Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:46:43.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and sex differences in skeletal dimensions of sheep in the first year of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. W. Searle ,
N. McC. Graham ,
J. B. Donnelly  and
D. E. Margan
T. W. Searle
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
N. McC. Graham
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
J. B. Donnelly
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 218, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
D. E. Margan
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Various measures of skeletal size were made on five or six occasions on 30 Dorset Horn and 30 Corriedale sheep (10 entire males, 10 females and 10 castrated males) commencing at 1 month of age (live weight 10 kg) and then at increments of 10 kg until 55 kg. After weaning at 6–7 weeks, they were fed ad libitumon a high-quality diet. The data sets for each sheep were analysed separately and, where appropriate, pooled equations for sex and breed were generated. Within both breeds, males had the widest shoulders at any given age and, within the Corriedales, males had the deepest chests. Dorset Horns grew faster than Corriedales and, except for leg length, were larger and heavier at corresponding ages.

At any given live weight, there was no difference between sexes within breeds and the breeds had similar chest depths. The Corriedales had longer legs and smaller shoulders than the Dorset Horns at all weights and, when heavier than 30 kg, were also larger in other body dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 349 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Brännäng, E. (1971). Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characters. Part II. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 69–78.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brody, S., Davis, H. P. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1937). Growth and development with special reference to domestic animals. XLI. Relation between liveweight and chest girth in dairy cattle of unknown age. University of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 262.Google Scholar
Davis, H. P., Morgan, R. F., Brody, S. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1937). Relation of height at withers and chest girth to liveweight of dairy cattle of different breeds and ages. University of Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 91.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G. & Black, J. R. (1984). A system for predicting body composition and performance of growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58, 725–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. J. (1981). LMM-a subroutine for unconstrained non-linear least-squares fitting. CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, Consulting Report No. VT8I/23, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Ocariz, J. L. H., Littlejohn, A. & Robertson, I. S. (1970). A comparison of entire and ovariectomized beef heifers treated with ethylestrenol. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Paver, H. & Wilson, J. C. (1970). Effect of castration and dietary protein level on growth and carcass composition in beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J. O. & Cartwright, T. C. (1979). A general cattle production systems model. I. Structure of the model. Agricultural Systems 4, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W. & Griffiths, D. A. (1976). Differences in body composition between three breeds of sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11, 57–60.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC. & Donnelly, J. B. (1989). Change of skeletal dimensions during growth in sheep: the effect of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC. & O'Callaghan, M. (1972). Growth in sheep. I. The chemical composition of the body. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC., Griffiths, D. A. & Margan, D. E. (1988). Longitudinal studies of body composition during growth in male, female and castrate male sheep of two breeds with different wool growing capabilities. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, R. V. (1980). The hormonal control of growth at puberty. In Growth in Animals (Ed. Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 25–45. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, J. N. B., Heaney, D. P., Fiser, P. S. & Langford, G. A. (1984). Influence of breed, birth date, age and body weight on linear body measurements of growing rams maintained in a controlled environment. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. M. (1983). Simulation models for evaluating the management of ruminants in developing countries. In Feed Information and Animal Production (Eds Robards, G. E. & Packham, R. G.), pp. 463–473. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1967). A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Animal Production 9, 177–195.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. & Hayter, S. (1974). Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Animal Production 19, 47–65.Google Scholar
Wynn, P. C. & Thwaites, C. J. (1981). The relative growth and development of the carcass tissues of Merino and crossbred rams and wethers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 947–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar