Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:09:02.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of the relationships between climate variability and grapevine phenology in the Nobile di Montepulciano wine production area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2010

A. DALLA MARTA
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine18-50144, Firenze, Italy
D. GRIFONI*
Affiliation:
CNR – Institute of Biometeorology, Via Caproni, 8-50145 Firenze, Italy
M. MANCINI
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine18-50144, Firenze, Italy
P. STORCHI
Affiliation:
CRA – Unit for Viticultural Research, Via Romea, 53-52100 Arezzo, Italy
G. ZIPOLI
Affiliation:
CNR – Institute of Biometeorology, Via Caproni, 8-50145 Firenze, Italy
S. ORLANDINI
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine18-50144, Firenze, Italy
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: d.grifoni@ibimet.cnr.it

Summary

Climate represents one of the main inputs necessary for plants to complete their vegetative–productive cycle, having a direct effect on the onset and duration of phenological stages and development of crops. Equally important are its indirect effects, affecting field operations such as the application of fertilizer, pruning and crop protection, finally determining the yield.

In the present study, phenological stages of the Sangiovese grapevine for the production of Nobile di Montepulciano wine were analysed and related to historical series of meteorological information (since 1970 in Tuscany, Italy). Weather conditions were described through large-scale meteorological information; in particular geopotential height at the 500 hPa level (500 hPa GPH) and North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index were considered. All data were provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (NOAA-CIRES) Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA, available from the NOAA-CIRES website (http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/) and processed by the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis Project. Conventional meteorological data, such as air temperature and cumulated rainfall, from ground weather stations were also used.

The effects of meteorological parameters on crop phenology (bud-break, flowering and harvest time) were investigated by means of regression analysis, while teleconnections between phenological data and large-scale meteo-climatological data were analysed through correlation maps created using the interactive plotting and analysis link from the NOAA-CIRES website (http://www.cdc.noaa.gov). All correlations were calculated on a monthly to a multi-monthly basis, and also in relation to the different physiological stages of the crop, from 1970 to 2006.

The climate change and variability impact on the crop was investigated by trend analysis of meteorological information and its effect on the onset of grapevine phenological stages.

The results demonstrated that large-scale meteorological information has a significant effect on the onset of the phenological stages of grapevine. In particular, winter NAO was negatively correlated with bud-break and flowering dates, while GPH of February–March, March–May and May–September were negatively correlated with bud-break, flowering and harvest dates, respectively. The trend analysis demonstrated that the change and variability of climate, due to global warming, directly affects the development of grapevine leading to an anticipation of all considered phenophases.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, M. D., Kettlewell, P. S., Hollins, P. D., Stephenson, D. B. & Hardwick, N. V. (2005). Summer climate mediates UK wheat quality response to winter North Atlantic Oscillation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 130, 2737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, E., Pasqualoni, L., Federico, S., Fornaciari, M., Bonofiglio, T., Orlandi, F., Bellocci, C. & Romano, B. (2008). Correlation between large-scale atmospheric fields and the olive pollen season in Central Italy. International Journal of Biometeorology 52, 787796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balloid, M. & Baggiolini, M. (1993). Les stades repères de la vigne. Revue Suisse de Viticulture Arboriculture Horticulture 25, 79.Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., Morabito, M., Crisci, A., Grifoni, D., Torrigiani, T., Petralli, M., Maracchi, G. & Orlandini, S. (2008). Recent trends in Tuscany (Italy) summer temperature and indices of extremes. International Journal of Climatology 28, 17511760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benestad, R. E. (2001). The cause of warming over Norway in the ECHAM4/OPYC3 GHG integration. International Journal of Climatology 21, 371387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindi, M., Miglietta, F., Gozzini, B., Orlandini, S. & Seghi, L. (1997 a). A simple model for simulation of growth and development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). I Model description. Vitis 36, 6771.Google Scholar
Bindi, M., Miglietta, F., Gozzini, B., Orlandini, S. & Seghi, L. (1997 b). A simple model for simulation of growth and development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). II Model validation. Vitis 36, 7376.Google Scholar
Craddock, J. M. (1979). Methods of comparing annual rainfall records for climatic purposes. Weather 34, 332346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, P., Yoo, J. C. & Jaeger, S. (2002). Changing seasons: an effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation? Journal of Climate 15, 435445.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, M. A. & Manso Orgaz, M. D. (2001). The influence of climatic variability on the quality of wine. International Journal of Biometeorology 45, 1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitter, A. H., Fitter, R. S. R., Harris, I. T. B. & Williamson, M. H. (1995). Relationship between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England. Functional Ecology 9, 5560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, R. O. (1987). Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Gormsen, A. K., Hense, A., Toldam-Andersen, T. B. & Braun, P. (2005). Large-scale climate variability and its effects on mean temperature and flowering time of Prunus and Betula in Denmark. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 82, 4150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grifoni, D., Mancini, M., Orlandini, S., Rossi, M. & Zipoli, G. (2003). Analysis of grapevine production using some meteorological indices. In Proceedings of Sixth European Conference on Applications of Meteorology (CD-ROM). Roma, Italy. Berlin: European Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Grifoni, D., Mancini, M., Maracchi, G., Orlandini, S. & Zipoli, G. (2006). Analysis of Italian wine quality using freely available meteorological information. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 57, 339346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huglin, P. (1986). Biologie et Écologie de la Vigne. Paris, France: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Hurley, G., Gilliland, T. J. & O'Donovan, M. (2008). Relationship between reproductive initiation and ear emergence development in Lolium perenne L.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 655665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, J. W. (1995). Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation and relationships to regional temperature and precipitation. Science 269, 676679.Google Scholar
Hurrell, J. W. (1996). Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on Northern Hemisphere temperature. Geophysical Research Letters 23, 665668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, J. W. & Van Loon, H. (1997). Decadal variations in climate associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Climatic Change 36, 301326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. D., Jonsson, T. & Wheeler, D. (1997). Extension to the North Atlantic Oscillation using early instrumental pressure observations from Gibraltar and south-west Iceland. International Journal of Climatology 17, 14331450.Google Scholar
Jones, G. V. & Davis, R. E. (2000 a). Climate influence on grapevine phenology, grape composition, and wine production and quality for Bordeaux, France. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 51, 249261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. V. & Davis, R. E. (2000 b). Using a synoptic climatological approach to understand climate-viticulture relationships. International Journal of Climatology 20, 813837.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistlter, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetma, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R. & Joseph, E. D. (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 77, 437471.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaveness, D. & Wielgolaski, F. E. (1996). Plant phenology in Norway – a summary of past and present first flowering dates (FFDs) with emphasis on conditions within three different areas. Phenology and Seasonality 1, 4761.Google Scholar
Klik, A. & Eitzinger, J. (2010). Impact of climate change on soil erosion and the efficiency of soil conservation practices in Austria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, In press, doi:10.1017/S0021859610000158.Google Scholar
Lamb, P. J. & Peppler, R. A. (1991). West Africa. In Teleconnections Linking the Worldwide Anomalies (Eds Glantz, M. H., Katz, R. W. & Nicholls, N.), pp. 121189. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moncur, M. W., Rattigan, K., Mackenzie, D. H. & McIntyre, G. N. (1989). Base temperature for budbreak and leaf appearance of grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 40, 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, M. G., Bouquet, A. & Williams, L. E. (1992). Biology of the Grapevine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nemani, R. R., White, M. A., Cayan, D. R., Jones, G. V., Running, S. W., Coughlan, J. C. & Peterson, D. L. (2001). Asymmetric warming over coastal California and its impact on the premium wine industry. Climate Research 19, 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordli, Ø., Wielgolaski, F. E., Bakken, A. K., Hjeltnes, S. H., Måge, F., Sivle, A. & Skre, O. (2008). Regional trends for bud burst and flowering of woody plants in Norway as related to climate change. International Journal of Biometeorology 52, 625639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborne, T. J., Briffa, K. R., Tett, S. F. B., Jones, P. D. & Trigo, R. M. (1999) Evaluation of the North Atlantic Oscillation as simulated by a coupled climate model. Climate Dynamics 15, 685702.Google Scholar
Post, E. & Stenseth, N. C. (1999). Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology 80, 13221339.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, H., Cunha, M. & Abreu, I. (2009). A bioclimatic model for forecasting olive yield. Journal of Agricultural Science 147, 647656.Google Scholar
Salmi, T., Määttä, A., Anttila, P., Ruoho-Airola, T. & Amnell, T. (2002). Detecting Trends of Annual Values of Atmospheric Pollutants by the Mann-Kendall Test and Sen's Slope Estimates – the Excel Template Application MAKESENS. Publications on Air Quality 31. Helsinki: Finnish Meteorological Institute.Google Scholar
Sivle, A. (2005). Climatic Oscillations in the Period 1910–2004 (in Norwegian). Bergen, Norway: Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Vilanova, M., Santalla, M. & Masa, A. (2009). Environmental and genetic variation of phenolic compounds in grapes (Vitis vinifera) from northwest Spain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 683697.Google Scholar
Wanner, H., Bronnimann, S., Casty, C., Gyalistras, D., Luterbacher, J., Schmutz, C., Stephenson, D. B. & Xoplaki, E. (2001). North Atlantic Oscillation – concepts and studies. Surveys in Geophysics 22, 321381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A. & Wilhelm, W. W. (2006). The circuitous path to the comparison of simulated values from crop models with field observations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 475488.Google Scholar