (2001). Effects of nutrition on ewes' milk quality. Productions Animales 14, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M., Fanchone, A., Archimede, H. & Gibb, M. J. (2007). Effect of structure of a tropical pasture on ingestive behaviour, digestibility of diet and daily intake by grazing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 62, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. C. & Sollenberger, L. E. (2002). Grazing behavior of ruminants and daily performance from warm-season grasses. Crop Science 42, 873–881.Google Scholar
Cabiddu, A., Decandia, M., Addis, M., Piredda, G., Pirisi, A. & Molle, G. (2005). Managing Mediterranean pastures in order to enhance the level of beneficial fatty acids in sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 59, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P., Gibb, M. & Tamminga, S. (2005). Pasture characteristics and animal performance. In Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism (Eds Dijkstra, J., Forbes, J. M. & France, J.), pp. 681–706. Wallingford, UK: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, D. B. (1999). Faecal spectroscopy (NIRS) for nutritional profiling of grazing cattle. In People and Rangelands: Building the Future, Proceedings of the VI International Rangeland Congress (Eds Eldridge, D. & Freudenberg, D.), pp. 466–467. 19–23 July 1999, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. W. (2006). Challenges to assessing forage intake by grazing ruminants. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, pp. 14–26. 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. W. & Moore, J. E. (2003). Feed quality and animal performance. Field Crops Research 84, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. & Freer, M. (1995). Ingestion et digestion chez les ruminants au pâturage. In Nutrition des Ruminants Domestiques (Eds Jarrige, R., Ruckebush, Y., Demarquilly, C., Farce, M. H. & Journet, M.), pp. 871–900. Versailles: Editions Quæ, c/o INRA.Google Scholar
Cordova, F. J., Wallace, J. D. & Pieper, R. D. (1978). Forage intake by grazing livestock: a review. Journal of Range Management 31, 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi, M., Martha, G. B., Do Nascimento, D. & Balsalobre, M. A. A. (2001). Impact of grazing management on productivity of tropical grasslands. In 19th International Grassland Congress. 10–21 February 2001, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Eds Gomide, J. A., Soares, W. R. S. & da Silva, S. C.), pp. 801–806. Fundacao Estudos Agrarios Luiz Queiros (FEALQ), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N., Smith, W. F. & Louda, F. (1979). A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanchone, A., Archimède, H. & Boval, M. (2009). Comparison of fecal crude protein and fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict digestibility of fresh grass consumed by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 87, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanchone, A., Boval, M., Lecomte, P. & Archimède, H. (2007). Faecal indices based on near infrared spectroscopy to assess intake, in vivo digestibility and chemical composition of the herbage ingested by sheep (crude protein, fibres and lignin content). Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 15, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierro, L. C. & Bryant, F. C. (1990). Nutrition of herded sheep in the Andes of Southern Peru. Small Ruminant Research 3, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, F. P., Matthews, P. N. P. & Matthew, C. (2001). The effects of post-grazing sward conditions on herbage accumulation in winter and spring. In Proceedings of 19th International Grassland Congress. 10–21 February 2001, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Eds Gomide, J. A., Soares, W. R. S. & da Silva, S. C.), pp. 824–825. Fundacao Estudos Agrarios Luiz Queiros (FEALQ), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Kemp, D. R. & Michalk, D. L. (2007). Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitessa, S., Flinn, P. C. & Irish, G. G. (1999). Comparison of methods used to predict the in vivo digestibility of feeds in ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krachounov, I., Paul, C. & Kirilov, A. (2000). Application of near infrared spectroscopy (nirs) in the analysis of feces from sheep for estimation of forage digestibility and energy feeding value. Zhivotnov' Dni Nauki 37, 22–30.Google Scholar
Landau, S., Glasser, T. & Dvash, L. (2006). Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology: a review. Small Ruminant Research 61, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, S., Glasser, T., Muklada, H., Dvash, L., Perevolotsky, A., Ungar, E. D. & Walker, J. W. (2005). Fecal NIRS prediction of dietary protein percentage and in vitro dry matter digestibility in diets ingested by goats in Mediterranean scrubland. Small Ruminant Research 59, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. J., Atkins, K. D. & Swan, A. A. (2002). Pasture intake and digestibility by young and non-breeding adult sheep: the extent of genetic variation and relationships with productivity. Livestock Production Science 73, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippke, H. (2002). Estimation of forage intake by ruminants on pasture. Crop Science 42, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahieu, M., Archimède, H., Fleury, J., Mandonnet, N. & Alexandre, G. (2008). Intensive grazing system for small ruminants in the Tropics: the French West Indies experience and perspectives. Small Ruminant Research 77, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mero, R. N. & Uden, P. (1998). Promising tropical grasses and legumes as feed resources in Central Tanzania III: effect of feeding level on digestibility and voluntary intake of four grasses by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1990). Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P., Fedele, V., Decandia, M. & Frileux, Y. L. (2007). Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 68, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prache, S. & Peyraud, J. L. (1997). Sward prehensibility in cattle and sheep. INRA Productions Animales 10, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. G., Batello, C., Baas, S. & Mack, S. (2005). Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. In Grassland: A Global Resource, Proceedings of the 20th International Grassland Congress. 26 June–1 July 2005, Dublin, Ireland (Ed. McGilloway, D. A.), pp. 323–338. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. (2000). The SAS System for Windows. Release 8.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Savadogo, M., Zemmelink, G. & Nianogo, A. J. (2000). Effect of selective consumption on voluntary intake and digestibility of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) stover, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) haulms by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 84, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, K. D. & Walsh, M. G. (2007). Infrared spectroscopy – enabling an evidence-based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 15, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuth, J., Jama, A. & Tolleson, D. (2003). Direct and indirect means of predicting forage quality through near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Field Crops Research 84, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, E. D. (1996). Ingestive behaviour. In The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems (Eds Hodgson, J. & Illius, A. Q.), pp. 185–218. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1996). Allometry and ecology of feeding behavior and digestive capacity in herbivores: a review. Zoo Biology 15, 455–479.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, G. A., Tyrrell, H. F., Huntington, G. B., Waldo, D. R. & Glenn, B. P. (1990). Utilization of nitrogen and energy by Holstein steers fed formaldehyde- and formic acid-treated alfalfa or orchardgrass silage at two intakes. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3780–3791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waghorn, G. C. & Clark, D. A. (2004). Feeding value of pastures for ruminants. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52, 320–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zemmelink, G. & ′t. Mannetje, L. (2002). Value for animal production (VAP): a new criterion for tropical forage evaluation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 96, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zervas, G., Hadjigeorgiou, I., Zabeli, G., Koutsotolis, K. & Tziala, C. (1999). Comparison of a grazing- with an indoor-system of lamb fattening in Greece. Livestock Production Science 61, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar