Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T19:31:11.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aqueous ammonia compared with other nitrogenous fertilizers as solids and solutions on grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. R. Hodgson  and
A. P. Draycott
D. R. Hodgson
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Sciences, Leeds University
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Sciences, Leeds University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments with Italian ryegrass cut four times a year compared aqueous ammonia with ammonium sulphate and with a mixture of ammonium nitrate and urea (equal parts by weight). In 1963 four rates of nitrogen, 224, 448, 672 and 896 lb/acre, were applied as single and split dressings of injected aqueous ammonia, as solid ammonium sulphate and as injected solution of ammonium sulphate. There was little difference in total dry-matter yield between a single injection of aqueous ammonia and the split dressing of solid. Injecting ammonium sulphate solution eliminated scorch caused by single applications of solid supplying 448 lb N/acre or more and gave significantly greater dry-matter yields. A single application of 448 lb N/acre provided enough nitrogen to sustain the response of the grass to the end of the season.

In 1964 a single injection of aqueous ammonia was compared with ammonium nitrate/urea applied as solid or solution at 280, 560 and 840 lb N/acre. There was no difference in total dry-matter yield between aqueous ammonia and ammonium nitrate/urea at rates of 560 and 840 lb/acre. At 280 lb/acre a split dressing of solid produced most dry matter. More than 280 lb N/acre was required, therefore, as a single application in spring to last the whole season, but this rate of nitrogen applied as a split dressing was almost sufficient to give maximum yield.

In both experiments the seasonal distribution of dry matter was similar for single and split applications except in 1963 when large single injections of ammonium sulphate produced greater yields at the third cut than the split applications. The percentage of nitrogen recovered in the harvested grass decreased as nitrogen rate was increased and was greater from single than split applications. Recovery of nitrogen from aqueous ammonia was less efficient from four injections than one, and was greater in 1964 than 1963 due to better penetration of the sward by injector tines. Least nitrogen was recovered from surface-applied solutions of ammonium nitrate/urea. Regressions of dry-matter yield on nitrogen yield showed that single injections of aqueous ammonia were as efficient as other fertilizers tested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 1968 , pp. 195 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cowling, D. W. (1966). The response of grass swards to nitrogenous fertilizer. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congr. pp. 234–9.Google Scholar
Davies, W. & Williams, T. E. (1958). Fertilizers and grassland Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 51.Google Scholar
Fertiliser Statistics (1964). London: Fertilizer Manufacturers' Association Ltd.Google Scholar
Garwood, E. A. & Williams, T. E. (1967a). Soil water use and growth of a grass sward. J. agrie. Sci., Camb. 68, 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garwood, E. A. & Williams, T. E. (1967b). Growth, water use and nutrient uptake from the sub-soil of grass swards. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 69, 125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, H. R. (1959). Liquid nitrogenous fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeater, R. S. L. (1966). Liquefied ammonia in agriculture. Agriculture, Lond. 73, 542–7.Google Scholar
Kaltofen, H., Kreil, W., Kasdork, K. & Leistner, J. (1966). The effect of heavy doses of nitrogen applied to pasture in spring compared with split applications given during the vegetation period. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congr. 231–4.Google Scholar
van Burg, P. F. J., van Brakel, G. D. & Schepter, J. H. (1967). The agricultural value of anhydrous ammonia on grassland. Experiments 1963–1965. Neth. Nitrogen Tech. Bull. no. 2.Google Scholar