Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T04:55:59.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breed differences in water metabolism and body composition of sheep and goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. A. Aganga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
N. N. Umunna
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
E. O. Oyedipe
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, National Animal Production and Research Institute, Shika, Zaria, Nigeria
P. N. Okoh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

Summary

Water metabolism of two breeds of sheep (Uda and Yankasa)and two breeds of goat (Sahel and Maradi) was studied. Tritiated water space as a percentage of live weight was 80·5 and 73·6 % for Uda and Yankasa, respectively, and 77·8 and 66·1 % for Sahel and Maradi, respectively. The biological half-life of tritium was least in Yankasa (115 h) and longest in Sahel (173 h). Water turnover (I/day per animal) was 2·52, 2·63, 0·86 and 1·09 for Uda, Yankasa, Sahel and Maradi, respectively.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggrey, E. K. (1982). Seasonal changes in water content and turnover in cattle, sheep and goats grazing under humid tropical conditions in Ghana. In Use of Tritiated Water in Studies of Production and Adaptation in Ruminants, pp. 133142. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1984). Prediction of components of steer carcass using tritiated body water space, fat depth and fasted liveweight or carcass weight. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 435442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V. & Howard, B. (1966). Water content and turnover of identical twin Bos indicus and B. taurus in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 6, 297302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Howard, B. & Morris, R. J. H. (1966). Water metabolism of Merino sheep shorn during summer. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 219225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. (1963). Body composition in vivo. III. The composition of living ruminants and its relation to the tritiated water spaces. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 945952.Google Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. & Till, A. R. (1963). Body composition in vivo. II. The composition of mature goats and its relationship to the antipyrine tritiated water, and N-acetyl-4-amino-antipyrine space. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 926943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranjhan, S. K., Kalanidhi, A. P., Gosh, T. K., Singh, U. B. & Saxena, K. K. (1982). Body composition and water metabolism in tropical ruminants using tritiated water. In Use of Tritiated Water in Studies of Production and Adaptation in Ruminants, pp. 117132. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1959). Statistical Methods(6th edn). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Springell, P. H. (1968). Water content and water turnover in beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 129144.Google Scholar
Springell, P. H. & Wright, D. E. (1976). Liquid scintillation counting of tritiated water in plasma following dioxane precipitation. International Journal of Applied Radioactivity Isotopes 27, 8588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar