Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T23:44:28.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of three ultrasonic machines (Scanogram, Danscan and AIDD (NZ)) and visual estimates for predicting carcass composition of live cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. J. Bass ,
G. Winn  and
W. D. Paulsen
J. J. Bass
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
G. Winn
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
W. D. Paulsen
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Very experienced livestock judges and three ultrasonic machines were compared for accuracy in predicting carcass composition.

Sixty-four steers of mixed breed were visually scored for fatness and meat yield by seven judges. Subcutaneous fat depths over the eye muscle at the 13th rib were measured with three different ultrasonic devices prior to slaughter. There was little difference between the ultrasonic machines and the best visual estimates of fatness for predicting weight of commercial trimmed or total dissected fat. Visual estimates of meat yield were not as accurate as the judges' fat scores for predicting carcass composition.

Subcutaneous fat depths measured by ultrasonics were shown to be as well related to carcass composition as the best judge's fat scores.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 337 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. Bech (1975). Recent experimental development in ultrasonic measurement of cattle. Livestock Production Science 2, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. A. (1967). The relation between live animal conformation and the carcass of cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 35, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bass, J. J. (1979). Relationships between ultrasonic measurements taken on live cattle and their composition. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 39, 217–222.Google Scholar
Bratzler, L. T. & Margerum, E. P. (1953). The relationship between live hog scores and carcass measurements. Journal of Animal Science 12, 856–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. (1976). Note on the use of the Scanogram on live cattle to predict carcass composition. Carcass and Meat Quality Commission of European Communities, pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. & Jury, K. E. (1964). Implants of oestrogenic hormones in beef cattle. IV. Effects of oestradiol benzoate plus progesterone on carcass composition and a comparison of methods of carcass evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, W. A., Burgess, T. D., Usborne, W. R., Greigher, H. & Talbot, S. (1973). A comparison of two ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of fat thickness and rib eye area in cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooden, J. M., Beach, A. D. & Purchas, R. W. (1980). Measurement of subcutaneous backfat depth in live lambs with an ultrasonic probe. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. W. (1954). Relationships of measurements of live animals to weights of grouped significant wholesale cuts and dressing percent of beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 13, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Swiger, L. A., Arthoud, K. H., Warren, R. B., Hallet, D. K. & Koch, R. M. (1962). Relationships among certain live and carcass characteristics of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 21, 720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, G. (1971). The shape of beef cattle and their carcasses in relation to carcass merit. In Beef in the Seventies, An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Harrington, G., Pearson, A. M. & Magee, W. T. (1963). Subjective evaluations of cutting yields and rib-eye area in live hogs and carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 22, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N. E. (1977). Preliminary results from Danscan ultrasonic measurement of fat thickness and loin area of lamb. Proceedings of the 28th European Association for Animal Production, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A., Jones, D. W. & Owen, M. G. (1981). Prediction of body composition of live cattle using two ultrasonic machines of differing complexity: a report of four separate trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A., Owen, M. G. & Alliston, J. C. (1979). A comparison of four ultrasonic machines (Sonatest, Scanogram, Illis Observer and Danscanner) for predicting the body composition of live pigs. Animal Production 29, 175–181.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. & Owen, M. G. (1981). A note on the accuracy of an ultrasonic technique for selecting cattle of different breeds for slaughter at equal fatness. Animal Production 32, 113–115.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. R., Suess, G. C. & Kauffman, R. G. (1969). Estimation of carcass traits by visual appraisal of market livestock. Journal of Animal Science 28, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, C. A. (1978). Note on recent advances in ultrasonic scanning of animals. Proceedings, 24th European Meal Research Workers Congress, Kulmbach, W13.3–13.6.Google Scholar
New Zealand Meat Producers Board (1979). New Zealand Export Meat Grades. P.O. Box 121, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Stouffer, J. R. & Westervelt, R. G. (1977). A review of ultrasonic applications in animal science: reverberations in echocardiograms. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 5, 124–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willman, J. P. & Krider, J. L. (1943). A study of the characteristics of live market hogs as related to the quality of carcasses produced. Journal of Animal Science 2, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar