Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T20:32:21.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The analysis of the lactation curve into maximum yield and persistency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. G. Sanders
Affiliation:
(Institute of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)

Extract

An attempt has been made to analyse the lactation yield into its two components, maximum yield and persistency; the latter has been defined as the ratio of lactation to maximum yield, and has been measured by a S.F. calculated from , where R is the mean ratio for the month of calving concerned.

Whilst, when corrections for external factors are applied, maximum and persistence are equally constant throughout the cow's life, these factors cause wider individual fluctuations with persistency; maximum yield is subject to a more rigid limit and may be largely determined by the area of the mammary gland, but persistency seems to be chiefly a nutritional factor—that is to say, it depends on the success of the mammary gland in competing with the other tissues of the body for the available nutriment. This leads to the view that persistency is higher in the dairy type of cow; it also appears to be associated with high constitution, for very definite positive selection is apparent with persistency, as compared to marked negative selection for maximum—this is attributed to pathological attrition falling more heavily on cows with high initial yield and low persistency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Brody, . Growth and development. X. The relation between the course of growth and the course of senescence, with special reference to the age changes in milk secretion. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. (1927), 105.Google Scholar
(2) Eckles, . Dairy Cattle and Milk Production. New York, 1927, 2nd edition, p. 410.Google Scholar
(3) Eckles, and Palmer, . The influence of plane of nutrition of the cow upon the composition and properties of milk and butter-fat. Influence of over-feeding. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. (1916), 24.Google Scholar
(4) Fisher, . Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, 1925, p. 220.Google Scholar
(5) Gaines, . Persistency of lactation in dairy cows. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. (1927), 288.Google Scholar
(6) Gaines, and Davidson, . The effect of advance in lactation and gestation on mammary activity. J. Gen. Physiol. (1926), 9, 325.Google Scholar
(7) Gavin, . Studies in milk records. The influence of foetal growth on yield. J. Agric. Sci. (1913), 5, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Hammond, . Reproduction in the Rabbit. Edinburgh, 1925.Google Scholar
(9) Roberts, . Proceedings of the World's Dairy Congress. London, 1928, p. 281.Google Scholar
(10) Rogers, (Associates of). Fundamentals of Dairy Science. New York, 1928, pp. 484–5.Google Scholar
(11) Sanders, . The shape of the lactation curve. J. Agric. Sci. (1923), 13, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Sanders, The variations in milk yields caused by season of the year, service, age, and dry period, and their elimination. J. Agric. Sci. (1927), 17, 339–79, 502–23, and 18, 46–67, 209–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Turner, . Effect of gestation upon lactation. Guernsey Breeders Journal, August, 1924.Google Scholar
(14) Turner, A study of the relation between food consumption and milk secretion. J. Dairy Sci. (1924), 7, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Turner, A quantitative form of expressing persistency of milk and fat secretion. J. Dairy Sci. (1926), 9, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Turner, Persistency of fat secretion during the lactation period as affected by age. J. Dairy Sci. (1927), 10, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Yule, . An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. London, 1927, 2nd edition, p. 214.Google Scholar