Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:58:31.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the effects of anhydrous ammonia and a solid ammonium nitrate fertilizer on herbage production from a pure perennial ryegrass sward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Reid  and
M. E. Castle
D. Reid
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a 2-year experiment anhydrous ammonia (82% N) and an ammonium nitrate fertilizer (34·5% N) were applied at three annual rates—100, 200 and 300 lb N/acre (112, 224 and 336 kg/ha)—on an S.24 perennial ryegrass sward. At each rate the two fertilizers were applied either as a single dressing in the spring or as five equal split dressings over the season. Total yields of herbage dry matter and of crude protein were determined by cutting the herbage at approximately the same stage of growth five times each year. On the basis of total yield and seasonal distribution of yield anhydrous ammonia was best applied as a single dressing in the spring, whereas ammonium nitrate was best applied as five equal split dressings over the season. However, in both years anhydrous ammonia applied as a single dressing gave smaller yields and a poorer seasonal distribution of production than did ammonium nitrate applied as five equal split dressings. The factors contributing to the lower yield level with anhydrous ammonia applications are discussed. It is concluded that anhydrous ammonia has no marked advantages over ammonium nitrate as a nitrogen fertilizer for intensively managed grassland.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burg, P. F. J. Van & Brakel, G. D. Van (1965). The fertilizer value of anhydrous ammonia on permanent grassland. Stikstof 9, 28–36.Google Scholar
Burg, P. F. J. Van, Brakel, G. D. Van & Schepers, J. H. (1967). The agricultural value of anhydrous ammonia on grassland. Experiments 1963–65. Neth. Nitrogen tech. Bull. no. 2.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Reid, D. (1968). The effects of single compared with split applications of fertilizer nitrogen on the yield and seasonal production of a pure grass sward. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J. (1967). Anhydrous ammonia. Scott. Agric. 46, 196–8.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. E. (1959). Liquid nitrogenous fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeater, R. S. L. (1966). Liquefied ammonia in agriculture. Agriculture, Lond. 73, 542–7.Google Scholar
Jeater, R. S. L. (1967). Comparisons of liquefied (anhydrous) ammonia and ammonium nitrate as nitrogenous fertilizers for grassland. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 22, 225–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. (1966). The response of herbage yields and quality to a wide range of nitrogen application rates. Proc. 10th Int. Orassld Congr. Helsinki pp. 209–11.Google Scholar
Reid, D. (1969). The effects of a wide range of nitrogen application rates on the yields from a perennial ryegrass sward with and without white clover. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar