Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T05:53:48.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of climatic factors affecting chilling injury in field-grown ratoon cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. H. Sachs  and
S. Zilkah
M. H. Sachs
Affiliation:
Institute of Field and Gorden Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50–250, Israel
S. Zilkah
Affiliation:
Institute of Field and Gorden Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50–250, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Text abstract

The response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to chilling temperatures has been documented mainly for germinating seeds and young seedlings (Christiansen, 1963; Christiansen & St John, 1981; Guinn, 1971; Sellschop & Salmon, 1928). Ratoon (known also as stub or biennial) cotton offers an opportunity to study the chilling injury of mature plants under field conditions. Observations showed that ratooning plants suffer stand loss during the winter. However, the surviving plants recover and start growing vigorously when temperatures rise, early in the following spring (Ellern, 1966; Evenson, 1970; McClintic, 1981).

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 475 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Christiansen, M. N. (1963). Influence of chilling upon seedling development of cotton. Plant Physiology 38, 520–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. N. (1968). Induction and prevention of chilling injury to radicle tips of imbibing cottonseed. Plant Physiology 43, 743–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. N. & Ashworth, E. N. (1978). Prevention of chilling injury to seedling cotton with anti-transpirants. Crop Science 18, 907–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. N. & St John, J. B. (1981). The nature of chilling injury and its resistance in plants. In Analysis and Improvement of Plant Cold Hardiness (ed. Olien, C. R. and Smith, M. N.), pp. 1–16. Boca Raton, LA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ellern, S. J. (1966). Ratoon (biennial) cotton in Israel. Cotton Growing Review 43, 33–36.Google Scholar
Evenson, J. P. (1970). Ratooning of cotton. Cotton Growing Review 47, 1–7.Google Scholar
Guinn, G. (1971). Chilling injury in cotton seedlings: changes in permeability of cotyledons. Crop Science 11, 101–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. M. (1973). Chilling injury in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintic, D. (1981). Stub cotton: boon or bane? The Furrow, 05–06, p. 6.Google Scholar
Sachs, M. H. & Karni, S. (1976). Capture of pink bollworm in sex pheromone traps and its correlation with subsequent infestation of cotton. Hassadeh 56, 1505–1510 (Hebrew, with English summary).Google Scholar
Sellschop, J. P. F. & Salmon, S. C. (1928). The influence of chilling above the freezing point on certain crop plants. Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 315–338.Google Scholar
Vasil'yev, I. M. (1961). Cold death of heat-loving plants (‘Chilling injury in plants’). In Wintering of Plants (ed. Levitt, J.), pp. 25–30. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar