Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T03:19:04.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of some small-scale tests for bread-making quality used in wheat breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. Blackman
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 2LQ
A. A. Gill
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Maris Lane, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 2LQ

Summary

Twenty-five winter wheat varieties and breeders' lines including hard and soft texture, good or poor bread and biscuit-making types were grown at two locations in the U.K. in 1977 to provide the test samples. Small-scale tests of bread-making quality including extensometer, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume, residue protein, urea dispersible protein and Pelshenke tests, were compared with loaf volumes and loaf scores.

Averaged over the two sites, a modified extensometer test and the SDS test gave the closest correlation with loaf volume and loaf score and were only poorly correlated with Hagberg Falling Number and percentage protein. The SDS test gave the closest correlation between sites followed by the extensometer readings; loaf volume and score had much lower values. The SDS values and extensometer readings give a better measure of the genetic differences in protein quality of varieties than loaf volume and score, being less affected by growing conditions. With its small sample size and high throughput, the SDS sedimentation volume is likely to be the most useful screening test for wheat breeding programmes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axford, D. W. E., McDermott, E. E. & Redman, D. G. (1978). Small-scale tests of bread making quality. Milling Feed and Fertiliser 161, 1820.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. (1968). Zür genetischen und pflanzenzüchterischen Betrachtung der Weizenqualität. Getreide und Mehl 8, 6166.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. & Blackman, J. A. (1978). Breeding wheat for improvements in agronomic characters and grain quality. Flour Milling and Baking Research Association Bulletin No. 3, pp. 125139.Google Scholar
International Association for Cereal Chemistry (1967). Determination of the ‘falling number’ as a measure of the degree of alpha-amylase activity in grain and flour. ICI Method No. 107.Google Scholar
Kitterman, J. S. & Barmore, M. A. (1969). A modified micro sedimentation test for screening early generation wheat selections. Cereal Chemistry 46, 273280.Google Scholar
Orth, R. A. & O'Brien, L. A. (1976). A new biochemical test of dough strength of wheat flour. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 42, 122124.Google Scholar
Payne, P. I., Corfield, K. G. & Blackman, J. A. (1979). Identification of a high-molecular-weight sub unit of glutenin protein whose presence correlates with bread making quality in wheats of related pedigree. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 55, 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranz, Y. (1965). Dispersibility of wheat proteins in aqueous urea solutions—a new parameter to evaluate bread making potentialities of wheat flours. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 16, 586593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pushman, F. M. & Bingham, J. (1975). A reappraisal of the Pelshenke test as a screening technique in the breeding of bread making wheats for the United Kingdom. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 221231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. & Smith, D. B. (1978). A semi-micro dryblock and automated analyser technique suitable for determining protein nitrogen in plant material. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 639644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, M., Sneed, E. M. & Pope, W. K. (1965). Modification in the sedimentation test for the evaluation of small samples of wheat. Agronomy Journal 57, 93.Google Scholar