Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:14:33.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of two methods of NaOH treatment of spring barley straw with untreated straw and hay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Smith ,
J. W. Siviter  and
W. H. Broster
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Spring barley straw treated with NaOH, either chopped and ensiled or ground and pelleted, was compared with long untreated straw and hay, in mixed diets of compound and forage fed to yearling dairy heifers. Protein allowance and source were varied by the inclusion of either fishmeal, soya-bean meal or urea in the diet.

Growth rate was improved in two out of three trials by chopped ensiled straw treated with NaOH, compared with long untreated straw, and equalled that supported by hay. Dry-matter intake and digestibility were also improved, although rumen NH3-N concentrations were low. With ground pelleted straw treated with NaOH the effects were less decisive: growth rate was increased once and reduced once compared with long untreated straw, but dry-matter intake was substantially increased. Digestibility remained similar to that of long untreated straw, and was unchanged by rate of feeding. NaOH treatment resulted in small changes in molar proportions of VFA. Digestibility of hay fell when concentrates were added to the diet.

Fishmeal increased growth rate with all forms of straw and hay and was more efficient in this respect than either soya-bean meal or urea.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 343 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnason, J. (1979). Results from Norwegian experiments with treated straw as feed for ruminants. In Straw Decay and its Effect on Disposal and Utilization (ed. Grossbard, E.), pp. 199–205. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D. & Bines, J. A. (1978). Concentrate:forage ratios for high-yielding dairy cows. In Recent Developments in Animal Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 99–126. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1980). Use of straw and cellulosio wastes and methods of improving their value. In By-Products and Wastes in Animal Feeding (ed. Ørskov, E. R.), pp. 25–31. Occasional Publication, B.S.A.P., No.3.Google Scholar
Grioera-Naón, J. J., Smith, T., Siviter, J. W. & Broster, W. H. (1982). Digestion of alkali-treated straws by yearling steers. Annual Report, National Institute for Research in Dairying (in the Press).Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G. (1978). Treating straw for animal feeding: an assessment of its technical and economic feasibility. Animal Production and Health Paper 10. Rome: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Lagerström, G. & Mattsson, A. (1981). Straw treatment according to the Boliden method. Translated from Foder-Journalen 1–2.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1981). Upgrading of Crops and Byproducts by Chemical or Biological Treatments (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ololade, B. G. & Mowat, D. N. (1975). Influence of whole-plant barley reconstituted with sodium hydroxide on digestibility, rumen fluids and plasma metabolism of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 40, 351–357.Google Scholar
Owen, E. (1981). Use of alkali-treated low quality roughages to sheep and goats. In Utilization of Low Quality Roughages in Africa (ed. Kategile, J. A., Said, A. N. and Sundstol, F.), pp. 131–150. AUN-Agricultural Development Report 1, AAS: Norway.Google Scholar
Pirie, R. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1978). Alkalitreatment of straw for ruminants. 1. Utilization of complete diets containing straw by beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 143–154.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. & Roffler, R. E. (1975). Nitrogen requirement and utilization in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1219–1237.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. & Siviter, J. W. (1981). The effects of grinding, either with or without NaOH treatment, on the utilization of straw by yearling dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 159–165.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980). Acornparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rich diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687–695.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H. & Siviter, J. W. (1980). An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology (5th edn). Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
SundstØl, F. (1981). Methods of treatment of low quality roughages. In Utilization of Low Quality Roughages in Africa (ed. Kategile, J. A., Said, A. N. and Sundstol, F.), pp. 61–80. AUN-Agricultural Development Report 1, AAS: Norway.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Bishop, C. & Ferreiro, H. M. (1981). Passage of alkali-treated straw through the digestive tract of cows. Annual Report, National Institute for Research in Dairying, p. 56.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Brigstocke, T. D. A. (1977). The commercial straw process. Process Biochemistry 12, 17–21.Google Scholar