Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:29:20.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classification of confectionary sunflower genotypes based on morphological characters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

N. HLADNI
Affiliation:
Oil Crops Department, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
S. TERZIĆ
Affiliation:
Oil Crops Department, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
B. MUTAVDŽIĆ
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Dositeja Obradovića square no. 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
M. ZORIĆ*
Affiliation:
Maize Department, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: miroslav.zoric@nsseme.com

Summary

Knowledge of genetic diversity of confectionary sunflower can have a large impact on its use in breeding programmes. However, levels and distribution of genetic variation within the confectionary sunflower gene pool are still not adequately explored. The aim of the present paper was to describe the diversity of 68 confectionary sunflower genotypes: open-pollinated varieties, lines and hybrids. A total of 32 morphological traits were used for characterization. The Shannon & Weaver diversity index (H) was estimated as a measure of morphological diversity. The mean value of the Shannon index was 0·71, which indicates a high morphological diversity. The lowest diversity was found for leaf descriptors, moderately high to high for seed traits, while the highest values were found for disc flowers and ray florets. The highest individual descriptor diversity was found for: head attitude, the angle of leaf lateral nerves and ray floret disposition. The homogeneity analysis (HOMALS) multivariate reduction technique for nominal categorical data proved to be an efficient method for a comprehensive overview of genotype diversity and group homogeneity. Besides diversity, the number of categories and uniformity of genotype distribution determines discriminative power of descriptors. Traits that contributed the most to the distinction of genotypes were identified, enabling differentiation of genotypes with similar phenotypic attributes. The highest discriminative power was observed in traits such as anthocyanin colouration of stigma (DFIA), seed colour of stripes and seed main colour. The genotypes tested formed two distinctive major groups of varieties and hybrids with inbred lines widely dispersed along both axes. A separate grouping was obtained per the most discriminative traits based on HOMALS analysis, while the best separation was obtained using DFIA. Isolated genotypes that may not be representative by yield or seed-specific traits can be useful sources of traits for breeding. Morphological characterization can be used to improve description and classification of confectionary sunflower germplasm when evaluating diversity.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babić, V., Pajić, Z., Prodanović, S., Babić, M. & Filipović, M. (2010). Visual assessment of sweet maize lines phenotype, according to UPOV descriptor, as indicator of heterosis. Genetika 42, 313322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheres, M. T. & Knapp, S. J. (1998). Ancestral origins and genetic diversity of cultivated sunflower: coancestry analysis of public germplasm. Crop Science 38, 14761482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronn, R., Brothers, M., Klier, K., Bretting, P. & Wendel, J. (1997). Allozyme variation in domesticated annual sunflower and its wild relatives. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95, 532545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvishzadeh, R. (2012). Phenotypic and molecular marker distance as a tool for prediction of heterosis and F1 performance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6, 732738.Google Scholar
Da Silva, N. R. & Padovani, C. R. (2006). Utilização de componentes principais em experimentação agronômica. Energia na Agricultura 21, 98113.Google Scholar
Dong, G. J., Liu, G. S. & Li, K. F. (2007). Studying genetic diversity in the core germplasm of confectionary sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in China based on AFLP and morphological analysis. Russian Journal of Genetics 43, 627635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergen, Y. & Saglam, C. (2005). Yield and yield characters of different confectionary sunflower varieties in conditions of Tekirdag. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 2, 221227.Google Scholar
Feoli, C. E. & Ingaramo, J. (2015). South America perspectives on sunflower production and processing. In Sunflower: Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization (Eds Martínez-Force, E., Dunford, N. T. & Salas, J. J.), pp. 517533. AOCS Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Martinez, J. M., Perez-Vich, B. & Velasco, L. (2009). Sunflower. In Oil Crops: Handbook of Plant Breeding (Eds Vollmann, J. & Rajcan, I.), pp. 155232. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fick, G. N. (1976). Genetics of floral color and morphology in sunflowers. Journal of Heredity 67, 227230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilova, V. A., Rozhkova, V. T. & Anisimova, I. N. (2014). Sunflower genetic collection at the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry. Helia 37, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gontcharov, S. V. & Beresneva, N. D. (2011). Confectionery hybrid sunflower breeding in Russia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B 1, 919924.Google Scholar
Hladni, N. (2010). Genes and Sunflower Yield. Belgrade, Serbia: Zaduzbina Andrejević.Google Scholar
Hladni, N. (2016). Present status and future prospects of global confectionery sunflower production. In Proceedings of the 19th International Sunflower Conference (Eds Kaya, Y. & Hasancebi, S.), pp. 4559. Edirne, Turkey: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar
Hladni, N. & Miklič, V. (2012). Old and new trends of using genetic resources in sunflower plant breeding with the aim of preserving biodiversity. In Proceedings of the 4th Joint UNS-PSU International Conference on BioSci: Biotechnology and Biodiversity – Step in the Future (Ed. Terzić, S.), pp. 109120. Novi Sad, Serbia: Institut za Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo & Semenarska Asocijacija Srbije.Google Scholar
Hladni, N., Jocić, S., Miklič, V., Saftić-Panković, D. & Kraljević-Balalić, M. (2011). Interdependence of yield and yield components of confectionary sunflower hybrids. Genetika 43, 583594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hladni, N., Miklič, V., Jocić, S., Kraljević-Balalić, M. & Škorić, D. (2014). Mode of inheritance and combining ability for plant height and head diameter in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Genetika 46, 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hladni, N., Jocić, S., Mijić, A., Miklič, V. & Miladinović, D. (2015). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for protein yield in confectionary sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Genetika 47, 811818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafari, S., Khazaei, J., Arabhosseini, A., Massah, J. & Khostaghaza, M. H. (2011). Study on mechanical properties of sunflower seeds. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 14, 6.Google Scholar
Kaya, Y. (2004). Confectionery sunflower production in Turkey. In Proceedings of 16th International Sunflower Conference (Ed. Seiler, G.), pp. 817822. Fargo, North Dakota: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar
Kaya, Y. (2015). Sunflower. In Breeding Oilseed Crops for Sustainable Production (Ed. Gupta, S. K.), pp. 5582. London, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kaya, Y., Evci, G., Pekcan, V., Gucer, T. & Yilmaz, I. M. (2008). Yield relationships in confectionery sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In Proceedings of the Annual Conference Agricultural machinery and technologies, Agricultural sciences and veterinary medicine, Repair and reliability, (Ed. Smrikarov, A.), pp. 711. Bulgaria: University of Rousse.Google Scholar
Khazaei, J., Jafari, S. & Noorolah, S. (2008). Lognormal vs. normal and Weibull distributions for modeling the mass and size distributions of sunflower seeds and kernels. In World Conference on Agricultural Information and IT (Eds Nagatsuka, T. & Ninomiya, S.), pp. 716. Atsugi, Japan: Tokyo University of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Kholghi, M., Bernousi, I., Darvishzadeh, R. & Pirzad, A. (2011). Correlation and path-coefficient analysis of seed yield and yield related trait in Iranian confectionery sunflower populations. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 1305813063.Google Scholar
Lofgren, J. R. (1997). Sunflower for confectionary food, bird food, and pet food. In Sunflower Technology and Production (Ed. Schneiter, A. A.), pp. 747764. Agronomy Monograph no. 35. Madison, Winsconsin: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Luczkiewicz, T. & Kaczmarek, Z. (2004). The influence of morphological differences between sunflower inbred lines on their SCA effects for yield components. Journal of Applied Genetics 45, 175182.Google ScholarPubMed
Mandel, J. R., Dechaine, J. M., Marek, L. F. & Burke, J. M. (2011). Genetic diversity and population structure in cultivated sunflower and a comparison to its wild progenitor, Helianthus annuus L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123, 693704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michailidis, G. & De Leeuw, J. (1998). The Gifi system of descriptive multivariate analysis. Statistical Science 13, 307336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. & Fick, G. N. (1997). Genetics of sunflower. In Sunflower Technology and Production (Ed. Schneiter, A. A.), pp. 441495. Agronomy Monograph no. 35. Madison, Winsconsin: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Moles, A. T. & Westoby, M. (2000). Do small leaves expand faster than large leaves, and do shorter expansion times reduce herbivore damage? OIKOS 90, 517524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, M. V., Nishinakamasu, V., Loray, M. A., Alvarez, D., Gieco, J., Vicario, A., Hopp, H. E., Heinz, R. A., Paniego, N. & Lia, V. V. (2013). Genetic characterization of sunflower breeding resources from Argetina: assessing diversity in key open-pollinated and composite populations. Plant Genetic Resources 11, 238249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosjidis, J. A. (1982). Inheritance of color in the pericarp and corolla of the disc florets in sunflower. The Journal of Heredity 73, 461464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Sunflower Association (2011). Sunflower Statistics: World Supply and Disappearance. Mandan, ND: National Sunflower Association. Available from: http://www.sunflowernsa.com/stats/world-supply/ (accessed 7 September 2017).Google Scholar
Perić, V. (2015). Analysis of genetic diversity of soybean genotypes based on morphological and molecular markers . Ph.D. Thesis, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade, Serbia.Google Scholar
Perić, V., Nikolić, A., Babić, V., Sudarić, A., Srebrić, M., Đorđević, V. & Mladenović-Drinić, S. (2014). Genetic relatedness of soybean genotypes based on agromorphological traits and RAPD markers. Genetika 46, 839854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M., Reddy, G. L., Kulkarni, R. S., Lalitha Reddy, S. S. & Ramesh, S. (2004). Stability analysis of sunflower hybrids through non-parametric model. Helia 27, 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santalla, E. M. & Mascheroni, R. H. (2003). Physical properties of high oleic sunflower seeds. Food Science and Technology International 9, 435442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiter, A. A. & Miller, J. F. (1981). Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Science 21, 901903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, G. J. (2012). Utilization of wild Helianthus species in sunflower breeding. In Sunflower Genetics and Breeding (Eds Škorić, D., Seiler, G. J., Zhao, L., Jan, C. C., Miller, J. F. & Charlet, L. D.), pp. 355429 and 344–430. Novi Sad, Serbia: Serbian Academy of Science and Arts.Google Scholar
Seiler, G. J., Lili L, Q., & Marek, L. F. (2017). Utilization of sunflower crop wild relatives for cultivated sunflower improvement. Crop Science 57, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, B. B. & Ogorzaly, M. C. (1986). Economic Botany, Plants in Our World. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Sincik, M. & Goksoy, A. T. (2014). Investigation of correlation between traits and path analysis of confectionary sunflower genotypes. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 42, 227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Škorić, D. (2012). Sunflower breeding. In Sunflower Genetics and Breeding (Eds Škorić, D., Seiler, G. J., Zhao, L., Jan, C. C., Miller, J. F. & Charlet, L. D.), pp. 165354. Novi Sad, Serbia: Serbian Academy of Science and Arts.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. (2014). The domestication of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 23, 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. E., Al-Dos, A. & Warburton, M. (1991). Morphological and agronomic variation in North African and Arabian alfalfa . Crop Science 31, 11591163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleri, D. & Cleveland, D. (1993). Hopi crop diversity and change. Journal of Ethnobiology 13, 203231.Google Scholar
Szabó, B., Szabó, M., Varga, C. S., Tóth, F. & Vagvölgyi, S. (2010). Relationships between sunflower variety, sowing date and the extent of damage caused by the European sunflower moth (Homoeosoma nebulellum Den. et Schiff.). Helia 33, 3745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, A. S. & Tan, A. (2010). Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) landraces of Turkey: their collection, conservation and morphometric characterization. Helia 33, 5562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, A. S., Aldemir, M. & Altunok, A. (2016 a). Oilseed and confectionary sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) researches in Aegean Agricultural Research Institute (AARI). In Proceedings of the 19th International Sunflower Conference (Eds Kaya, Y. & Hasancebi, S.), pp. 527534. Edirne, Turkey: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar
Tan, A. S., Altunok, A. & Aldemir, M. (2016 b). Oilseed and confectionary sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) landraces of Turkey. In Proceedings of the 19th International Sunflower Conference (Eds Kaya, Y. & Hasancebi, S.), pp. 556566. Edirne, Turkey: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar
Terzić, S., Zorić, M., Dedić, B., Atlagić, J., Jocić, S., Miladinović, D. & Ovuka, J. (2016). Morphological characterization of UGA-SAM1 sunflower association mapping population (abstract). In Proceedings of the 19th International Sunflower Conference (Eds Kaya, Y. & Hasancebi, S.), pp. 479. Edirne, Turkey: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar
Tessier, C., David, J., This, P., Boursiquot, J. M. & Charrier, A. (1999). Optimization of the choice of molecular markers for varietal identification in Vitis vinifera L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98, 171177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UPOV (2000). Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability: Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). TG/81/6. Geneva, Switzerland: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Available from: http://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/en/tg081.pdf (accessed 7 September 2017).Google Scholar
USDA Economic Research Service (2017). Sunflowerseed. Washington, DC: USDA-ERS. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/soybeans-oil-crops/sunflowerseed/ (accessed 7 September 2017).Google Scholar
Weisheng, D., Lanxiang, L. & Zhiying, L. (1991). A study on the physiological life span of sunflower leaf. Helia 14, 113116.Google Scholar
Yang, D., Niklas, K. J., Xiang, S. & Sun, S. (2010). Size-dependent leaf area ratio in plant twigs: implication for leaf size optimization. Annals of Botany 105, 7177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H. (2004). Sunflower needed by the Chinese market. In Proceedings of 16th International Sunflower Conference (Ed. Seiler, G.), pp. 823826. Fargo, North Dakota: International Sunflower Association.Google Scholar